Brave new motoring?

MX5 Car Clubs of Australia

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Brave new motoring?

Postby NitroDann » Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:37 pm

Pilots and bus drivers have the black boxes just like coles has a manager, because people are being paid agree to have a supervisor as part of their contract.

If they dont like it they can go to a position that doesnt have one or start their own business.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Re: Brave new motoring?

Postby JBT » Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:41 pm

Pilots fly aircraft that have "black boxes" (FDR and CVR) to record data to tell the service crews what it has done prior to service or to tell investigators what went wrong if it goes wrong and only when it goes wrong. The "black boxes" do not supervise or manage the pilots, the aircraft or its operation but can be used during operation to help the crews assess a problem.
Image

rjastra2
Racing Driver
Posts: 1435
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 10:15 pm

Re: Brave new motoring?

Postby rjastra2 » Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:56 pm

JBT wrote:Pilots fly aircraft that have "black boxes" (FDR and CVR) to record data to tell the service crews what it has done prior to service or to tell investigators what went wrong if it goes wrong and only when it goes wrong.


And that's exactly what any black box info stored in a vehicle would be used for.

Do you think that the notion that a pilot's voice and actions are being monitored and could be reported on when an accident occurs may moderate their behaviour?

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Re: Brave new motoring?

Postby JBT » Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:38 pm

rjastra2 wrote:Do you think that the notion that a pilot's voice and actions are being monitored and could be reported on when an accident occurs may moderate their behaviour?

No. They do what they do as professionals and because they rarely walk away from accidents. In multi-crew situations, the crew help prevent human errors. However, mechanical problems. poor training. poor skills. procedural errors and/or cultural issues can still lead to an accident or incident.
Image

User avatar
StuwieP
Fast Driver
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:54 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Melbourne

Re: Brave new motoring?

Postby StuwieP » Thu Sep 19, 2013 12:57 pm

OurCognitiveSurplus wrote:I don't think people are dumb. I think a person is actually pretty smart.

That's two separate things, in my mind, which you cover below

People are dumb if you treat them like they're dumb. Flocks of people can be pretty dumb.

But I think a sophisticated policy which treats people as not-dumb (e.g. please drive to the conditions of the day) is not going to fail because 'people are dumb'.

We know that it works in Germany. Are Germans smarter than Australians? Maybe there's experiance and practice and culture - but I don't think they're smarter.


I think this is spot on. Problem is, the government generally treats people as though they are stupid. In catering for, perhaps, the lowest common denominator, the rules and regulations encourage a culture, as you point out, of poor personal responsibility.

I think if we introduce drastic 'driver monitoring' programs we just encourage further laxity in terms of behaviour, just expecting the government to look after all the problems.
My NA6/SE build
Engine #1 RIP 04/07/2020

User avatar
Rocky
Concerned Citizen.
Posts: 6178
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 4:42 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Queensland

Re: Brave new motoring?

Postby Rocky » Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:44 pm

The difficulty in trying to compare what happens in different countries is that you are talking about different cultures.
Culturally, Germany (and Japan for e.g.) is very different from Australia.
Japan is a better example to use -
Japanese are (in general) more compliant to authority. Look at the clean street - nobody litters. Have a look at Australia - feral.
Australia is very much an "Individualist" culture whilst others are more "Collectivist".
I doubt you could ever train Australians to have much regard for the 'greater wellbeing of society'.
We are too far down the road of 'do what you like and to hell with everybody else'.
Appealing to a 'sense of social responsibility' doesn't work very well with intensely 'individualistic' cultures. You need to start brainwashing people at birth to achieve innate compliance.
Image
Foundation Member: Grumpy Old Bastards Club.


Return to “MX5 General Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests