turbo question
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, The American, Lokiel, -alex, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, Sean
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:38 pm
- Vehicle: NB SE
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
turbo question
Hey guys just had a question about an engine rebuild. . Why would someone use an NA cylinder head on a NB SE engine rebuild?
Cheers,
Brad
Cheers,
Brad
- davekmoore
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 4681
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:53 am
- Vehicle: NC
- Location: Esprick, UK
Re: turbo question
Both are non-VVT?
UK since return: Standard NC2 (horrid), C200K, ND2 BBR, NC2 BBR200 (loved it), NC BBR300 (better than BARMY), V-Special, turbo NB8B (my 84th car)
- slug_dub
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:02 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
turbo question
There's a much wider availability of hot cams for the non VVT head which is an important consideration depending on your application. Edit: though yes the SE head is not VVT anyway!
I seem to recall sailaholic saying once that the NA8 head has more potential for porting than NB heads too, but I might be wrong about that so not a for sure thing.
I seem to recall sailaholic saying once that the NA8 head has more potential for porting than NB heads too, but I might be wrong about that so not a for sure thing.
The American wrote:hella sic stance flushing pard harker yolo something something.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 11854
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
- Vehicle: Clubman
- Location: Melbourne
Re: turbo question
NA8 uses a BP05 head, whereas NB8A (VICS) & NB8 SE uses a BP4W head. NB8B & NB8C (VVT) uses a different head again. Another reason is BP4W heads were/are scarce & expensive, although becoming more common as NB8A's become older.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:49 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Purga, QLD
Re: turbo question
Look at using a BP low port head with a high port cam cover. There are more options for porting using the low port head.
- ManiacLachy
- Forum Guru
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:35 pm
- Vehicle: NB SE
- Location: Brisbane
Re: turbo question
I know MrBrad is in the market for an SE, so with that in mind I guess he's asking if he should be wary of someone selling an SE with a built engine using an NA cylinder head, or if it sounds a bit suspect?
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 11854
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
- Vehicle: Clubman
- Location: Melbourne
Re: turbo question
93_Clubman wrote:NB8B & NB8C (VVT) uses a different head again.
BP6D
-
- Driver
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:20 pm
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: On the road, who knows where next
Re: turbo question
I would check the casting marks on the rear of the cylinder head. If it is a 'BP05' head then the intake manifold will not line up and you need an adapter or modification to fit. In factory form the BP05 head does not flow as well as the later BP4W BP6D high port heads
The only reason to use an NA head would be for something highly modified.
The only reason to use an NA head would be for something highly modified.
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: turbo question
sheep wrote:The only reason to use an NA head would be for something highly modified.
Or it's cheaper.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
-
- Driver
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:20 pm
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: On the road, who knows where next
Re: turbo question
hks_kansei wrote:sheep wrote:The only reason to use an NA head would be for something highly modified.
Or it's cheaper.
Is it? The intake manifold doesn't fit... So add the cost of modifying the SE manifold to fit... And deal with the fact that it won't fit well, I would say an NB head would be a far better option. Unless said SE has an NA8 intake manifold on it, which wouldn't bother me but it's no longer how an SE was intended. I have had plenty of experience when it comes to rework to change a 'cheaper option' back to the correct option.
This is also assuming the NA head has all of the SE valve train swapped over... Surely no one would leave the HLA's in there?
- NitroDann
- Forum sponsor
- Posts: 10280
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Newcastle NSW
- Contact:
Re: turbo question
The SE was never intended to be the ultimate, it was intended to be what could be achieved under Californian emissions laws at the end of a dying model.
So while I understand a possible want to keep an SE original, only someone who has never dríven a well sorted NA8 turbo would have a problem with an NA head/manifold on a well sorted SE. If the car has an aftermarket ECU an NA8 head manifold and sensors makes a LOT of sense, ask the guys with aftermarket ECU controlled SE's about the myriad of issues they have had trying to run the SE's electronics on aftermarket ecu's back in the day before they were well supported, many to this day still run NA alternators for this reason.
Its such a common thing here to see SE fans who have never dríven other models with turbochargers to type out responses as if the SE is the epitome of what a turbo MX5 can be. Im sorry but it was never designed to be that.
Dann
So while I understand a possible want to keep an SE original, only someone who has never dríven a well sorted NA8 turbo would have a problem with an NA head/manifold on a well sorted SE. If the car has an aftermarket ECU an NA8 head manifold and sensors makes a LOT of sense, ask the guys with aftermarket ECU controlled SE's about the myriad of issues they have had trying to run the SE's electronics on aftermarket ecu's back in the day before they were well supported, many to this day still run NA alternators for this reason.
Its such a common thing here to see SE fans who have never dríven other models with turbochargers to type out responses as if the SE is the epitome of what a turbo MX5 can be. Im sorry but it was never designed to be that.
Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com
speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.
-
- Driver
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:20 pm
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: On the road, who knows where next
Re: turbo question
NitroDann wrote:The SE was never intended to be the ultimate, it was intended to be what could be achieved under Californian emissions laws at the end of a dying model.
So while I understand a possible want to keep an SE original, only someone who has never dríven a well sorted NA8 turbo would have a problem with an NA head/manifold on a well sorted SE. If the car has an aftermarket ECU an NA8 head manifold and sensors makes a LOT of sense, ask the guys with aftermarket ECU controlled SE's about the myriad of issues they have had trying to run the SE's electronics on aftermarket ecu's back in the day before they were well supported, many to this day still run NA alternators for this reason.
Its such a common thing here to see SE fans who have never dríven other models with turbochargers to type out responses as if the SE is the epitome of what a turbo MX5 can be. Im sorry but it was never designed to be that.
Dann
The only reason I would use the NA head is if it was heavily ported, because only then, will it out flow the NB head. In any case, I don't think we're talking about that level of engine here. The engine in question (assuming) has had the head replaced to rectify a failure, not for any performance goals...
My concern is why not repair the SE using the correct (or closer to) parts. If the SE in question has a standard turbo arrangement, standard cams, and a stock NA or NB head, then the NB head is the better option is it not? The extra costs involved in buying a used NB head are outweighed when you factor in what it takes to use the NB manifold on the NA head. If you do use the NA manifold, then it's cheaper, but the NA head still does not flow as well as the NB head in stock form. The SE that was for sale a while ago had the NB manifold, so I can only assume the holes were redrilled or flanges swapped. This adds to the cost, making the NB head a far better option. Regarding Aftermarket ECU issues, the head plays little to no part in this.
It is also possible that an NA8 engine was used if the SE threw a rod. This would be done to retain the oil/coolant ports on the block, but again, if it was me, I would pair another NA8 block with an NB8A head to get as close to correct as possible for an SE.
This is all just speculation and opinion. Forums are a great source of both if that's what you're after, but if you want more factual information, OP should discuss this with one of the many MX5 workshops around. Perhaps a chat with the guys that built the engine, followed by a second opinion?
- NitroDann
- Forum sponsor
- Posts: 10280
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Newcastle NSW
- Contact:
Re: turbo question
Lol, I run a workshop that specialises in turbocharging and upgrading turbocharged MX5's.
Dann
Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com
speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.
-
- Driver
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:20 pm
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: On the road, who knows where next
Re: turbo question
NitroDann wrote:Lol, I run a workshop that specialises in turbocharging and upgrading turbocharged MX5's.
Dann
Ok
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:04 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: North West, NSW
Re: turbo question
NitroDann wrote:Lol, I run a workshop that specialises in turbocharging and upgrading turbocharged MX5's.
Dann
Ahh...I nearly cracked up. In all fairness, not everyone would know that. Plus you also had one mad little NA.
So will you be finished with my exhaust before Saturday?
Return to “MX5 Forced induction (Turbo/Supercharger)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 241 guests