How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

User avatar
lee
Racing Driver
Posts: 597
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:28 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Me!bourne

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby lee » Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:43 pm

Patrick Bramston wrote:185/60/14 weighs 7.9 kilo's..205/50/15 weghs 9.7 kilo's...All in the BOOK..

Different tyres have different weights. A Bridgestone 205/50R15 might not weight the same as a Dunlop 205/50R15. Despite the complete incomparability of the two sets of wheels I own, I'll weigh them now to see how different they are.
'91 Roadster

User avatar
Guran
Speed Racer
Posts: 3754
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:42 pm
Vehicle: ND - 1.5
Location: Albion Park NSW
Contact:

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby Guran » Thu Aug 30, 2012 5:01 pm

Patrick Bramston wrote:Put 225 wide tyres on 9 inch rims on Gurans car and he will be slower because they weigh SO much more.. Unsprung weight is SO important.. Those daisy wheels only weigh 5.5 kilos....

Next club trackday at Wakefield Park, I'll see if I can convince Keith or Glenn to let me try my car with their stock 205/45R16 Star Specs.

stock daisies 5.5kg + Star Spec 185/60R14 8.2kg = 13.7kg each
stock 16" x 6.5" 7.0kg + Star Spec 205/50R16 10.0kg = 17.0kg each
(couldn't find weights for 205/45R16 but I estimate about 9.0kg)

So an extra 3kg per corner in unsprung mass and the smaller longitudinal contact patch (less braking grip?), needs to be offset by the (hopefully) improved lateral grip in corners. Interesting experiment. 8)
Standard 2006 NC - YouTube
WP 1:11.89 | SMP-S 1:05.90 GP 1:54.93 N 1:18.09 L 2:22.49 | PW 1:02.52
PI 2:00.55 | W-S 1:12.44 W-L 1:43.36 | SR 1:33.25

Patrick Bramston
Fast Driver
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby Patrick Bramston » Thu Aug 30, 2012 5:53 pm

Bryan.. maybe they could run your wheels and tyres for one session as well..It will be interesting to see if you are slower and they are quicker or if the times are similar...

User avatar
A.Chen89
Racing Driver
Posts: 509
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:09 pm
Vehicle: NB8B - Turbo
Location: Western Sydney

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby A.Chen89 » Thu Aug 30, 2012 6:08 pm

I think people in this topic will find Carroll Smith books interesting.

Muzdaman
Fast Driver
Posts: 453
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:00 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby Muzdaman » Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:31 pm

Guran wrote:
Patrick Bramston wrote:Put 225 wide tyres on 9 inch rims on Gurans car and he will be slower because they weigh SO much more.. Unsprung weight is SO important.. Those daisy wheels only weigh 5.5 kilos....

Next club trackday at Wakefield Park, I'll see if I can convince Keith or Glenn to let me try my car with their stock 205/45R16 Star Specs.

stock daisies 5.5kg + Star Spec 185/60R14 8.2kg = 13.7kg each
stock 16" x 6.5" 7.0kg + Star Spec 205/50R16 10.0kg = 17.0kg each
(couldn't find weights for 205/45R16 but I estimate about 9.0kg)

So an extra 3kg per corner in unsprung mass and the smaller longitudinal contact patch (less braking grip?), needs to be offset by the (hopefully) improved lateral grip in corners. Interesting experiment. 8)


It would also be good to see a much wider wheel comparison
15x8 6uls 5.7 kg + 205/50R15 Starspecs 9.5kg = 15.2 kgs

If what Emilio states is true the small weight increase would easily be offset by increased grip.

as_1
Learner Driver
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:43 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby as_1 » Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:12 pm

So, how would the car be affected if wheels were to be changed to lower offset, while keeping other factors the same i.e. changing the wheel from 17*7 et55 to 17*7 et35 for an NC, using the same tyres?

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby NitroDann » Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:44 pm

It would be uunquestionably worse.

Period.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
Dan
Racing Driver
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:27 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby Dan » Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:13 pm

NitroDann wrote:It would be uunquestionably worse.

Period.

Dann

Does that only apply to a car with the stock suspension?

I'm not saying you're wrong I'm just interested in knowing why since I thought widening the track would be a good thing.
2009 NC2 - Ohlins (7kg/5kg), Whiteline Sways, Weds TC105N (17x8), OEM Hardtop & 2009 987.2 Boxster

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby NitroDann » Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:22 pm

It applies with stock geometry, so yeah anything but welding on new pickup and custom arms it will be worse.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
lightyear
Infinity & Beyond
Posts: 2331
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:54 pm
Vehicle: NA6 - Turbo
Location: s.e. melbourne

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby lightyear » Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:07 am

I did a 1:38.00 at winton on the weekend with the 9" rims and 225's. That's about one million four hundred and tweny five seconds faster than anyone has gone on 7" and 195's.
NA8B - P.I 1:50.1 Wntn1:38.0 Sand1:27.6 Wntn S1:08 Bfrd1:06.9 Cldr1:08.5 Wak1:10.4
"SE" - P.I 1:43.8 Wntn1:32.9 Sand1:22.0 Bfrd1:05.3

rascal
Racing Driver
Posts: 1770
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:39 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: FarSE Melbourne

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby rascal » Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:03 am

as_1 wrote:So, how would the car be affected if wheels were to be changed to lower offset, while keeping other factors the same i.e. changing the wheel from 17*7 et55 to 17*7 et35 for an NC, using the same tyres?

NitroDann wrote:It would be uunquestionably worse.

Dann

Define worse.. and in context of desired outcome.

If you are tracking your car and fit the lower offset rims, then the mid corner grip will be improved NOT made worse..
Widening the track reduces the load transfer onto the outside wheel, improving cornering ability.

If you are talking scrub radius, feel, kickback, then that would get worse.

But depends entirely what your reqs are..

Personally I run wider offset rims on my track car and it helps my times. For me the positives outweigh the negatives..

as_1
Learner Driver
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:43 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby as_1 » Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:35 pm

I always thought wider track will be a good thing as well

So what are the pros and cons?
What else would you need to do to make it all work with the lower offset?

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby NitroDann » Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:04 pm

lightyear wrote:I did a 1:38.00 at winton on the weekend with the 9" rims and 225's. That's about one million four hundred and tweny five seconds faster than anyone has gone on 7" and 195's.


ROFL.


:lol:

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

hb
Driver
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 1:11 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: newcastle

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby hb » Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:37 pm

lee wrote:
Patrick Bramston wrote:185/60/14 weighs 7.9 kilo's..205/50/15 weghs 9.7 kilo's...All in the BOOK..

Different tyres have different weights. A Bridgestone 205/50R15 might not weight the same as a Dunlop 205/50R15. Despite the complete incomparability of the two sets of wheels I own, I'll weigh them now to see how different they are.
Patrick Bramston wrote:185/60/14 weighs 7.9 kilo's..205/50/15 weghs 9.7 kilo's...All in the BOOK..


heres a little comparison. using dunlop star specs for all of them

185/60 r14
weight: 8.16

195/50 r15
weight: 8.16

205/50 r15
weight: 9.98

id love a set of 185s on rp-f1s but the tyre choice is far too limited. 195s are tossable enough for me
ginger bread man

User avatar
username
Fast Driver
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:58 pm
Vehicle: NA6

Re: How to ruin the handling of an MX5.by Norman H Gar

Postby username » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:44 pm

Not gonna bother reading 6 pages of stuff, but these pics might help contribute

Image
Image
Image
Image
"signatures - a good place for a list of your cars modifications" -Jace


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 414 guests