Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata
-
- Learner Driver
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:19 pm
Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
Hey guys,
A few months ago, my partner had an accident in my mx5 when driving it to meet a friend. The accident was in the front right just in front of the driver. I wasn't there for the accident, but the impact was hard enough to damage the front axel, so it took a few weeks (6) to wate for the appropriate part to come in.
Anyway, I was away overseas working when the car was picked up. The day after I came home and was picked up from the airport in the car, i found the car battery was dead because the boot hadn't closed yet and the light stayed on overnight. The boot now doesn't close properly, the right side is slightly raised over the left side, and I have to close it harder than normal to get it to latch shut.
The mechanic who did the job is quite far away so I called him up first. He fold me that since the accident was in the fornt of the car, he never touched the boot panels during the repair, so it has nothing to do with him. I use the boot regularly transporting small bits and pieces around for work and it has always been fine until now.
My concern is this. Could the accident have actually damaged the frame back to the boot to cause this, and more importantly, how would I work out if this was the case? Obviously in such a case, the car should be deemed a write off by the insurance company and not a repair job.
A few months ago, my partner had an accident in my mx5 when driving it to meet a friend. The accident was in the front right just in front of the driver. I wasn't there for the accident, but the impact was hard enough to damage the front axel, so it took a few weeks (6) to wate for the appropriate part to come in.
Anyway, I was away overseas working when the car was picked up. The day after I came home and was picked up from the airport in the car, i found the car battery was dead because the boot hadn't closed yet and the light stayed on overnight. The boot now doesn't close properly, the right side is slightly raised over the left side, and I have to close it harder than normal to get it to latch shut.
The mechanic who did the job is quite far away so I called him up first. He fold me that since the accident was in the fornt of the car, he never touched the boot panels during the repair, so it has nothing to do with him. I use the boot regularly transporting small bits and pieces around for work and it has always been fine until now.
My concern is this. Could the accident have actually damaged the frame back to the boot to cause this, and more importantly, how would I work out if this was the case? Obviously in such a case, the car should be deemed a write off by the insurance company and not a repair job.
- TieNN89
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:27 pm
- Vehicle: NC
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
I doubt it would of done anything to the boot
If it did then the car would be pretty messed up IMO
Someone didn't put something big in the boot then slammed it shut? Because that would be one reason why the right side is sitting higher than the left side
If it did then the car would be pretty messed up IMO
Someone didn't put something big in the boot then slammed it shut? Because that would be one reason why the right side is sitting higher than the left side
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:04 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: North West, NSW
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
Complain to the insurance company.
I sent my old Carnival in for repair once after being rear ended. When I got the car back, the right rear door handle was broken, the passenger seat was reclined and there were splatter stains from coffee or coke...I figured that the repairers were taking their breaks in my car.
Credit to AAMI for sorting it out for me.
I sent my old Carnival in for repair once after being rear ended. When I got the car back, the right rear door handle was broken, the passenger seat was reclined and there were splatter stains from coffee or coke...I figured that the repairers were taking their breaks in my car.
Credit to AAMI for sorting it out for me.
-
- Learner Driver
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:19 pm
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
TieNN89 wrote:Someone didn't put something big in the boot then slammed it shut? Because that would be one reason why the right side is sitting higher than the left side
That must be a possibility, but I'm the only one who uses the boot, and nothing big has been in it like that.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 11856
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
- Vehicle: Clubman
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
Apu wrote:Complain to the insurance company.
^+1
If no satisfaction, then complain to the insurance ombudsman.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6444
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
There will be no connection between the accident and the boot not closing properly. If the 2 things were connected then the repairer would have identified what needed to be repaired and you should have been involved in the process. If the insurer checked the car or for that matter accepted the report on damage and costs then it was already considered repairable and not a write off. Also you would have received a warranty for the work that was done ie to the axle and to the front rhs of the vehicle. One cannot make a claim on an insurer for damages which were not related to a specific event ie other panels may be scratched or damaged from other incidents where no claim was ever made or which were pre existing. By all means talk to the insurance co and you will get their response to it.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 11856
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
- Vehicle: Clubman
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
Mr Morlock wrote:There will be no connection between the accident and the boot not closing properly. If the 2 things were connected then the repairer would have identified what needed to be repaired and you should have been involved in the process.
Very twee Morlock - you probably still believe in Father Christmas & the Tooth Fairy. Your faith in some people is very touching.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:04 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: North West, NSW
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
Right Morlock...just like there was no connection between being rear ended and the broken door handle and Coke/coffee stains in my car.
The AAMI assessor tried to explain that my wife could have broken the door handle and my kids could have spilt the coke. Problem is that my wife doesn't let the kids out on the right side of the car (so doesn't use that door handle AND it wasn't noted as broken when I dropped the car off), and my kids (at the time) were too young to drink Coke...plus I did not recline the seats when I removed the kids seats.
sh*t happens in these workshops, and the insurance company / repairer should be held accountable for additional damage when the car is in their possession.
The AAMI assessor tried to explain that my wife could have broken the door handle and my kids could have spilt the coke. Problem is that my wife doesn't let the kids out on the right side of the car (so doesn't use that door handle AND it wasn't noted as broken when I dropped the car off), and my kids (at the time) were too young to drink Coke...plus I did not recline the seats when I removed the kids seats.
sh*t happens in these workshops, and the insurance company / repairer should be held accountable for additional damage when the car is in their possession.
- PT
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1188
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 7:11 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
Mr Morlock wrote:There will be no connection between the accident and the boot not closing properly. If the 2 things were connected then the repairer would have identified what needed to be repaired and you should have been involved in the process. If the insurer checked the car or for that matter accepted the report on damage and costs then it was already considered repairable and not a write off. Also you would have received a warranty for the work that was done ie to the axle and to the front rhs of the vehicle. One cannot make a claim on an insurer for damages which were not related to a specific event ie other panels may be scratched or damaged from other incidents where no claim was ever made or which were pre existing. By all means talk to the insurance co and you will get their response to it.
It is fairly common practice in many body shops I have been to that parts for the particular car are stored in the boot. For example in this case they may have removed the headlights and fog lights and other items and stored them in the boot of the car. They could have damaged them in the process. Don't be so dismissive.
2001 Mazda MX-5 NB8B- http://www.mx5cartalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=61506
Past:
2005 Mazda MX-5 SE
1991 Mazda MX-5 NA6
Past:
2005 Mazda MX-5 SE
1991 Mazda MX-5 NA6
- TieNN89
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:27 pm
- Vehicle: NC
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
PT wrote:It is fairly common practice in many body shops I have been to that parts for the particular car are stored in the boot. For example in this case they may have removed the headlights and fog lights and other items and stored them in the boot of the car. They could have damaged them in the process. Don't be so dismissive.
Very true I didn't even think of this
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6444
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
"Very twee Morlock - you probably still believe in Father Christmas & the Tooth Fairy. Your faith in some people is very touching". Loved that -I did hear a rumour about both of these characters but we all know they are alive and well.
and Apu "Right Morlock...just like there was no connection between being rear ended and the broken door handle and Coke/coffee stains in my car". Your are right cars sitting in workshops or anywhere can be damaged - thats stating the bloody obvious.
and PT "It is fairly common practice in many body shops I have been to that parts for the particular car are stored in the boot".Well anything is possible - a long shot but how do you prove that it was not a pre existing condition etc.Boots get things placed in them all the time without a problem- thats what boots are for.
You get a quote you check the car and you inspect it before you take it away and you get a warranty on the work. I still say quite clearly that the boot is not likely to be any part of the front damage and if it was then the owner / the repairer and presumably assessor would have picked it up.
Its a process- if the owner has a problem it goes to the Insurer etc.
and Apu "Right Morlock...just like there was no connection between being rear ended and the broken door handle and Coke/coffee stains in my car". Your are right cars sitting in workshops or anywhere can be damaged - thats stating the bloody obvious.
and PT "It is fairly common practice in many body shops I have been to that parts for the particular car are stored in the boot".Well anything is possible - a long shot but how do you prove that it was not a pre existing condition etc.Boots get things placed in them all the time without a problem- thats what boots are for.
You get a quote you check the car and you inspect it before you take it away and you get a warranty on the work. I still say quite clearly that the boot is not likely to be any part of the front damage and if it was then the owner / the repairer and presumably assessor would have picked it up.
Its a process- if the owner has a problem it goes to the Insurer etc.
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:04 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: North West, NSW
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
Mr Morlock wrote:"and Apu "Right Morlock...just like there was no connection between being rear ended and the broken door handle and Coke/coffee stains in my car". Your are right cars sitting in workshops or anywhere can be damaged - thats stating the bloody obvious.
But Morlock...that's what you do so well!
- slimx
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 1:12 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B - Turbo
- Location: Sydney (Sth West)
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
Ombudsman is the way to go, i had a car that just needed a new front bumper and headlights, when i got the car back, the rear wheels were actually "to the right" (Right side sticking out, and left side in). I took it up with the ombudsman and the repairer (AAMI - worst insurance company in terms of quality btw). and it was all repaired free of charge, of course i did have to put up with the panel beater being a flop and nagging about it. - But he did a good (almost great) job. Even made him remove dings haha.
- Old Dude
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:06 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Gold Coast
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
someone ran up the back of my son's Mazda 3, took it the insurance companies repairer and from the outside it looked good underneath was covered in overspray where they hadn't been bothered to cover the suspension components , after complaining, the repairer repaired this issue but made other issue's and we found others(reversing sensors in the wrong place, etc)
In the end I rang the insurance company and asked them to assess the repair which they happily did, and found more issues which they made the repairer fix and then re assessed it once it was completed, this continued until the insurance company was totally happy with the job and it was a lot easier having the insurance jump down the repairers throat than me
Cheers
Dale
In the end I rang the insurance company and asked them to assess the repair which they happily did, and found more issues which they made the repairer fix and then re assessed it once it was completed, this continued until the insurance company was totally happy with the job and it was a lot easier having the insurance jump down the repairers throat than me
Cheers
Dale
"Everybody dies......, but not everybody lives" ;-)
MX 5 2001 Grace Green
NB8B
MX 5 2001 Grace Green
NB8B
- slimx
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 1:12 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B - Turbo
- Location: Sydney (Sth West)
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy insurance or Something Less Sinister?
I assume that's NRMA? They're the only company that actually CARES
Return to “MX5 Body, Paint, Interior & Trim”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests