Hi all
Now I'm back into MX5 ownership, thought I would post here (before it goes for ever) the outline of my s/c install on a new 1997 MX5 (it was a 1.8i in England which meant no power steering nor ABS which helps with engine bay space) in the UK. I did it in 1998 while still under warranty. I was young... ;-)
This may help anyone looking to do it. The best addition was the active knock sensor which I think meant I advanced the timing to either 14 degrees BTDC. Happy to help but it was a few years.
Background
Having tried a number of methods to increase the somewhat feeble (in my opinion) power of the MX-5, certainly when contending with those people in Britain driving MGFs (who have an additional 13bhp over the MX-5), I needed something with more ooommpphh! Forced induction seemed the best way to go.
Firstly, I had to choose between the s/charger and turbo charging. Simple put, the t/c relies on the exhaust gases - blowing these out of the system. The s/c runs on the inlet, so pressurises the air before it reaches the engine. There are numerous possibilities on the web that involve both options - the question was to determine which would be the best and most efficient. It was also governed by price, so I needed the best available at the right price. There were t/c and s/c models available - both of which were about $2395, so I sent e-mails to the appropriate people and gauged feedback. As suspected, their own system is always the better one - it is hard to determine which is the best option.
After deliberating, I resolved to go for the s/c, to be honest it was purely down to the fact that I liked the idea of having something which required minimal maintenance as well as no turbo lag - and a s/c has always impressed me with the low down torque offered. It also required slightly less "plumbing" than a turbo.
Following conversations with Performance Buyers Club in the USA, I determined that they could offer me the s/c and a J&S knock sensor which I was told was good to have (having now fitted this, I would recommend that is you are spending $2,400 on the s/c, you definitely need the knock sensor to get the best from it).
I will say that Performance Buyers Club were not the most efficient outfit. Numerous e-mails went unanswered and when they were answered it was very curt and generally missed the majority of questions. There are other places to try selling the same goods who may be similar - I can only report on my experience.
I had my s/c shipped to an address in the USA while there on business and I brought it home. Beware - it is one hell of a big box!
The original car before the cut and pasting began!
Fitting
There are loads of parts, and it is very daunting when you open the package. Some elements of the kit are excellent -all well labelled and obvious. Others become apparent as you do the installation, as parts which seemed strange or irrelevant then appear to make sense. Do what the installation manual says - lay every part out and ensure that you have everything. It takes time, but it makes sense. I have to say the actual kit is a work of art - you get a buzz just looking at it. The anticipation was building...
I stayed with a friend (cheers Devin - who, incidentally, also took the bloody good quality photos you see on this page) who is an engineer, so that he could assist. The quoted installation time of five hours is very optimistic - you have to know MX-5s well to do this. We took seven hours - one hour of which was spent puzzling out an issue with the idler pulley - resolved easily enough but more of this later.
Bear in mind that my car is RHD. While the instructions have been altered for RHD, they have never actually set-up on up on this model year car, and therefore some things are not relevant. The key one is the throttle cable, which needs modification.
The fitting started well. All is OK and the instructions clearly point out what to do when. Having two people helps enormously - one can put parts together while the other dismantles. I was also fortunate in that my car was 15 months old - none of the bolts were that tight, especially on the manifold. However, make sure you have a good comprehensive toolkit.
Installation is a matter of following the instructions. However, below are the problems encountered (I hope this was all of them):
1 - The throttle cable needed some adjustment to fit (the throttle body is moved, therefore you have to take out the old cable and use the new one supplied. This does not route that well). When first installed, it remained slack. The mounting bracket under the s/c used a one inch long washer to set the adjustment. We had to cut this in half, mounting the throttle in-between the two sections to get a good quality cable connection. Easy solution.
2 - The idler pulley - this is the big one, and the place where the instructions fall down. The booklet provides information for all 1.8 RHD MX5s, whether they have PAS, ABS and A/C or not). It doesn't break these down into sections; rather, and somewhat confusingly, tries to combine them for ease of use. It doesn't work. Basically, the idler pulley is just a rotating pulley that allows the belt to get a better grip on the s/c pulley. It re-routes the belt to give it a greater "holding" range on the s/c. The diagrams generally refer to a pulley system which uses two pulleys and includes the brackets to make this work. We spent one hour trying to get the space to get the two pulleys on. They wouldn't go. By chance we began investigating other options, including using just one pulley (which is referred to but in less details and in a totally different section). This was the answer as the pictures show.
A different view, showing the dummy throttle body (the gaping hole!) and black idler pulley
Preparing for installation - note the position of gold angled fixer bracket
3 - Getting the belt onto the s/c was a pain, but do read the instructions. As long as someone holds the belt on, rocking the car, so a backward slope, does the trick.
We did have issues with squeaking idler pulley. Eventually cured when the fantastic people in Moss Motors in the USA (always deal with them if you can - in contrary to last issues letter, Moss Motors USA were very customer focused). A number of replacement idler pulleys were sent, including an adaptation from plastic to aluminium. This worked a treat!
4 - On cars without ABS, the screen washer bottle needs to be relocated. This is easily done by moving the bottle to the right, when looking at the engine bay from the front of the car. It is at a slight angle, as identified by the pictures, but still works fine.
5 - There is a breather/vacuum pipe that must be reinstalled, running from the cam cover (by the oil cap) to the inlet pipe. This is the pipe, on the pictures, that stands above the rest of the engine. It's unusual shape is dictated by its previous position, where it wrapped around the manifold. The instructions discuss a plastic restrictor which is located inside this pipe, that must be kept when you remove it. Well, when I removed mine, there was no restrictor. Without a restrictor, but with the s/c in place, the idling is very lumpy. Amazingly, further investigation revealed that some cars have this, and others don't. So, whatever you do, make sure you get one. Your local Mazda dealer can locate it on the system (mine was flown in from Belgium specially) at a cost of 58 pence. Install that, and it idles fine.
Arrow highlights the hose and where the plastic nozzle fits
Close up of s/c mouting bracket with the heat shield removed
The J&S Knock Sensor takes some setting up, but it makes all the difference. Without it, the car pinks unless the ignition is retarded to 8 degrees, thus losing loads of low-down torque. With the sensor working, ignition can be advanced to 14 degrees and the system handles the rest.
And - what fun! I love this car. The s/c has now been in place for 16 months and the last 12 have been trouble free. It requires no maintenance, servicing is fine with the local Mazda dealer and the car runs great. I would estimate that with the revised exhaust rear box I have (Borla), the car is pumping out about 185bhp. It whistles beautifully on full throttle, has great acceleration whipping most other cars (and ALL MGFs) and has a lovely sound when the engine is shut-off as the valve releases the air pressure. Classic supercharging in action.
If you were thinking about it, then I'd certainly recommend it. Once fitted it really is maintenance free. Order a spare belt with the kit as they are impossible to get over here, but very easy to source State-side.
And as for Fitz (pictured) he's fine. Regrettably I have now moved to Australia, and am happy to say that P661 FPK has found a new home. All I shall add is that should you see a green MX-5 going past you at high speed, it may just have an addition under the bonnet!
Oh, and if anyone else is thinking about fitting an s/c, and would like assistance or advice, they are more than welcome to contact me via this site. Good luck to anyone giving it a go - it's worth it!
Supercharger installation - NA, 1997, UK spec
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy
-
- Driver
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 3:04 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
Supercharger installation - NA, 1997, UK spec
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:52 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Lugarno, Sydney
Re: Supercharger installation - NA, 1997, UK spec
What do you mean by "regrettably I have moved to australia"?
Now that I've mentioned the elephant in the room, I'd like to mention a few things.
No intercooler is just robbing you of power. Suspect your inlet temps would be in the 90s instead of 40s.
Whats the go with the ecu, I mean you mention knock sensor several times, do you not have an aftermarket ecu?
Are you still running the stock exhaust? If so, more power loss.
What about injectors?
There are a few of us on here with mp45s from the BMW mini.
I chose my SC for similar reasons to you but the cost was significantly cheaper, being used.
Bang for buck it is no contest. A turbo is far more efficient and will accelerate faster.
Saying that, I've had my share of turbo cars and was looking for something different with only 'a bit' more oomph (Also just as you), as I didn't want driveline issues and no choice but an expensive clutch ;)
Here's a pic for quick reference.
(Not finished yet but close-ish)
Now that I've mentioned the elephant in the room, I'd like to mention a few things.
No intercooler is just robbing you of power. Suspect your inlet temps would be in the 90s instead of 40s.
Whats the go with the ecu, I mean you mention knock sensor several times, do you not have an aftermarket ecu?
Are you still running the stock exhaust? If so, more power loss.
What about injectors?
There are a few of us on here with mp45s from the BMW mini.
I chose my SC for similar reasons to you but the cost was significantly cheaper, being used.
Bang for buck it is no contest. A turbo is far more efficient and will accelerate faster.
Saying that, I've had my share of turbo cars and was looking for something different with only 'a bit' more oomph (Also just as you), as I didn't want driveline issues and no choice but an expensive clutch ;)
Here's a pic for quick reference.
(Not finished yet but close-ish)
NA6 turbo - 140kw atw - not the most powerful but so much fun
-
- Driver
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 3:04 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
Re: Supercharger installation - NA, 1997, UK spec
Ah - how words can be misinterpreted! Regrettably (and this was back in 1999) I did not take the car with me so regrettably that the car did not come with me since I never even really considered taking it with me at the time. Nothing to do with Aus, totally to do with the car having spent a fortune on it... not an elephant, but a choice of words that was not meant as it may appear so my apologies.
Agree that an intercooler would have helped but this was about doing something relatively easy for more power which is what it achieved and having fun while learning at the same time. As for the ECU, just used the OEM one and by running an active knock sensor meant we could advance the timing and it worked pretty well. Certainly not saying it;s the best or right solution but it was the one offered at the time. And this was almost 20 years ago - things have changed a lot since then. There was a different exhaust system yes, and stock injectors.
This was not about making as much power as possible - sure it was a work in progress and I may well have done more but it was putting about about 180bhp instead the standard 130bhp so it made it a nice upgrade. At 80mph on the motorway, if you floored it, it was max boost and pulled like a train and would hit 100-110mph without an issue and made it great fun.
It was a good fun experiment which I thoroughly enjoyed. Until I over tightened the ruddy thing and cracked the cylinder head resulting in a brand new one being required! Not everything went to plan!
Agree that an intercooler would have helped but this was about doing something relatively easy for more power which is what it achieved and having fun while learning at the same time. As for the ECU, just used the OEM one and by running an active knock sensor meant we could advance the timing and it worked pretty well. Certainly not saying it;s the best or right solution but it was the one offered at the time. And this was almost 20 years ago - things have changed a lot since then. There was a different exhaust system yes, and stock injectors.
This was not about making as much power as possible - sure it was a work in progress and I may well have done more but it was putting about about 180bhp instead the standard 130bhp so it made it a nice upgrade. At 80mph on the motorway, if you floored it, it was max boost and pulled like a train and would hit 100-110mph without an issue and made it great fun.
It was a good fun experiment which I thoroughly enjoyed. Until I over tightened the ruddy thing and cracked the cylinder head resulting in a brand new one being required! Not everything went to plan!
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:52 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Lugarno, Sydney
Re: Supercharger installation - NA, 1997, UK spec
Haha I knew what you meant but was just grilling you all the same ;)
Always good to see another supercharged mx5
Always good to see another supercharged mx5
NA6 turbo - 140kw atw - not the most powerful but so much fun
-
- Driver
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 3:04 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
Re: Supercharger installation - NA, 1997, UK spec
speed wrote:Haha I knew what you meant but was just grilling you all the same ;)
Always good to see another supercharged mx5
And you think that's funny ;-)
I often wonder where it is now and if it still has it on. The car was only a year old when I installed it so should have had lots of life... never mind.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests