orx626 wrote:powerup wrote:Just to clarify that post was not directed at anyone in particular.
Then why even say it then? It didn't add anything to your supercharger drive belt slip reduction advice, other than permit forum users to assume that it was directed at the designer and that they had offered bad advice. This was confirmed by Regie's and Magpie's reactions. Hence the reason I asked for clarification. Thanks for confirming that it wasn't directed at the GT Plus kit designer.
FWIW, CAR53's supercharger arrangement is not the off-the-shelf GT Plus kit. It is a one-off version of the GT Plus kit modified to the owners specifications. Automotive Plus has had relatively limited post installation involvement as the vehicle owner is managing the tuning and testing program (Automotive Plus assist when requested), unlike the GT Plus kit which had over 3 years of tuning and testing (including numerous track events). That R&D program yielded a very robust product that doesn't have the belt slip problem that you have had to resolve with your supercharger kit.
Regards,
Danny
I fully concur with Danny's view. I am going down a one-off development path using bits of his GT Plus kit. Any of the issues I share on this forum are for the interest of the members in my experimental development and it would be completely inappropriate to associated any of these issues with the GT plus kit. For the record the SC belt slip experienced during the last dyno session was due to my not checking the setup after re-installing the power steering which I had deleted and not due to any deficiencies in the GT plus kit design. In fact the problem was fixed in a few seconds with a spanner. The main slip problem during the session was with the clutch which I am upgrading.
As to the issue of the coating, this is a precaution being applied to the next stage which is a smaller SC pulley.
Also for the record I am fully aware of the dynamics of the serpentine belt drive and the significance of the position of the SC pulley in the run on slip.