124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

MX5 Car Clubs of Australia

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel

Mr Morlock
Speed Racer
Posts: 6444
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Melbourne

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby Mr Morlock » Thu Dec 01, 2016 11:48 am

"Not everyone buys a MX5 cos they want a convertible... " I reckon its a fair bet that picking a convertible relates to a preference. Coupes- there are plenty; 86/BRZ are probably the best value and well engineered and even a Mustang with the turbo 4 is capable of low 14's for a 1/4 mile. Agree on looks the Nissans are like the 124 pictured.

rascal
Racing Driver
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:39 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: FarSE Melbourne

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby rascal » Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:50 pm

Mr Morlock wrote:"Not everyone buys a MX5 cos they want a convertible... " I reckon its a fair bet that picking a convertible relates to a preference.

You'd lose that bet if it was with me. I hate convertibles. Couldn't wait to ditch the soft top completely and fit a hardtop.
I do however (as StillIC pointed out) appreciate the handling, weight, & aftermarket support advantages that an MX5 provides which (for me) significantly overrides the downsides of it being a convertible.

User avatar
ManiacLachy
Engaged
Posts: 3303
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:35 pm
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Brisbane

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby ManiacLachy » Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:05 pm

Many people who drive and love MX-5s absolutely do not want a convertible. I'm not one of them, but there are plenty out there. Just because you don't understand it, MM, doesn't make it wrong.

User avatar
MattR
Racing Driver
Posts: 1305
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:26 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby MattR » Thu Dec 01, 2016 2:21 pm

StillIC wrote:
captaincabinets wrote:
Code4 wrote:240Z leapt to mind.


Ooh 240z without the rust! Was my dream car as a teenager but they cost a fortune now, due to aforementioned rust I guess.

The original 1969 built 240Zs were fully galvanised. This process was deleted some time in the build cycle. Such a shame, but perhaps to keep costs down to sell more of them.


Nope never galvanised, they had rust from the factory. There are some very good rustrtraps with the design. And my 240, an early 1970 car certainly had its fair share of tin worm.

I know of car 0019 being restored at the moment, the amount of rust was scary and kudos to the owner in resurrecting the car. It's now a bit like Grand dad's axe with what is left of teh original car and whhat has been grafted on

Mr Morlock
Speed Racer
Posts: 6444
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Melbourne

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby Mr Morlock » Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:33 pm

dont you love the logic ' I hate convertibles. Couldn't wait to ditch the soft top completely and fit a hardtop". Exactly when is a convertible not a convertible - when it has a hardtop? Why are roadsters low sellers - well just maybe because they are made for enthusiasts that like the wind in the hair or that sense of being outside instead of in a capsule shielded from the real world. The only reason for having an MX-5 is because it's the best of the roadsters in terms of fun and affordability otherwise buy a probably more capable but less fun coupe or tin top. Its a bit wimpy driving an MX-5 with the top up at least when your mates are watching. Mazda worked out years ago i.e. 3 decades ago that an MX-5 was not intended to pull ploughs or have roof racks.

rascal
Racing Driver
Posts: 1783
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:39 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: FarSE Melbourne

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby rascal » Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:23 pm

Mr Morlock wrote:The only reason for having an MX-5 is because it's the best of the roadsters in terms of fun and affordability otherwise buy a probably more capable but less fun coupe or tin top.

Delusional much?? That might be one reason but it is far from the 'only' reason..

A very big reason to own a MX5 is for the handling and track ability the car offers from standard condition and above.
There's a reason it is the most raced car on the planet and it has nothing to do with it being a convertible. (That's actually a negative that many 'fix' by fitting factory or aftermarket hardtops)


and to reiterate
ManiacLachy wrote:Just because you don't understand it, MM, doesn't make it wrong.

project.r.racing
Speed Racer
Posts: 3722
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:16 pm
Vehicle: Non MX-5
Location: Glasshouse Mountains, QLD

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby project.r.racing » Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:38 pm

Mr Morlock wrote:Its a bit wimpy driving an MX-5 with the top up at least when your mates are watching.
Do you drive through maccas car park with your top down so your mates can see you to prove you ain't wimpy?

I totally thought you are an 60-70yo because of your highly displayed out of touch views and inability to accept other views that are not yours. But it turns out you are an 18-25yo looking for non-wimpy street cred.

Odd
Fast Driver
Posts: 354
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:36 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby Odd » Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:49 pm

Yeh....no top! how dumb....
Pretty hard to get in and out of.....15cm ground clearance would be better,
Only got 2 seats....add 2 more doors and a back seat
Manual gearbox....how backward....Auto Please
Only drives rear wheels!....4 wheel drive would be better

Stuff it....I'll just buy a CX5
You can't demand respect....you have to earn it
NA8 for Fun, CX5 for carrying crap...;)

StillIC
Racing Driver
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:30 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby StillIC » Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:33 pm

MattR wrote:...snip...

Nope never galvanised, they had rust from the factory. There are some very good rustrtraps with the design. And my 240, an early 1970 car certainly had its fair share of tin worm.

I know of car 0019 being restored at the moment, the amount of rust was scary and kudos to the owner in resurrecting the car. It's now a bit like Grand dad's axe with what is left of teh original car and whhat has been grafted on

I bought a Datsun Stanza from a guy who had a 69 Z, who told me that early Zs were galvanised. He even showed me the gal where some paint was missing on the firewall. Sounds like a bare metal rebuild if he was telling an untruth!
WP:1.12.492 SMPN:1.16.403 SMPS:1.05.473 SMPGP:1.53.256 SMPB:2.22.181

User avatar
MattR
Racing Driver
Posts: 1305
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:26 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby MattR » Thu Dec 01, 2016 10:44 pm

Nope they weren't galvanised, and there is some conjecture as to whether we got any 69 builds out here.

I have owned Zeds and been around Zed workshops for more than 20 years, so hopefully a bit of knowledge has rubbed off.

User avatar
Rocky
Concerned Citizen.
Posts: 6181
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 4:42 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Queensland

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby Rocky » Thu Dec 01, 2016 11:09 pm

Ah, the "old coupe Vs convertible" chestnut.
I too hate convertibles and would have bought the MX5 in a Coupe format had that been an option.
When I went driving with our local MX5 group (when there was one) I was the only one with the HT on (and the hat and sunscreen off). Some of the guys would rag me about it, but hey, I'm all growed up and I can make my own decisions (nothing to prove to anyone).
I DO think the MX5 looks better with a HT than the coupe roofline as per the shortlived NB8A Coupe.
Image
Foundation Member: Grumpy Old Bastards Club.

greasemeup
Fast Driver
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 6:47 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT

124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby greasemeup » Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:49 am

Best of both worlds- Targa T-Top?

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

StillIC
Racing Driver
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:30 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby StillIC » Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:50 am

MattR wrote:Nope they weren't galvanised, and there is some conjecture as to whether we got any 69 builds out here.

I have owned Zeds and been around Zed workshops for more than 20 years, so hopefully a bit of knowledge has rubbed off.

We received at least one. I looked at the compliance plate and it was definitely 69. Sorry to the rest of you non Zers for the thread hijack.
WP:1.12.492 SMPN:1.16.403 SMPS:1.05.473 SMPGP:1.53.256 SMPB:2.22.181

Mr Morlock
Speed Racer
Posts: 6444
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Melbourne

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby Mr Morlock » Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:38 pm

PRR- I never go thru Maccas driver thru and my MX-5 has the top up about 5% of the time but afterall it's for fun not mundane duties. Nothing ( subjectively of course) better in motoring than open top on a good day or night with no radio or other distractions just the sound track of the exhaust and the outside world.

The-roadsters - are already an endangered species- the world moved on from the 60's when they were common- MG ,TC ,TD ,TF, MGA ,MGB ,Healey 4 and 6, Sprite ,Stag, Triumph ,TR3 4 5, Sumbeam Alpine and Tiger etc - the golden years of a vanishing breed . The car magazines struggle to find an equivalent to an MX-5 even today for comparo in price and equipment etc. The best roadster under $50K - the MX-5 wins. In desperation the testers throw in 86/ BRZ but they are not the same are they? However Mazda were very smart with the NC because it really did offer a Coupe with the touch of a button - really brilliant conversion and everyone can be happy.

"The comment; "There's a reason it is the most raced car on the planet and it has nothing to do with it being a convertible" . That surprised me- what is the source of that? Incidentally this thread was about road cars not race cars.

User avatar
Red Dragon
Racing Driver
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:21 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: melbourne

Re: 124 Fastback. Any truth in one coming ?

Postby Red Dragon » Fri Dec 02, 2016 3:44 pm

Just my 2cents worth.
If my NA was not a convertible I would not have bought an MX5.
It was with the purpose of driving with the roof down in the sunshine and enjoying the fresh air that i bought it, and i would say 99% of MX5 owners in Victoria are the same,the roof only goes up when it is raining cats and dogs.


Return to “MX5 General Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests