MX5 ND 2015 OFFICIAL ANCAP CRASH TEST VIDEO

MX5 Car Clubs of Australia

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel

ND-MX5GT2.0
Driver
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 10:50 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT

MX5 ND 2015 OFFICIAL ANCAP CRASH TEST VIDEO

Postby ND-MX5GT2.0 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 1:28 am

As started. Offical crash test video of ND of anyone is interested!

Sorry I meant EURO NCAP*

http://youtu.be/UIjhKoISJyM

Cheers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Marco_NB8A
Learner Driver
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 8:15 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Canberra

Re: MX5 ND 2015 OFFICIAL ANCAP CRASH TEST VIDEO

Postby Marco_NB8A » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:52 am

NCAP has lost its way. Four stars because it doesn't have auto emergency braking - but that won't actually help you AFTER you've hit something....which was the whole point of NCAP testing.

Maybe there needs to be two tests: primary safety, ie crash avoidance, which would test these types of safety features plus braking distance, roadholding, overtaking performance etc. And then secondary safety, which is how well the car protects its occupants in a crash.

ND-MX5GT2.0
Driver
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 10:50 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT

Re: MX5 ND 2015 OFFICIAL ANCAP CRASH TEST VIDEO

Postby ND-MX5GT2.0 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:56 am

I thought it was partly todo with no hard top roof as well as the braking?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
Vat
Racing Driver
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 9:14 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: SW Brisbane

Re: MX5 ND 2015 OFFICIAL ANCAP CRASH TEST VIDEO

Postby Vat » Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:14 am

Marco_NB8A wrote:NCAP has lost its way. Four stars because it doesn't have auto emergency braking - but that won't actually help you AFTER you've hit something....which was the whole point of NCAP testing.

Maybe there needs to be two tests: primary safety, ie crash avoidance, which would test these types of safety features plus braking distance, roadholding, overtaking performance etc. And then secondary safety, which is how well the car protects its occupants in a crash.


There was a bit more than just the lack of auto emergency braking - the report can be found here: http://euroncap.blob.core.windows.net/m ... asheet.pdf

Results for the driver in the front offset were adequate for the chest, legs and head. Lateral impact result for the driver was adequate for the chest in the car test, marginal for the pole test.

I'd suggest the impact test results were sufficient for the four star result. Let's face it - a one tonne car four metres long is never going to make four stars.

I don't have a problem with the NCAP being used to push safety advances like auto braking, safety belt reminders, traction control, ABS, ESC all that sort of stuff. Like all drivers, we're all above average here, but cars are used in the real world where people are on the phone, the road network is a mass of poor design, maintenance and distractions. Anything that can be used to prevent the 'real world' driver running their hatchback into the back of my car while they text is fine by me.
'98 Evo Gold NB8A
QR-Clubman 66.5109|Sprint 63.3635|Sportsman 67.4673|National 92.3481|Lakeside 65.7478|MP K 1:35.382|MP E 1:16.422|NM 1:08.017


Return to “MX5 General Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests