Mr Morlock wrote:Taminga has his say and I pretty much agree then the next post is more speculation and another silly photo.
Speculation, imagination, desire, dreams ... why we're all here .....
Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel
Mr Morlock wrote:Taminga has his say and I pretty much agree then the next post is more speculation and another silly photo.
davekmoore wrote:I sell Mazdas for a living and I'm quite happy to tell everyone everything I find out as soon as I find it out. Hopefully that'll help avoid the need for further guesswork, conjecture and wishful thinking?
Everyone seems to hate the rear, I think it looks awesome in person.
The engine is mounted incredibly low and far back in the chassis, which should make for excellent weight distribution.
JBT wrote:More engine room photos: http://autoweek.com/article/car-news/2016-mazda-miata-engine-our-closest-look-yet
Jeo wrote:Didn't the NC have that?
JBT wrote:They put one of those 'sound tube' type things on the NC2 - what a joke.
Nevyn72 wrote:JBT wrote:They put one of those 'sound tube' type things on the NC2 - what a joke.
Yeah, a bit of a joke but it looks like it would be an easy thing to delete and should help to clean up the engine bay a fair bit.....
Mr Morlock wrote:it's clear it's gone down well
KevGoat wrote:To be fair to Mr.M, the majority of opinion has been reasonably favorable...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests