Polyurethane vs. Polypropylene

Body, Paint, Interior and Trim questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

zacMX5aus
Driver
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:02 pm
Vehicle: NA6

Polyurethane vs. Polypropylene

Postby zacMX5aus » Tue Oct 17, 2017 11:31 pm

Hi all,

I am looking at buying an r package style front lip for me NA. I have found two that are reasonably priced, the only difference being one is polypropylene and one is polyurethane. I don't know much about plastics and was hoping someone could give some advice on if there is really much difference between PU and PP, is one more likely to crack/damage? is one easier to paint than the other? any other info.

Your help is greatly appreciated.

-Zac

manga_blue
Forum Guru
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Moruya, NSW

Re: Polyurethane vs. Polypropylene

Postby manga_blue » Wed Oct 18, 2017 12:48 pm

I'd just go with style and price.

I have a high density polyethylene (HDPE) fishing kayak that I've used for years in what you might call high-risk locations (i.e. places where boats don't dare go). It's been crunched onto exposed bomboras, speared nose first into a rocky bottom, piched end over end in heavy swell, slammed against cliffs, rolled over sandy bars and dragged across oyster beds. Apart from oyster scratches there's hardly a mark on it. If HDPE survives all that it will stand up fine to use as a body kit.

In terms of toughness LPDE (low density PE) is weaker than HDPE which is weaker than polypropylene. HDPE and polypropylene should work fine. LPDE is more flexible and would probably be OK too..

In terms of painting they're all about equally difficult. All need special primers.
’95 NA8

StillIC
Racing Driver
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:30 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle

Re: Polyurethane vs. Polypropylene

Postby StillIC » Thu Oct 19, 2017 6:47 pm

Polyurethane (PU) is a more expensive and more robust plastic than polyprop (PP). PU is used in traffic cones, rally car mudflaps and the like...very tough. PP is used in cheap outdoor furniture, corflute signs and the like, but is still pretty good, toughness wise, considering its price. Having said all that, my guess is the PP lip will be lighter than the PU.
WP:1.12.492 SMPN:1.16.403 SMPS:1.05.473 SMPGP:1.53.256 SMPB:2.22.181

93_Clubman
Speed Racer
Posts: 11854
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Melbourne

Re: Polyurethane vs. Polypropylene

Postby 93_Clubman » Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:03 am

zacMX5aus wrote:r package style front lip for me NA.

Location of body part, as you seemed to be indicating (in this case a front lip) is another consideration if ground clearance in minimal due to potential contact with speed humps & kerbing when parking etc.

User avatar
hks_kansei
Speed Racer
Posts: 6154
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Victoria

Re: Polyurethane vs. Polypropylene

Postby hks_kansei » Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:51 am

For a front lip I'd be wanting whichever has the most ability to bend rather than break.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)

Mr Morlock
Speed Racer
Posts: 6444
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Melbourne

Re: Polyurethane vs. Polypropylene

Postby Mr Morlock » Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:46 am

I reckon whatever you put on the front of an MX-5 i.e. a lip if it's below standard height its a pain. I have a modern car with a low lip - standard product but its low and it carries scratches. Too many high kerbs, traffic bumps , and dodgy driveways.


Return to “MX5 Body, Paint, Interior & Trim”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests