Battery recommendations for a dual use car

Anything to do with the MX5 and Motor Sport

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

Post Reply
User avatar
hks_kansei
Speed Racer
Posts: 6154
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Victoria

Re: Battery recommendations for a dual use car

Postby hks_kansei » Thu Mar 24, 2016 11:57 am

No issue at all with any of the lead acid batteries in there before or after.


Possibly something to do with the NA alternator regulated voltage as opposed to the NB ECU regulated one? and whatever the NC uses (presumably ECU regulated?)
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
Top
User avatar
davekmoore
Speed Racer
Posts: 4681
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:53 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Esprick, UK

Re: Battery recommendations for a dual use car

Postby davekmoore » Thu Mar 24, 2016 12:04 pm

The challenge in my car for a lead acid battery is the cornering forces. The acid doesn't want to stay in the battery.
UK since return: Standard NC2 (horrid), C200K, ND2 BBR, NC2 BBR200 (loved it), NC BBR300 (better than BARMY), V-Special, turbo NB8B (my 84th car)
Top
Muzdaman
Fast Driver
Posts: 453
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:00 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle

Re: Battery recommendations for a dual use car

Postby Muzdaman » Thu Mar 24, 2016 12:14 pm

hks_kansei wrote:No issue at all with any of the lead acid batteries in there before or after.


Possibly something to do with the NA alternator regulated voltage as opposed to the NB ECU regulated one? and whatever the NC uses (presumably ECU regulated?)


Possibly just a bad battery?
I have had a PC680 in my NA6 for 3.5 years now, still charges fine, starts fine even with high compression.
even if its left for 3 weeks starts first time.
Top
User avatar
davekmoore
Speed Racer
Posts: 4681
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:53 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Esprick, UK

Re: Battery recommendations for a dual use car

Postby davekmoore » Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:30 pm

Ned Loh wrote:
beavis wrote:Deka EXT15

that is probably fine. if you want something about the same weight, but with closer to factory spec CCA, you could try one of these (a bit more money though)
http://www.braillebattery.com.au/index. ... ies/b14115

Considered the Braille battery. Then looked at the second post down on this page http://www.miataturbo.net/race-prep-75/ ... 85/page17/
Not considering Braille battery any more.
UK since return: Standard NC2 (horrid), C200K, ND2 BBR, NC2 BBR200 (loved it), NC BBR300 (better than BARMY), V-Special, turbo NB8B (my 84th car)
Top
Ned Loh
Fast Driver
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 12:46 pm
Vehicle: Non MX-5

Re: Battery recommendations for a dual use car

Postby Ned Loh » Mon May 02, 2016 2:21 pm

davekmoore wrote:
Ned Loh wrote:
beavis wrote:

that is probably fine. if you want something about the same weight, but with closer to factory spec CCA, you could try one of these (a bit more money though)
http://www.braillebattery.com.au/index. ... ies/b14115

Considered the Braille battery. Then looked at the second post down on this page http://www.miataturbo.net/race-prep-75/ ... 85/page17/
Not considering Braille battery any more.


Thes specs on the Deka and Braille seem different, even if they are from the same factory (?). Braille has closer to factory CCA. In reality I think both will do the job just fine.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “MX5 Motor Sport”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests