Kia bought the rights form Lotus in late 1996
The M100 is a great car, I have had two

They were extremely reliable and great to drive, if you ever get a chance to take one for a drive go for it

The brakes were crap though

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel
ralt wrote:Where do you think the inspiration by Mazda and Toyota to develop 16 valve engines came from? Surprise surprise it came from the Ford bda which was in production well before it was copied by the Japanese and others and a lot easier to develop.
cjay wrote:The M100 Elan was not made by Kia, they were made at Hethel by Lotus.
davekmoore wrote:The original Elan was a lovely looking and handling car for its time. Expensive though, and expensive to maintain, regularly needing suspension work and tuning of the carburetors. A highly tuned, highly strung big valve version gave the same power as a modern day completely docile ND 1.5L which only needs servicing every 10,000kms.
This looks like a decent one at $50k though: http://www.carsales.com.au/private/deta ... 3176/?Cr=2
Or for well under $40k you can have a new ND.
In a similar vein I had a potential customer today who wasn't sure whether to spend $40k on a "fully restored" (slow, dangerous, evil handling) MGB or about $37k on an ND. The MGB will need restoring again by 2026. And the ND .............. won't.
ralt wrote:What does " dis " mean?
oppolock wrote:I have just ordered a 2.0 ND, maybe to relive old memories. But it will need a bit of engine work to keep up with my old Elan.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests