Hi,
The track NB I bought came with new eccentic superpro bushes. The lower arm rear bracket side plates don't have a great amount of material on the outside (see photo). However the front mounting covers the whole bush even with max. eccentricity. Camber is 2.8 neg
Does this allow unwanted movement / premature bush wear ?
Thanks & Cheers
Is this ok?
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata
-
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:38 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Newcastle
Is this ok?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Forum Guru
- Posts: 4897
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Moruya, NSW
Re: Is this ok?
That's fine. The bolt holds and locks a steel centre pin to the chassis. The lower control arm holds the poly bush very tightly (you could regard the poly bush and the lower control arm as almost being fused together). The bush assembly works by having the poly rotate (with the control arm) around the steel centre pin.
’95 NA8
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3722
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:16 pm
- Vehicle: Non MX-5
- Location: Glasshouse Mountains, QLD
Re: Is this ok?
just like the other 1000s of eccentic bushes out there. normal.
-
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:38 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Is this ok?
Ok, all good then
Thanks manga b & project r
Thanks manga b & project r
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:52 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Lugarno, Sydney
Re: Is this ok?
The bolt appears to be set for maximum negative camber (The mark points left in the pic)
Mine currently point upwards. If I change my settings as per this pic, will it reduce the gap in the wheel arch any?
Mine currently point upwards. If I change my settings as per this pic, will it reduce the gap in the wheel arch any?
NA6 turbo - 140kw atw - not the most powerful but so much fun
- hks_kansei
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6154
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Victoria
Re: Is this ok?
no
Camber is just how the wheel tilts, it has nothing to do with static height.
Camber is just how the wheel tilts, it has nothing to do with static height.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:09 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
Re: Is this ok?
speed wrote:The bolt appears to be set for maximum negative camber (The mark points left in the pic)
Mine currently point upwards. If I change my settings as per this pic, will it reduce the gap in the wheel arch any?
Yours is probably set for max caster then ..... Which is a good thing.
If you turn it around it may increase the gap in the front of the wheel arch (ie less castor)
-
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:38 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Is this ok?
wade wrote:speed wrote:The bolt appears to be set for maximum negative camber (The mark points left in the pic)
Mine currently point upwards. If I change my settings as per this pic, will it reduce the gap in the wheel arch any?
Yours is probably set for max caster then ..... Which is a good thing.
If you turn it around it may increase the gap in the front of the wheel arch (ie less castor)
No, max castor is achieved with the lower rear mount fully towards the outside (as per photo) plus the front mount fully towards the centre of the car. However, moving the front mount in, then reduces the camber - it's a compromise.
Cheers
Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 359 guests