Strut Brace discussion

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

toppertee
Racing Driver
Posts: 699
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:16 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby toppertee » Mon May 19, 2014 8:33 pm

NitroDann wrote:What effect does a regular bolt on brace have on that?

What affect on performance does that have?

Dann


About the same as a stiffer sway bar?

User avatar
MattR
Racing Driver
Posts: 1305
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:26 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby MattR » Mon May 19, 2014 8:37 pm

Because the chassis is stiffer the suspension can work better in controlling and locating the wheels and also means that softer springs and damping can be used, giving greater control over the car and the reaction to bumps.

kazama
Fast Driver
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:35 pm
Vehicle: NB8A

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby kazama » Mon May 19, 2014 8:42 pm

i dont think theres any solid back to back laptime testing for different shock tower braces however 949 racing and flyin miata both run them. this is a quote from 949s emilio "If I remove the factory shock tower brace in my 99 sport package the turn in is a touch less precise and a I get a little more cowl shake.....
By mistake I raced without mine once and thought something was wrong with the car, felt like the front tires were 6 psi low. The whole session I narrowly missed apexes and had to drop entry speeds a skosh to get the car to rotate in time. Chased air pressure for a another session before noticing the STB languishing in the pit, laughing at me. I seem to be more sensitive to car setup than most drivers I know so maybe others wouldn't notice the difference."

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby gslender » Mon May 19, 2014 8:45 pm

NitroDann wrote:What effect does a regular bolt on brace have on that?

What affect on performance does that have?

Dann


Genuinely surprised you're taking that point of view.... You of all peeps should know that a stiffer chassis is better than one that isn't... Why else would chassis braces and frog arms exist if not?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

toppertee
Racing Driver
Posts: 699
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:16 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby toppertee » Mon May 19, 2014 8:46 pm

kazama wrote:i dont think theres any solid back to back laptime testing for different shock tower braces however 949 racing and flyin miata both run them. this is a quote from 949s emilio "If I remove the factory shock tower brace in my 99 sport package the turn in is a touch less precise and a I get a little more cowl shake.....
By mistake I raced without mine once and thought something was wrong with the car, felt like the front tires were 6 psi low. The whole session I narrowly missed apexes and had to drop entry speeds a skosh to get the car to rotate in time. Chased air pressure for a another session before noticing the STB languishing in the pit, laughing at me. I seem to be more sensitive to car setup than most drivers I know so maybe others wouldn't notice the difference."


is that the stock three point brace?

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby NitroDann » Mon May 19, 2014 9:14 pm

MattR wrote:Because the chassis is stiffer the suspension can work better in controlling and locating the wheels and also means that softer springs and damping can be used, giving greater control over the car and the reaction to bumps.


This is conjecture still. Nothing you are saying proves or even implies that anything that can be measured with a stopwatch will improve.


gslender wrote:
NitroDann wrote:What effect does a regular bolt on brace have on that?

What affect on performance does that have?

Dann


Genuinely surprised you're taking that point of view.... You of all peeps should know that a stiffer chassis is better than one that isn't... Why else would chassis braces and frog arms exist if not?


With full respect, products exist to profit from the sale of them.

Again, its a specific type of stiffness across specific points on the chassis that we are worried about, a regular strutbrace as seen on many forum members cars does not achieve this.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
MattR
Racing Driver
Posts: 1305
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:26 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby MattR » Mon May 19, 2014 9:21 pm

Umm yeah I did when I said I went quicker with strut brace than without a few posts up.

Because the chassis in my car is 25 years old and floppier than a rag doll any chassis stiffening will have a noticeable affect on the suspension performance and then times.

In a nc the effect of the strut brace will be a lot less noticeable as you are starting from a better base of a much stiffer chassis.

johnnyreble
Fast Driver
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:16 am
Vehicle: NA6 - Supercharged
Location: Perth WA

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby johnnyreble » Mon May 19, 2014 9:22 pm

When I fitted a tower brace my car felt stiffer immediately, with less body flex, but like fitting a racing seat it makes no difference to performance but makes a huge difference to how the driver feels whats going on and can take a couple of second off a lap, in my opinion it's a very cheap mod that makes a noticable difference.
Supercharged NA6

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby gslender » Mon May 19, 2014 9:25 pm

NitroDann wrote:
MattR wrote:Because the chassis is stiffer the suspension can work better in controlling and locating the wheels and also means that softer springs and damping can be used, giving greater control over the car and the reaction to bumps.


This is conjecture still. Nothing you are saying proves or even implies that anything that can be measured with a stopwatch will improve.


gslender wrote:
NitroDann wrote:What effect does a regular bolt on brace have on that?

What affect on performance does that have?

Dann


Genuinely surprised you're taking that point of view.... You of all peeps should know that a stiffer chassis is better than one that isn't... Why else would chassis braces and frog arms exist if not?


With full respect, products exist to profit from the sale of them.

Again, its a specific type of stiffness across specific points on the chassis that we are worried about, a regular strutbrace as seen on many forum members cars does not achieve this.

Dann


Based on what? Your opinion ? I can prove it has benefit by measuring how without it the towers come closer or further apart without it, and by that I can be certain the frame geometry is changing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

User avatar
MattR
Racing Driver
Posts: 1305
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:26 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby MattR » Mon May 19, 2014 9:32 pm

An interesting and entertaining discussion that I will be saying adieu to as I am off to Singapore and Bali for ten days.

I cannot wait to see how the discussion evolves and the fun banter between protagonists...... :)

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby NitroDann » Mon May 19, 2014 9:33 pm

Who cares about frame geometry, prove that it has non negligent effects on wheel geometry.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

johnnyreble
Fast Driver
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:16 am
Vehicle: NA6 - Supercharged
Location: Perth WA

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby johnnyreble » Mon May 19, 2014 9:40 pm

Well, Dann just knows EVERYTHING doesn't he .. !!!
Supercharged NA6

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby NitroDann » Mon May 19, 2014 9:57 pm

All I have done is ask for quantifiable proof of performance improvement.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby gslender » Mon May 19, 2014 10:01 pm

NitroDann wrote:All I have done is ask for quantifiable proof of performance improvement.

Dann


Are u seriously asking for proof that maintaining a stable chassis geometry is required and beneficial? If so, I'm gonna stop because you're just arguing for fun.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Strut Brace discussion

Postby NitroDann » Mon May 19, 2014 10:07 pm

I have asked for quantifiable proof of vehicle performance improvement by fitting a regular off the shelf bolt on strut tower brace to an NA/NB chassis mx5.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 367 guests