97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Chat to do with your MX5/Miata/Eunos Garage Ride(s).

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy

97 MXV
Racing Driver
Posts: 1052
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:51 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane Southside

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby 97 MXV » Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:56 pm

Lokiel wrote:
97 MXV wrote:I do worry now that she is a girl that she might become as demanding as Lokiel's Gina seems to be.
You're lucky she is so demanding, she "made me" buy the flat-top/square-top manifold from you many moons ago without haggling over the price.

Thanks for that Gina ! :D Lockiel helped me afford that extra coat of SHINE for Sparkley's wheels. IOU a couple Lockiel !. :beer: :beer:

Confirming Sparkley has definitely moved on from the fake diffuser idea and agrees with Lockiel's ideas on a bespoke NA rear bumper cut.
Sparkley sends her love and once plastic surgery is over, promises to give everyone some eye candy whilst out on the track.
Imagine her new rear end just sitting there occupying the lap of someone fast enough to approach her from behind. :twisted:

BTW I wonder if Gina has seen this last remaining beautiful bar ? I would hate to disappoint her by a mistaken refusal to haggle.

Garido
Fast Driver
Posts: 438
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:50 pm
Vehicle: NA8

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby Garido » Sun Apr 30, 2017 2:57 pm

As I've been partially dead due to having to relocate house I've missed this thread. Subbed for every chapter and when it's re-released in pocket book form ;)


Who knows I might make one too.

97 MXV
Racing Driver
Posts: 1052
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:51 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane Southside

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby 97 MXV » Sun Apr 30, 2017 5:08 pm

Garido wrote:I've been partially dead due to having to relocate house
Here's a couple for a speedy recovery Ray :beer: :beer:


"Safety Wire Free" Sump Plug for Sparkley

Sump plugs are sometimes required to be Safety Wired because it seems sump plugs can be challenging to properly keep tight.
My quest is to have a sump plug which needs no safety wire.
Some configurations of sump plugs need something because they are big diameter heavy plugs hard to torque tighten located low and close to fast moving ground and a head not projecting down outside or drain not projecting up inside leaves little room for decent thread locking.
In the past, some manufacturers even used short large steel plugs in very thin large diameter threaded steel nuts requiring extra torque to tighten sweated onto a flimsy housing (sheet metal sump pan) that can't take extra torque...horrific things that still give me nightmares !

Plugs are not joints subject to cyclic load, but more likely subject to vibratory motion of the sump and stress relating to differential expansion and contraction with high sump oil temperature.
Small plugs with long threads in cast alloy housings likely tighten much better. The smaller and lighter the plug and longer the thread the better.

Now linear thermal expansion coefficient of Aluminium Housing is much higher than a Steel Plug and far higher than a Titanium Plug.
The very low expansion and high stiffness of a steel plug (the male) is stretched hard by an alloy housing (the female) countering this is expansion of the female thread diameter exceeding the swelling around the girth of the male plug adding axial clearance in the screw itself.
However this clearance does not appear to be enough in a stiff steel plug to prevent the female maintaining pressure upon the male in a hot embrace.
A titanium plug is just not stiff enough to maintain strong intimate contact along its length to compensate for its lesser ability to swell its diameter on a hot lap.
This all means the steel plug has a significant thread locking safety advantage, thread locking harder with heat than a titanium plug by around 1.47/0.84, a factor of 175% or simply 75% more.

Image

In other words a Steel Plug is a 75% safer plug than a Titanium Plug, ie so much harder to budge when in the thick of a hot lap. Therefore using a steel plug is like adding a "Steel-Safety Plug" rather than "Safety Wire".
Because the Titanium Plug has a Temp Tightening Safety Factor less than 100%, or only 84%, that plug would be classified a "Titanium-Danger Plug".

Of course if we used an aluminium alloy plug having no differential expansion with the sump and therefore no hot lap thread locking, that plug would be classified an "Alloy-Danger Plug".
Similiarly steel plugs in stamped steel sumps wth no hot lap thread locking can be classified "Steel-Danger Plugs".
A long history of series and modified production car racing with early large diameter Steel-Danger Plugs with easily cross threaded fine threads might explain why Safety Wire was originally mandated for sump plugs left under tightened.

I am therefore thinking of using a Steel-Safety Plug with a plain alloy sealing washer (the standard plug) or alternatively with a Dowty Sealing Washer if the flat surface at the thread mouth will accommodate.
An aluminium Dowty Sealing Washer uses nitrile rubber sealing which will age so should be replaced every couple of years to keep working effectively.
It provides an additional elastomer seal which will keep sealing at a lower torque than a plain alloy sealing washer (secondary seal for another box to tick in case plug gets under torqued so that elastomer seal friction and resilience might dampen/stop un-torqued plug rotation induced by sump vibration).

Image

I measured a NB8B sump and sump plug at 14 mm x 1.5 mm pitch x 17mm AF on a 21.5 mm diameter head against a 1.5 mm thick plain sealing washer into an alloy threaded boss with 14 mm thread depth with a 29 mm diameter spot face in the lower side of the sump, not underneath it...perfect !

Image
Imagine this Dowty Sealing Washer where D = 22 mm, d1 = 16.4 mm, d = 14.7 mm, s = 1.5 mm seen reflected in this ebay special.
Alternatively one could stop imagining and think why change something that Mazda seem to have got so right....If it ain't broke....

For example, this alloy housing/Dowty Washer/Steel-Safety Plug system idea is further subject to a seal temperature risk assessment.
And any Titanium-Danger Plug system is subject to a thread sticking/galling risk assessment.

In my searching I came across titanium motor bike plugs with plain sealing washers.
Not sure this is such a good idea...even though 14 mm, I would not be using a rattle gun or hammer to undo a hollowed out alloy or titanium plug done up too tight, even that size.
An alloy or titanium plug would be hard to recover from being stuck too tight, but if it was tough alloy steel...who cares ?...Just hit it harder.

Motor bike alloy and titanium plugs come in fancy colours complete with added lightness and magnetism, but may come with a risk if over tightened.
Interesting to hear from anyone with more experience with them.

Image

With a "Steel-Safety Plug" already "ticking the safety box" as standard, Sparkley is safe without a chemical thread lock on cleaned threads such as "Safety Loctite" or a mechanical restraint like "Safety Wire". :D

As a point of reference, Sparkley's standard Mazda Steel-Safety Plug system has a tightening torque of 22-30 ft lbs (31-40 Nm) which is say 20% to 30% of proof load for a 14 mm diameter x 1.5 mm pitch Grade 8.8 bolt.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below are my comments posted in an MX5 Parts for Sale Group Buy thread recently and repeated here for posterity.
StillIC wrote:sump plugs are the only reasonable place I can think of, off the top of my head...

Fascinating point because plugs are not joints subject to fatigue load, but more likely subject to mechanical vibration of the sump and stress relating to differential expansion and contraction with high sump oil temperature.
If a plug has a large enough length to diameter ratio and a lower Coefficient of Expansion than the Housing it screws into, then it could potentially thread lock as the temperature increases, provided the plug was finally torqued when oil is colder than on hot laps.
Steel and Titanium plugs are obvious options to examine in this respect. In my searching I came across titanium motor bike plugs.
Below is a test of the significance of the relative properties of each plug in this respect.

Image

A titanium plug expands less than a steel plug but steel is much stiffer than titanium, so steel is the safer plug under heat by 1.47/0.84 = 175% safer.
I reckon a TTSF (Temperature Tightening Safety Factor) of 147% is good enough for such a plug to be called a "Steel-Safety Plug" and a TTSF of only 84% for a titanium plug is bad enough to be called "Titanium-Danger Plug".
(100% would be an un-torqued alloy plug in an ally sump or un-torqued steel plug in a steel sump).
That means we can simply start with "Titanium-Danger Plugs" as the base case, adding safety with "Steel-Safety Plugs" substituting for "Safety Wire" in normal "tick the box" risk assessments.

Chemical bonding like Loctite raised by StillIC, seems like a possible option for steel plugs. Maybe not for alloy or titanium plugs because of risk of fracturing an overly tight plug on removal.
Thanks StillIC, I am now inspired to improve that option to something better...a direct replacement for "Safety Wire" called "Safety Loctite".
"Safety Loctite" further provides for a virtual tick of equivalence in the "Safety Wire" tick box, needed to satisfy scrutineers during any transition to the "new normal" of no more Safety Wire.
The Safety Loctite will then be quietly dropped from the check list when mobile mechanics tell authorities they don't get time to wait for the slow drip, drip, drip, drip dripping of sump oil to finally stop oozing out over the threads they keep cleaning.

One thing, we can be sure that "burn risk" safety measures assures us that oil is always changed colder than oil on its hot laps and oil going in is colder than oil coming out.
Therefore "Steel-Safety Plugs" are assured to function as intended, particularly if the final temperature and torque of the plug is the last thing done and recorded with a mislaid pen on that little round sticker stuck to the head of the plug, and shown in a selfie to scrutineers on track day.:D

Garido
Fast Driver
Posts: 438
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:50 pm
Vehicle: NA8

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby Garido » Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:08 pm

I suddenly feel a lot less nerdy for indexing my spark plugs.

97 MXV
Racing Driver
Posts: 1052
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:51 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane Southside

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby 97 MXV » Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:36 pm

From the other Thread...
StillIC wrote:Great work Keith....but having thought about what you said, safety wire is a brilliant visual inspection device. It shows that the fastener cannot fall apart, even if it doesn't show that it can't fail. And it *suggests* that before Someone With Some Knowledge went to the extreme effort of applying the safety wire they also went to the small effort of applying some tension to the joint. But I know there are simpler, cheaper visual methods to ensure Quality. Even those that require applied torque to be double checked.

StillIC wrote:
97 MXV wrote:Actually I don't think Safety Wire is all that brilliant because it is not a smart indicator of key performance because the indicator (the presence of wire) is like a map an abstract representation, in this case of a given state of bolt torque that makes you think the bolt is performing "normally".

I accept your point, but isn't this true of all other visual inspection devices also. E.g. the paint on the fastener, the yellow pointers on the wheel nuts etc?


Agree your point is correct.
Maybe the difference is the paint and the yellow pointers are easy and cheap and don't need drilled bolts and take less time to do and undo.

So I think a bolted joint clamping things together at stress relieving temperature needing Safety Wire to function safely is a contraption.
And I think a Titanium-Danger Plug needing Safety Wire to function safely is a contraption.

So I should not blame Safety Wire because really it is actually a brilliant indicator of a contraption.
But sorry Safety Wire, I still call you a contraption because it seems the only time you serve a useful purpose in an efficient manner is when you are holding some contraption of a joint together.

Sorry if I am sounding a bit stubborn...but it is good to push the issue...both ways.

Image

StillIC
Racing Driver
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:30 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby StillIC » Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:37 pm

But we aren't arguing! :wink:
WP:1.12.492 SMPN:1.16.403 SMPS:1.05.473 SMPGP:1.53.256 SMPB:2.22.181

97 MXV
Racing Driver
Posts: 1052
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:51 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane Southside

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby 97 MXV » Mon May 01, 2017 7:02 am

StillIC wrote:But we aren't arguing! :wink:

There does not seem to be a word to describe an interesting and delightful argument.
Because we didn't just argue, I think we seriously and freely argued complete with a bit of nonsense to add fun and fog. :wink:

97 MXV
Racing Driver
Posts: 1052
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:51 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane Southside

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby 97 MXV » Mon May 01, 2017 7:57 am

Garido wrote:I suddenly feel a lot less nerdy for indexing my spark plugs.

I know and I was only going on about drain plugs.

Image

There are some who safety wire your spark plugs to rescue sick ones from their black hole.

97 MXV
Racing Driver
Posts: 1052
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:51 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane Southside

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby 97 MXV » Mon May 01, 2017 8:54 am

Indexing is rotating each plug using special washers to optimise the flame front. How exciting and nice colours too. :D

Image

Image

Thanks for opening my eyes to a new brilliant idea or useless contraption in fashion colours no one ever sees buried deep in a black hole! :twisted:

Garido
Fast Driver
Posts: 438
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:50 pm
Vehicle: NA8

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby Garido » Mon May 01, 2017 2:34 pm

97 MXV wrote:Thanks for opening my eyes to a new brilliant idea or useless contraption in fashion colours no one ever sees buried deep in a black hole! :twisted:


You're all the most welcome. I hope you never change keith.



*** still upset about those bushes. ****

StillIC
Racing Driver
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:30 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby StillIC » Mon May 01, 2017 8:25 pm

97 MXV wrote:
StillIC wrote:But we aren't arguing! :wink:

There does not seem to be a word to describe an interesting and delightful argument.
Because we didn't just argue, I think we seriously and freely argued complete with a bit of nonsense to add fun and fog. :wink:

The conventional answer is "yes we are!".
WP:1.12.492 SMPN:1.16.403 SMPS:1.05.473 SMPGP:1.53.256 SMPB:2.22.181

97 MXV
Racing Driver
Posts: 1052
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:51 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane Southside

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby 97 MXV » Tue May 02, 2017 9:02 am

StillIC wrote:The conventional answer is "yes we are!".

Can't argue with that answer StillIC. 8)

Quiz....What was wrong with this image ?
97 MXV wrote:How exciting and nice colours too. :DImage


Easy to be distracted by the "right colours" but the washers were the "wrong shape" for an MX5 spark plug.
Apparantly this is what tapered seat MX5 spark plug indexing copper washers look like.

ImageImage

Only $50 for pack of 30 on ebay, the best 4 reserved for the MX, and the 30 - 4 = 26 leftovers as Faux Haute Couture for she who must be obeyed.

Now of the 26 leftovers, 20 slide over her fingers, thumbs and toes, 2 hang from her ears leaving 4 wondering where they will end up.
Of course engineers would argue that 26-20-2 = 4 leftover is not always true because they foresee faults in the system, like web feet.

Image

Garido
Fast Driver
Posts: 438
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:50 pm
Vehicle: NA8

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby Garido » Tue May 02, 2017 1:25 pm

I normally buy a master carton of spark plugs and fiddle around. I'll eventually get the setup I want in regards to indexing. The rest are spares.

97 MXV
Racing Driver
Posts: 1052
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:51 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane Southside

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby 97 MXV » Wed May 03, 2017 12:01 pm

Garido wrote:I normally buy a master carton of spark plugs and fiddle around. I'll eventually get the setup I want in regards to indexing. The rest are spares.

That relies on plug dimensional tolerances to achieve indexing.
So one would then be faced with a choice of cheap plugs tolerance, expensive plugs indexed or expensive plugs indexed with washers.

Some points of view on plugs.
Some more points of view on plugs.

Also I imagine washered plugs might need to be different heat range to function properly.
A lot of things to consider....plugs ain't plugs.

Garido
Fast Driver
Posts: 438
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 2:50 pm
Vehicle: NA8

Re: 97 MXV's NA8 Gender Transformation

Postby Garido » Wed May 03, 2017 12:19 pm

97 MXV wrote:
Garido wrote:I normally buy a master carton of spark plugs and fiddle around. I'll eventually get the setup I want in regards to indexing. The rest are spares.

That relies on plug dimensional tolerances to achieve indexing.
So one would then be faced with a choice of cheap plugs tolerance, expensive plugs indexed or expensive plugs indexed with washers.

Some points of view on plugs.
Some more points of view on plugs.

Also I imagine washered plugs might need to be different heat range to function properly.
A lot of things to consider....plugs ain't plugs.


I'll be putting an article up when I do a build log but I'm just so lazy.... Given my 1.6 needs all the help it can get I don't mind indexing.


Return to “MX5 Garage Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests