greenMachine wrote:
If I am putting money into a race car (registered/road, or dedicated track car), I want to know where to spend my money to best effect/performance, and that when I have spent it I want to know that the performance I have bought will last me longer that the race meeting on xxx date, or even a season. Good ideas are all very well, but we (or at least I) need a certain level of stability and predictability.
Yep, we're on the same page here.
2F and 2B are good concepts, but do not account for new car development (eg. I still can't hope to compete with a well prepped and dríven Exige, or even an NC if I am driving an NA/NB).
Here is what I'm thinking:
Apply 2B / 2F rules.
Run supp regs as follows (example for 2F - might do something similar for 2B?):
2F Spec MX5 Class:
Only MX5s permitted in class
Minimum car and driver weight for NA6 at end of race, 1050kg
NA8 1100kg (or so? May need more/less for parity)
NB8A/C 1120kg or so
NB8B 1140kg or so
NC - not sure but would probably require significant ballast... Spec Miata does not allow NC yet I think.
Tyres - controlled semi slicks - say Star Specs or Advans?
Wheels - limited to 17x7.
No non-standard bodywork / aero permitted.
Any NA/NB gearbox or diff ratio offered by the factory permitted for use in any NA/NB car.
Not sure if intake restrictors would be necessary for the bigger engines, it may be that ballast could bring parity but that may require some testing, or just borrow the Spec Miata rules as a starting point (though their engine/intake mods are somewhat different to 2F).
I could swallow this... And I think most existing race cars out there could fairly easily meet these criteria? Would make for close racing!
If guys want to build something bigger/faster, they can go run prodsports or something... And I wouldn't care if we were on the track with other classes/cars, as long as I was racing guys in similar machinery.