Nevyn72 wrote:People also need to stop being so hung up on a single 'peak' number, 'area under the curve' is probably just as, if not more, important!
I think the best option for all concerned is to be a little patient and see what is officially released and more importantly how it actually drives in the real world rather than on paper!

Unfortunately peak figures is often the only comparable data supplied by car manufacturers.
Would be great if they supplied dyno sheets atw power with all accessories on. Same goes for fuel consumption. Basically I would encourage real world data and not the BS they (all manufacturers) give us now.
bruce wrote:Not fussed as I don't have the desire to buy one. Maybe in 10 or 20 years when they're cheaper.
I feel the same.
Pitty the Honda S2000 was not considered the bench mark for a NA 2.0 L inline 4.
As I'm sure no mx5 enthusiasts would complain about having that level of power in the base engine.
Unfortunately for us there are many kinds of people in this world that wouldn't now the difference, yet they still buy cars.
Perhaps Mazda should make 3 versions.
1.5 poverty pack. 2.0 with the fruit and a bare bones 2.0 screamer that is lighter, has more power, better brakes, suspension, driveline etc. ooh and seats that are harness ready and a roll bar, so basically a track friendly version ready to go.
Or I will just stop dreaming

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk