What ratio diff?
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:46 am
- Vehicle: NA6 - Turbo
- Location: Perth WA
What ratio diff?
I am currently looking at upgrading my 1.6 LSD, ratio 4.3 to a 1.8 set up for more strength. I have a turbo and around 180hp. Would people recommend I go with a 4.3 ratio again or would I be better with 4.1 for track work?
Thanks
Thanks
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: What ratio diff?
The difference between a 4.1 and a 4.3 is minimal.
The 4.1 is only 5% taller than a 4.3, so at 100kph with a 4.1 the engine RPM will be 150rpm lower.
The 4.3 ring and pinion from the 1.6 diff won't fit on a 1.8 diff.
And finding a 4.3 to fit a 1.8 is somewhat difficult (Mazda factory ratios were 4.1, 3.9 and 3.6)
The 4.1 is only 5% taller than a 4.3, so at 100kph with a 4.1 the engine RPM will be 150rpm lower.
The 4.3 ring and pinion from the 1.6 diff won't fit on a 1.8 diff.
And finding a 4.3 to fit a 1.8 is somewhat difficult (Mazda factory ratios were 4.1, 3.9 and 3.6)
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
-
- Driver
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:20 pm
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: On the road, who knows where next
Re: What ratio diff?
Japanese NB6's had a 4.3 T2 in the large size diff. This would be the ideal diff for you.
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:32 pm
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: Perth W.A.
Re: What ratio diff?
[quote="hks_kansei"]The difference between a 4.1 and a 4.3 is minimal.
The 4.1 is only 5% taller than a 4.3, so at 100kph with a 4.1 the engine RPM will be 150rpm lower.
The 4.3 ring and pinion from the 1.6 diff won't fit on a 1.8 diff.
And finding a 4.3 to fit a 1.8 is somewhat difficult (Mazda factory ratios were 4.1, 3.9 and 3.6)[/quote]
Nicky does a bit of the short track autokhana as well, would that help in certain situations that you have to change to 3rd because 2nd hits the limiter just before you get to a cone? I'm not sure so asking people that have these experiences with their setup, I can supply her 4.1 or 4.3 Torsen, just wanting her to get the best diff for here needs.
The 4.1 is only 5% taller than a 4.3, so at 100kph with a 4.1 the engine RPM will be 150rpm lower.
The 4.3 ring and pinion from the 1.6 diff won't fit on a 1.8 diff.
And finding a 4.3 to fit a 1.8 is somewhat difficult (Mazda factory ratios were 4.1, 3.9 and 3.6)[/quote]
Nicky does a bit of the short track autokhana as well, would that help in certain situations that you have to change to 3rd because 2nd hits the limiter just before you get to a cone? I'm not sure so asking people that have these experiences with their setup, I can supply her 4.1 or 4.3 Torsen, just wanting her to get the best diff for here needs.
- beavis
- Forum sponsor
- Posts: 1405
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:31 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B - Turbo
- Location: Melbourne
Re: What ratio diff?
Assuming a 5 speed. I'd go 3.9 or 4.1.
Turbo NB Build Thread | BeavisMotorsport.com | YouTube.com/bbeavis | Cars: NA6, NA8-VVT, NB-Turbo, ND-2L
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:32 pm
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: Perth W.A.
Re: What ratio diff?
it's a 5 speed.
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: What ratio diff?
spikey wrote:Nicky does a bit of the short track autokhana as well, would that help in certain situations that you have to change to 3rd because 2nd hits the limiter just before you get to a cone? I'm not sure so asking people that have these experiences with their setup, I can supply her 4.1 or 4.3 Torsen, just wanting her to get the best diff for here needs.
Road speed at 7,000rpm in 2nd (on a 5 speed) is approximately:
4.3 - 93.61kph
4.1 - 98.18kph
So the 4.1 would only buy another 5kph give or take.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
- StanTheMan
- Forum legend
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Balgowlah
Re: What ratio diff?
If the focus of your driving is road....I'd go 4.1 especially with 180 hp
if your focus is on tracking your car.....4.3
if your focus is on tracking your car.....4.3
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:46 am
- Vehicle: NA6 - Turbo
- Location: Perth WA
Re: What ratio diff?
Hi guys, yes my focus is on tracking the car. I think I might stick with the 4.3 if there is minimal difference. I dont drive on massive tracks with huge straights. Appreciate your help
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: What ratio diff?
The basic way to look at it.
With the current 4.3 have you ever wished for more speed? if not, keep it.
If yes, look at a different ratio (bearing in mind the 4.3 to 4.1 difference is only 5%)
Ordinarily i'd just say use the 4.1 since it's so close to the 4.3, and a lot easier to find for the 1.8 diff.
BUT, since you've got a 4.3 available already, use that. It will be easier, and also means your speedo will still be accurate.
With the current 4.3 have you ever wished for more speed? if not, keep it.
If yes, look at a different ratio (bearing in mind the 4.3 to 4.1 difference is only 5%)
Ordinarily i'd just say use the 4.1 since it's so close to the 4.3, and a lot easier to find for the 1.8 diff.
BUT, since you've got a 4.3 available already, use that. It will be easier, and also means your speedo will still be accurate.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
- Dweezle
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:51 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Sydney
Re: What ratio diff?
Being Turbo, would you not want to lengthen the ratios so that you can ride the midrange turbo torque for longer??
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
ALL MUSCLE CARS ARE CRAP
Jeremy Clarkson
except of course, the Almighty VIPER!!!!
Jeremy Clarkson
except of course, the Almighty VIPER!!!!
- Dan
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:27 pm
- Vehicle: NC
- Location: Sydney
Re: What ratio diff?
For a turbo, generally speaking you want the lowest final drive you can have which allows you to have the turbo at full boost coming out of the corners as that reduces shifting on the straights, avoids you having difficult late shifts into corners and reduces problems with shifts shortly after corners.
On NSW tracks (SMSP and Wakefield) the lower speed corners are around 70km/h. My car has a 4.1 with 235/45/17 tyres and with that set up 70km is around 4000RPM in third which is good enough to get drive out of the corners and the higher speed corners I don't have trouble keeping over 4000RPM in 4th/5th.
If my car was a turbo that hits full boost at at 4200RPM I'd want a higher final drive to have more revs and full boost exiting the corner but if my car hit full boost at 4000RPM I'd be happy with the 4.1. In both situations I'd be unhappy with the stock 3.7 as I would either need to downshift to second which creates a more difficult shift into the corner and an extra shift after the corner or be out of boost while the turbo spools.
If you can't make a decision based on track speeds then I'd say bigger is probably better.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
On NSW tracks (SMSP and Wakefield) the lower speed corners are around 70km/h. My car has a 4.1 with 235/45/17 tyres and with that set up 70km is around 4000RPM in third which is good enough to get drive out of the corners and the higher speed corners I don't have trouble keeping over 4000RPM in 4th/5th.
If my car was a turbo that hits full boost at at 4200RPM I'd want a higher final drive to have more revs and full boost exiting the corner but if my car hit full boost at 4000RPM I'd be happy with the 4.1. In both situations I'd be unhappy with the stock 3.7 as I would either need to downshift to second which creates a more difficult shift into the corner and an extra shift after the corner or be out of boost while the turbo spools.
If you can't make a decision based on track speeds then I'd say bigger is probably better.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
2009 NC2 - Ohlins (7kg/5kg), Whiteline Sways, Weds TC105N (17x8), OEM Hardtop & 2009 987.2 Boxster
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:46 am
- Vehicle: NA6 - Turbo
- Location: Perth WA
Re: What ratio diff?
OK, so Ive gone for the 4.3 Torsen LSD 1.8 litre upgrade thanks to Spikey. He supplied me with the diff, drive shafts and prop shaft and did a great job. Thanks for you input guys
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:32 pm
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: Perth W.A.
Re: What ratio diff?
Your welcome Nicky
Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests