clutch &/or gearbox replacement on NA

MavMX5 · Postby **MavMX5** » Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:11 pm

Not sure if this is the right section to post, but ... what should it cost to replace the:

1) clutch; and/or

2) gearbox

on an original first gen NA.

Any recommendations for a good place to get this done well and cost effectively in Melbourne?

Thanks

vrmmmpshhh · Postby **vrmmmpshhh** » Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:25 pm

used gearboxes are around $350, extreme heavy duty clutch is $350ish, machining flywheel is 50, labour is anywhere between 350-600

93_Clubman · Postby **93_Clubman** » Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:37 pm

See last post here for recent experience:
viewtopic.php?f=29&t=54581

Mr Morlock · Postby **Mr Morlock** » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:02 pm

a clutch- standard product with labour you will not get much change from $800. The easy way - is ask for a quote. Insofar as places to get it done in Melb- there are plenty that can do this work and where you live is a key factor. Standard answer is get it done somewhere convenient.

MavMX5 · Postby **MavMX5** » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:55 pm

Thanks for your comments.

@vrmmmpshhh - did the $350-600 guesstimate mean approx $350 (labour) for the clutch and $600 for both clutch & gearbox?

@Mr Morlock - I'd imagine some places might be better than others for this job. If I was to nominate a suburb, it would be Hawthorn but surrounding areas are fine too. The best would be a place that's experienced in this kind of job and will do it very well for the fairest/lowest price. Any recommendations? Thanks

vrmmmpshhh · Postby **vrmmmpshhh** » Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:14 pm

350-600 is just the labour.

MavMX5 · Postby **MavMX5** » Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:35 pm

just to clarify, I was asking, "did the $350-600 guesstimate mean approx $350 (labour) for the clutch and $600 (labour) for both clutch & gearbox? ... or did it mean that "$350-600" is the range you'd expect for labour on just the clutch.

vrmmmpshhh · Postby **vrmmmpshhh** » Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:40 pm

its just the range you'd expect to pay. you'd be pretty dumbass to change a gearbox without doing the clutch unless it was already new. with the gearbox off, the clutch is a piss easy job so labour for doing both should be the same.

MavMX5 · Postby **MavMX5** » Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:01 pm

yes but the options are ONLY the clutch -or- BOTH the clutch & gearbox. That's why they were split, ie. I was seeking cost indications for just the clutch and for both.

vrmmmpshhh · Postby **vrmmmpshhh** » Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:33 pm

cost for labour is the same whether you do the clutch or clutch/gearbox.

Eunos Roadster · Postby **Eunos Roadster** » Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:15 pm

Hi Mav,

Not quite sure if this is relevant, but why are you tossing up between just clutch or clutch and gearbox? You either need a new/better box or you don't?
As mentioned before, if you have the box out you'll be a fool not to do the clutch. If it wasn't a daily driver Iwould give it a crack myself. Once I have me workshop set up I would gladly lend a hand.

MavMX5 · Postby **MavMX5** » Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:25 pm

I'm not tossing up between the 2, it's whether both are required. If the gearbox is required & the clutch is gone, then yes, you'd do both at the same time ... BUT if the gearbox is fine, you only need do the clutch.

Eunos Roadster · Postby **Eunos Roadster** » Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:21 am

MavMX5 wrote:I'm not tossing up between the 2, it's whether both are required. If the gearbox is required & the clutch is gone, then yes, you'd do both at the same time ... BUT if the gearbox is fine, you only need do the clutch.

I still dont get it? Why would you consider chucking out a working gearbox when the clutch is gone?
Of course you would only change the clutch.
If you are talking labour cost, my guess is there isnt much of a saving if you just do the clutch as the work involved is similar and it would come down to maybe and extra 30 min to change the gerabox while your in there....

vrmmmpshhh · Postby **vrmmmpshhh** » Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:58 am

changing a gearbox only or changing a clutch only is pretty much the exact same job.

MavMX5 · Postby **MavMX5** » Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:26 pm

Eunos Roadster wrote:
MavMX5 wrote:I'm not tossing up between the 2, it's whether both are required. If the gearbox is required & the clutch is gone, then yes, you'd do both at the same time ... BUT if the gearbox is fine, you only need do the clutch.

I still dont get it?

I'm not sure what's not being got.

Eunos Roadster wrote:Why would you consider chucking out a working gearbox when the clutch is gone? .

I don't know where you're getting the idea someone would consider such a thing.

Eunos Roadster wrote:Of course you would only change the clutch.

Absolutely. That's what it says above "if the gearbox is fine, you only need do the clutch."

Eunos Roadster wrote:If you are talking labour cost, my guess is there isnt much of a saving if you just do the clutch as the work involved is similar and it would come down to maybe and extra 30 min to change the gerabox while your in there....

yes, ditto, that's the view expressed above.
I can only guess that the misunderstanding might be premised on you thinking that the original question was about saving money or only about labour when it was actually just a straight question. ie. what is the cost of replacing the clutch or both (not knowing whether either or both are gone) ... and that Q was pretty much already answered by 11/10.