madkeen wrote:NOTE: I am worried they're going to sit very close to my fibreglass Lack Stewart airbox, creating possible melting issues as well as general heating up of engine bay air temp.
Someone suggested shielding earlier so to get back on topic I thought I'd post something that shows why shielding is sometimes more effective to stop heat radiating onto parts and potentially melting them rather than a coating.
Here's a thread about the need for manifold heat shields on the Evo X
http://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-x- ... -fire.htmlAs you can see in the photo this car was running a coating and my Evo X has the same burn holes on the firewall after using a coated manifold without shielding. People who are running a manifold heat shield like I run now don't seem to have the same problem.
I know it's not the same car but I think it illustrates how shielding can sometimes be more effective in preventing parts from being damaged due to proximity to heat even if the part has a coating on it.
The 'track dog racing' heat shield is what I'm considering getting for my NC to shield the headers, it's not urgent as shielding is probably not required as it doesn't seem to get stupid hot but it couldn't hurt.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
2009 NC2 - Ohlins (7kg/5kg), Whiteline Sways, Weds TC105N (17x8), OEM Hardtop & 2009 987.2 Boxster