After a few days of driving around on the IL bushes i'm happy i went with them.
NVH increase is pretty small in my opinion.
But there has been a big improvement in all other areas over the 200000km old OE bushes.
Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (or si
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata
-
- Driver
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:03 pm
- StanTheMan
- Forum legend
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Balgowlah
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
Patchy has the Poly urathane ones. They are far too stiff for a road car. I also have the offset ones. don't bother. Certainly not on a road car.
Although I really CBF these days. If I had to change it again, Id go OEM.
Its al very subjective. When I changed them Patchy had done just over 200 k km. It went from sooper loose to sooper stiff. If you want a good handling car on the road. I'd steer away from them.
Although I really CBF these days. If I had to change it again, Id go OEM.
Its al very subjective. When I changed them Patchy had done just over 200 k km. It went from sooper loose to sooper stiff. If you want a good handling car on the road. I'd steer away from them.
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3511
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:38 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
Which ones brand wise?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
- StanTheMan
- Forum legend
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Balgowlah
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
sailaholic wrote:Which ones brand wise?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
mine?
Mine are Super Pro at the time of installation (2007) they were the ducks guts..
LOL there was a group-buy here on the forum. I cant recall who originally organized it but it did go through MX5 mania. I think they did 25 sets.
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3511
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:38 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
Bummer, hope my email experience is better with them then.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
- PhilM
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:55 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
EDIT on my previous post - the Poly bushes I tried and found too hard were Energy Suspension not Superpro - apologies
Rosso Corsa Red NA V Special
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3511
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:38 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
Good to hear, energy suspension are known to be much stiffer.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
- wozzah1975
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:39 pm
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
The biggest problem any suspension bush is the relationship between the rigidity/design of the bush and where people use it in a particular suspension set up.
A great deal of thought needs to go into how the particular bush you are replacing needs to function and move.
For example, a traditional 4 link set up with a lateral link.
http://nolathane.com.au/susp_ident_images/10.jpg
On a set up like this the bushes in the upper and lower trailing arms need to
-control the differential castor angle and twist under load
-be able to twist to allow the body to "roll" left to right
Fitting hard bushes in these set ups whilst excellent for controlling the castor angle completely ruins the twist required for the rolling motion, as the bush binds under this load and doesn't allow the suspension to act the way it was designed to. It turns a neutrally balanced car into an oversteering pig.
The flip side is the rubber style bushes with a moulded in centre pin are also not ideal. When the suspension travels up and down the rubber bush binds between the moulded pin and outer shell, however the rubber compound is generally more flexible for the body roll motion. What is required is a well designed bush that has a pivoting centre pin, rigid castor control, but flexible twisting control, so a great deal of thought needs to go into what you fit.
On the lateral control (the watts link in the example above) however we need the bush to only pivot up and down with no twisting required, and the items also need to keep the differential as central as possible, so a hard bush with good pivoting properties would be required there.
The bottom line is when you buy bushes look at your suspension set up, and how the item you are replacing needs to move and pick a bush design and material to suit.
IMO.
Hard urathane style bushes are excellent when used for
-Sway bar "D" bushes
-Areas where pivoting only is required (providing the centre pin rotates nicely and not to firmly)
eg:
http://nolathane.com.au/susp_ident_images/22.jpg
Softer style urathane and rubber style bushes are better for
-areas of the suspension that need to retain twisting forces (the 4 link listed above is a good example)
-areas where bush movement and flexability is required
Something to also take into consideration is road noise, as firm bushes will amplify road noise and harshness through the car.
Cheers
Woz
A great deal of thought needs to go into how the particular bush you are replacing needs to function and move.
For example, a traditional 4 link set up with a lateral link.
http://nolathane.com.au/susp_ident_images/10.jpg
On a set up like this the bushes in the upper and lower trailing arms need to
-control the differential castor angle and twist under load
-be able to twist to allow the body to "roll" left to right
Fitting hard bushes in these set ups whilst excellent for controlling the castor angle completely ruins the twist required for the rolling motion, as the bush binds under this load and doesn't allow the suspension to act the way it was designed to. It turns a neutrally balanced car into an oversteering pig.
The flip side is the rubber style bushes with a moulded in centre pin are also not ideal. When the suspension travels up and down the rubber bush binds between the moulded pin and outer shell, however the rubber compound is generally more flexible for the body roll motion. What is required is a well designed bush that has a pivoting centre pin, rigid castor control, but flexible twisting control, so a great deal of thought needs to go into what you fit.
On the lateral control (the watts link in the example above) however we need the bush to only pivot up and down with no twisting required, and the items also need to keep the differential as central as possible, so a hard bush with good pivoting properties would be required there.
The bottom line is when you buy bushes look at your suspension set up, and how the item you are replacing needs to move and pick a bush design and material to suit.
IMO.
Hard urathane style bushes are excellent when used for
-Sway bar "D" bushes
-Areas where pivoting only is required (providing the centre pin rotates nicely and not to firmly)
eg:
http://nolathane.com.au/susp_ident_images/22.jpg
Softer style urathane and rubber style bushes are better for
-areas of the suspension that need to retain twisting forces (the 4 link listed above is a good example)
-areas where bush movement and flexability is required
Something to also take into consideration is road noise, as firm bushes will amplify road noise and harshness through the car.
Cheers
Woz
BP DOHC Mk1 Escort race car. Big Valve head, Cosworth Cams, Spool Rods, Nissan Pistons
www.facebook.com/pages/Warren-Heath-Per ... 4779879292
www.facebook.com/pages/Warren-Heath-Per ... 4779879292
- PhilM
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:55 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Lake Macquarie
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
The rear lower wishbones on the NA & NB( not sure about the NC) front and rear bushes have separate part numbers because the rubber has different hardness - front one softer. This is designed to give a steering effect to the suspension when a side force is applied. That's why they hang on in a corner better than you expect compared to other cars you have dríven and puts the smile on your face!
The OEM bushes are designed with a "crush" centre bush and the OD is extremely a tight deflection fit in the wish bone. This gives the bush torsional resistance - they have to be tightened when the load is on the wheels. The bush is part of the designed spring rate.
The OEM bushes are designed with a "crush" centre bush and the OD is extremely a tight deflection fit in the wish bone. This gives the bush torsional resistance - they have to be tightened when the load is on the wheels. The bush is part of the designed spring rate.
Rosso Corsa Red NA V Special
- Pamex
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:28 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: SE Melb
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
I went to poly (Energy Suspension) a while back. They're ok, no noticeable difference though. I just needed to replace some bushes so went with them.
Currently, I'm doing a full strip-down rebuild of my MX5, and as I have everything out (crossmember etc.) I'll be going back to rubber bushes. The thought of re-greasing them in a few years isn't attractive. I don't want to have to take the car apart again anytime soon. Everything is apart, so I might as well do it all now.
Wozzah is correct though, you have to use poly for the correct application and you need to install them correctly.
Currently, I'm doing a full strip-down rebuild of my MX5, and as I have everything out (crossmember etc.) I'll be going back to rubber bushes. The thought of re-greasing them in a few years isn't attractive. I don't want to have to take the car apart again anytime soon. Everything is apart, so I might as well do it all now.
Wozzah is correct though, you have to use poly for the correct application and you need to install them correctly.
Red 1990 NA | 1949 MG TC. TC 6568 | 244GL Rally Volvo | 1979 HZ Kingswood
"If you can't undestand from wiki, I can't help you." - A wise man
"If you can't undestand from wiki, I can't help you." - A wise man
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:04 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: Has anyone gone from new rubber bushes to poly bushes (o
well the jury is out on poly V Rubber and it is a tuff decision to choose what is the correct bush for this type of car that has many applications. My NB8A had 200K Klm and is not a DD and mainly Track in qld and on its old frozen rubbers and needed a change ( rear drivers side was frozen 40mm lower than passengers)
after a bit off budget consideration, i have purchased and just installed a set of black prothane Poly bushes, i used a synthetic grease from castrol and coated the external of the bush in the sticky stuff and coaled the inner bushes with lots of LCL castrol grease,
The job took two days including painting the wishbones. I didnt quite get the wheel alignment i wanted caster max at 4.5 and camber a -1, it may take some time to settle in Toe in was Ok
Immediate feel is better response and lighter steering, NVH is significant and it feels like the teins are actually now.
i struggled with deciding to install Zerk fiitings as per FM recommendations and decided not too as if im not happy ill go back to rubber
Ill update after next lakeside in July as per the feel and results
after a bit off budget consideration, i have purchased and just installed a set of black prothane Poly bushes, i used a synthetic grease from castrol and coated the external of the bush in the sticky stuff and coaled the inner bushes with lots of LCL castrol grease,
The job took two days including painting the wishbones. I didnt quite get the wheel alignment i wanted caster max at 4.5 and camber a -1, it may take some time to settle in Toe in was Ok
Immediate feel is better response and lighter steering, NVH is significant and it feels like the teins are actually now.
i struggled with deciding to install Zerk fiitings as per FM recommendations and decided not too as if im not happy ill go back to rubber
Ill update after next lakeside in July as per the feel and results
98 NB8A Grace Green
LS 66.17,QR Club 69.27, QRSpr 63.58 SOLD
01 NB8B Grace Green
LS 64.66,QRNat 1.31.94,QR Club 65.17 QRSpr 62.36
93 NA8 Clubman
LS 66.17,QR Club 69.27, QRSpr 63.58 SOLD
01 NB8B Grace Green
LS 64.66,QRNat 1.31.94,QR Club 65.17 QRSpr 62.36
93 NA8 Clubman
Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 357 guests