I remember doing mine. It took 6 minute and didn't read the instructions and the pics on the box pretty much surviced.gslender wrote:project.r.racing wrote:It is a Da Plane thread. It will only get worse.
True that! I was actually surprised nobody commented on how he spent a day putting the air filter together... but then figured maybe it was as complicated as the wheel boss kit... the guy doesn't get a break with missing instructions and complicated components... !!
Intake Options
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3722
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:16 pm
- Vehicle: Non MX-5
- Location: Glasshouse Mountains, QLD
Re: Intake Options
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3722
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:16 pm
- Vehicle: Non MX-5
- Location: Glasshouse Mountains, QLD
Re: Intake Options
Yeah sorry. I really should have put a simley emoticon thingo in my post to show jokes/sarcasm. I understand the MX5 has no great way to redo the poor coolent system it begun with.sailaholic wrote:Project R, I did mention it was far from ideal, the intake has only been like that since the police said I can't run socks. The current abortion is there because the reroute blocks the rest of the cross over (the reason I went to socks in the first place). I'm planning remove / redesign the reroute based on a different radiator but wanted to show i had done something if I met the police again.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 7468
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:49 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Purga, QLD
Re: Intake Options
Sailaholic I understood why yours was done that way
Dammm I should have nested some quotes!
Dammm I should have nested some quotes!
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: Intake Options
sailaholic wrote:Their stated issue was not the exposed element but that the oil filters socks can catch alight if the engine back fires. See the note on the minor pods PDF about filters should be flame retardant.
While I'm still running a sock I'm hoping that having it removed from the direct flame path will make it ok until I mange something better.
Maybe I've missed a middle step, (and I can't see pics on the work computer) but why not simply use non-oiled filters?
Or is it a matter of there not being any decent dry filters available that will fit? (perhaps motorbike ones?)
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3722
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:16 pm
- Vehicle: Non MX-5
- Location: Glasshouse Mountains, QLD
Re: Intake Options
The only non oil filter is a paper filter.hks_kansei wrote:sailaholic wrote:Their stated issue was not the exposed element but that the oil filters socks can catch alight if the engine back fires. See the note on the minor pods PDF about filters should be flame retardant.
While I'm still running a sock I'm hoping that having it removed from the direct flame path will make it ok until I mange something better.
Maybe I've missed a middle step, (and I can't see pics on the work computer) but why not simply use non-oiled filters?
Or is it a matter of there not being any decent dry filters available that will fit? (perhaps motorbike ones?)
While I understand that it the reason for having a aftermarket filter enclosed. In Queensland their is not legal way it has to be. The popo can say it is to prevent airbox fires, but the DOT don't mention anything about oils in the approved modifications paperwork. I really see no issues with socks + itbs in QLD.
Re: Intake Options
It was really at registration that I was asking (NSW). Not so much if you get pull over by the police.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3722
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:16 pm
- Vehicle: Non MX-5
- Location: Glasshouse Mountains, QLD
Re: Intake Options
It needs to be in an enclosed box if you are registered in NSW. For the 3rd time in this thread.Dupain wrote:It was really at registration that I was asking (NSW). Not so much if you get pull over by the police.
Re: Intake Options
sailaholic wrote:Did you consider search what everyone else is running rather then just asking? It's seen as a bit rude to ask really obvious questions that would have been answered lots of time with out searching first.
If it was more if a way to start your show and tell your probably better of starting a thread for your car in the garage section. That way everything is kept together for you.
Either way. It looks like a nice bit of kit.
My current (and far less then ideal intake )
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can't use one of the CX racing headers with how that cooling pipe over the headers. Is there any reason as to why you put the sock there? Firstly, it looks terrible - if you get pulled over the policeman would give you a defect because it is plain a sore on the eye rather than illegal. Thoughts of running a duct to under the wheel arch or front of the car? Also, is it legal to have exposed timing belts?
Last edited by Dupain on Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Intake Options
project.r.racing wrote:It needs to be in an enclosed box if you are registered in NSW. For the 3rd time in this thread.Dupain wrote:It was really at registration that I was asking (NSW). Not so much if you get pull over by the police.
Has anyone ever had a no when getting a pink slip. Would the mechanics know the laws? Don't they just check the brakes etc?
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3722
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:16 pm
- Vehicle: Non MX-5
- Location: Glasshouse Mountains, QLD
Re: Intake Options
Do what most people do. You swap the oem filter box for the aftermarket one when going for your slips. It's a 5 minute job before and after your check.Dupain wrote:project.r.racing wrote:It needs to be in an enclosed box if you are registered in NSW. For the 3rd time in this thread.Dupain wrote:It was really at registration that I was asking (NSW). Not so much if you get pull over by the police.
Has anyone ever had a no when getting a pink slip. Would the mechanics know the laws? Don't they just check the brakes etc?
Yes the mechs know the laws. Some will pass it, some will not. You can always ask you mech beforehand.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3511
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:38 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Intake Options
The only option would be a to make up a backing plate and top plate to sandwich a small paper filter between like an old school "ramflo" style. This would still have the disadvantage of filters on your velocity stacks in terms of flow so used it as a prompt to get back to looking at a (economical) remote filter airbox.
Project R I agree but i figure they are always going to pick on it so I'll see if I can take it away rather then argue and make them go looking elsewhere.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Project R I agree but i figure they are always going to pick on it so I'll see if I can take it away rather then argue and make them go looking elsewhere.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3722
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:16 pm
- Vehicle: Non MX-5
- Location: Glasshouse Mountains, QLD
Re: Intake Options
But by puting it inside the Mazdaspeed airbox, you have done what they want. Just pipe it to somewhere not hot. I mean thats the whole point of the removable window on the mazdaspped airbox, to gain access to the socks.sailaholic wrote:Project R I agree but i figure they are always going to pick on it so I'll see if I can take it away rather then argue and make them go looking elsewhere.
Cos what you have done is no real difference to have 4 socks on each throttle. I still see a exposed filter within the engine bay.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3511
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:38 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
Intake Options
I agree, the only advantage from this is the required flame path is much longer to cause ignition of the filter oil.
The point of the window is to access the velocity stacks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The point of the window is to access the velocity stacks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- zero00
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:54 pm
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Sunshine Coast Queensland
Re: Intake Options
Dupain wrote:project.r.racing wrote:It needs to be in an enclosed box if you are registered in NSW. For the 3rd time in this thread.Dupain wrote:It was really at registration that I was asking (NSW). Not so much if you get pull over by the police.
Has anyone ever had a no when getting a pink slip. Would the mechanics know the laws? Don't they just check the brakes etc?
Are you for real?
Roger D-SUNSHINE COAST
2000 NB8A-LP 69.1248|QR Clubman 71.9235|QR Sprint 68.1412
1989 NA6 B-SPEC #77|Toyota GTS86 MT
2000 NB8A-LP 69.1248|QR Clubman 71.9235|QR Sprint 68.1412
1989 NA6 B-SPEC #77|Toyota GTS86 MT
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:52 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Lugarno, Sydney
Re: Intake Options
Dupain wrote:project.r.racing wrote:It needs to be in an enclosed box if you are registered in NSW. For the 3rd time in this thread.Dupain wrote:It was really at registration that I was asking (NSW). Not so much if you get pull over by the police.
Has anyone ever had a no when getting a pink slip. Would the mechanics know the laws? Don't they just check the brakes etc?
They don't check anything, they just take your money and tell you that brakes are brakes and filters are filters. They probably won't even notice the pod as they are not familiar with your engine bay. Maybe you could teach them a thing or two when getting your pink slip, uno they are probably a bit old so I'm sure they'd appreciate your fresh ideas and lateral thinking. Give it a go and let us know!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NA6 turbo - 140kw atw - not the most powerful but so much fun
Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests