I'm after a second set of tyres but am reluctant to get the new RSRR's. They are too noisy. I am very happy with the previous RSR's but they're no longer being made .
Has anybody got a direct comparison between the RSR and RE003? I'd expect the RSR with a rating of 140 to stick better than the RE003 with 220 but is that the case or is the difference too little to notice. I don't care about the mileage as long as I get 10 to 20k.
RSR's (old) vs RE003
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:13 pm
- Vehicle: NB SE
- NitroDann
- Forum sponsor
- Posts: 10280
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Newcastle NSW
- Contact:
Re: RSR's (old) vs RE003
This is like comparing a CT110 to a CR250
http://www.NitroDann.com
speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.
- plohl
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:13 am
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
Re: RSR's (old) vs RE003
The CT110 is definitely a better bike.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Cheers,
plohl
plohl
-
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:39 pm
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: FarSE Melbourne
Re: RSR's (old) vs RE003
plohl wrote:The CT110 is definitely a better bike.
3 million postmen couldn't be wrong....
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:13 pm
- Vehicle: NB SE
Re: RSR's (old) vs RE003
So from your experience you'd suggest the postie
http://www.theherald.com.au/story/42600 ... 0#slide=15
http://www.theherald.com.au/story/42600 ... 0#slide=15
- Luke
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 1:11 am
- Vehicle: NC
- Location: Wetherill Park NSW
Re: RSR's (old) vs RE003
I have a set of RE003's in 205/45/16 as set of wet tyres and also use them for Marulan training days.
I'm only 0.5s a lap slower on them then 20mm wider 225/45/15 Hankook RS3's. And I'm pretty sure that RS3's would be on par with RSR's.
RE003's are the quietest tyre I have ever had on my MX-5 including original Toyo's.
When you get them for the 4 for 3 offer, you can't really go wrong.
I'm only 0.5s a lap slower on them then 20mm wider 225/45/15 Hankook RS3's. And I'm pretty sure that RS3's would be on par with RSR's.
RE003's are the quietest tyre I have ever had on my MX-5 including original Toyo's.
When you get them for the 4 for 3 offer, you can't really go wrong.
2022 BRZ 10AE
2021 GR Yaris
2008 Peugeot HDi Lemans, Number 1027/2000, White with Red stripes
2021 GR Yaris
2008 Peugeot HDi Lemans, Number 1027/2000, White with Red stripes
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:13 pm
- Vehicle: NB SE
Re: RSR's (old) vs RE003
Thanks for that. Appreciated.
-
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 10:41 am
- Vehicle: NB SE
- Location: canberra
Re: RSR's (old) vs RE003
I couldn't wear out my last set of 002's in four years so last month ditched them. I had been happy so went in to get some 003's . Was talked into hankook Rs-3 semi slicks for the same price. Glad I was - for me they are quieter, smoother and really grip (haven't tried wet). Don't care that they may last 10,000 k's. I suppose any new tyre would be better than old half worn tyres though. I run 195 50 15's.
NB SE, NA 1.8.
- MX593
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 3:44 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Canberra
Re: RSR's (old) vs RE003
I bought a set of RSRs just before Christmas and they are dead fresh. 4216 made, so they must still be making them (at least in 16"). They are 205-45-16 and I got them from St George in Arncliffe $150 a corner fitted.
Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 137 guests