light load misfire

Discussion regarding Turbocharged and supercharged MX-5s

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, The American, Lokiel, Sean

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: light load misfire

Postby gslender » Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:48 am

email me a log of the problem and tell me exactly where in the log it is missing. gslender at gmail
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: light load misfire

Postby gslender » Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:43 pm

Just looking at the log and I'm initially very concerned.

1) AFR is mostly see-sawing between 13 and 15 - odd behaviour?

2) MAP is very odd and flat... not what I'd expect either... max is 30kPa and min 15 - WTF?

3) PW is 1.0 - !! :shock: 1.0 ms... that can't be right... but yup it is, max logged PW is 2.0 - so I can only assume this old firmware is broken in logging the correct PW

4) GVE rocks between 57 and 58.... that's it...

This log is bonkers and I can't make sense of much of what I'm seeing.

The tune MSQ looks ok.

It is going lean, and the map sensor isn't really showing the correct true manifold pressure - it can't be only between 15 and 30 kPA... impossible. There is a period in the log where RPM starts at ~1000rpm and then engine revs climbs to nearly 3000rpm in 6 seconds and MAP goes spastic hitting 30kPA in very a few spots, then settles at 22kPa where it remains mostly flat for the entire rest of the steady rpm (where you begin to have misfires and RPM oscilations).

Something is sick - I'd start with the MAP and get it reporting correctly. Take more logs and study them.

G
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: light load misfire

Postby gslender » Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:36 pm

Checked the log you emailed this morning - I'd say it is also concerning.

You have 106kPa as being the highest MAP value reached. Unlikely in a turbo, and the curise manifold pressure is mostly in the low 30s.... again very unlikely.

My guess is that you have either a faulty sensor, or the ECU isn't calibrated for the sensor you have. Either way you need to get that fixed as we are trying to fix something that is already got something else broken.

Also, the AFR is generally all over the place. Really messy and as if you have major tune issues (it needs to be way, way more stable) so maybe it is spark (as that would defintely show up that way) but if it is pulling strong then that is odd and I would say it isn't - also if it idles ok, then I'd be against it being spark.

My vote is that it is probably running too lean all over, or you have a vacuum leak that is 1) making it run lean and 2) mucking up the MAP signal (but normally that goes in the other way, with values centred around atmos 100kPa).

Keep looking and fix up that map value.

G
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: light load misfire

Postby gslender » Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:00 pm

ozi_milhouse wrote:What would you suggest a normal Map reading at cruise would be? i would have thought 30ish is about right?


In your log I am seeing closer to 20kPa as being the MAP during cruise conditions (ie steady state TP > 5% with RPM siting in a steady band around 3000).

I would normally see around 40kPa as being the normal for that type of cruise event.

Elsewhere in the log you hit 23% throttle and the MAP jumps to 28kPa... that's not right. It should be at least 60-100 kPa with that much throttle open.

On average, your map value was 28kPa... so extremly low that I'm just skeptical.

Also, I doubt very much that your MAP only ever got higher than 106kPa as during those 100% TP periods the turbo should have been producing some kind of additional air pressure, even if just 2 psi above atmos, that would be at least 112kPa so I'd be surprised if you didn't do better than that, but you are right, it would be techinically possible to not hit a hint of boost, though I'm just surprised that you didn't - at all, ever, anywhere.

G
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

User avatar
jerrah
Racing Driver
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:54 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: light load misfire

Postby jerrah » Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:56 pm

As Gslender knows I had a bad MPXH6400 mapdaddy sensor in my Megasquirt. We swapped it to a stock MPX4250AP which resolved my MAP weirdness. My MPXH6400 had an incorrect reading for ambient pressure (engine off) even after calibration.

Do you have a boost gauge? What does your megasquirt log when it's in boost? What reading do you get with the engine off?
1991 MX5

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: light load misfire

Postby gslender » Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:03 pm

jerrah wrote:As Gslender knows I had a bad MPXH6400 mapdaddy sensor in my Megasquirt. We swapped it to a stock MPX4250AP which resolved my MAP weirdness. My MPXH6400 had an incorrect reading for ambient pressure (engine off) even after calibration.

Do you have a boost gauge? What does your megasquirt log when it's in boost? What reading do you get with the engine off?


Good point!

Confirm your map reading is 101 when ignition on, but engine not running/cranking. If not then your map sensor is bad or calibration is out.

G
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

User avatar
jerrah
Racing Driver
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:54 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: light load misfire

Postby jerrah » Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:59 pm

66kpa with the engine off is very wrong and you can't trust what it's reading.

Either you're out of calibration or it's broken. It's why the readings don't make sense in your log file.

Have you tried recalibrating it? What sensor model are you calibrating it for in Tunerstudio?
1991 MX5

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: light load misfire

Postby gslender » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:57 pm

ozi_milhouse wrote: I briefly ran hi res firmware last night and the miss was imperceptible. which leads me to believe it could be an injector issue?


I hate troubleshooting problems when something else is wrong.

The tune doesn't look like its scaled correct for 66kpa and it is running lean almost everywhere except wot.

Fix the map sensor or at least see what its like when it is working correctly.

We couldn't get jarrahs to tune and run right until we fixed the map sensor. As soon as we did it ran beaut!

G
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: light load misfire

Postby gslender » Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:17 am

How certain are you that the o2 sensor is correct? At 11afr it should be stumbling again... Too rich. If you're saying it's running ok, then maybe it's also reporting incorrectly. When was the last free air calibration?

G
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: light load misfire

Postby NitroDann » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:23 am

The guage is wrong and the car is too lean.

So back to my original post.

Configure everything properly and tune it.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: light load misfire

Postby NitroDann » Fri Aug 24, 2012 1:06 pm

theres no such thing as no calibration :?

Calibrate it or use a different WB02

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

manga_blue
Forum Guru
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Moruya, NSW

Re: light load misfire

Postby manga_blue » Fri Aug 24, 2012 2:53 pm

’95 NA8

User avatar
jerrah
Racing Driver
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:54 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: light load misfire

Postby jerrah » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:54 pm

My AEM gauge is offset to the analog as per the link posted above but doesn't affect the accuracy of the unit as long as you apply the correct offsets in tunerstudio. That said it still would need to be wired in correctly.

It would see strange that bad injectors/plugs or wires would run fine but just have a miss at 3000rpm.

Obvious things: Have you checked your base timing on the motor?

Could you warm up the car and take a log and post the current tune you're using? I've never found the 'autotune' in tunerstudio to work 100% without some thinking of the operator to ignore the faulty tuning. Make sure you go through and ensure all your sensors are calibrated including o2.

Having a working MAP sensor will help tremendously when you get it dyno'ed again.
1991 MX5

User avatar
gslender
Speed Racer
Posts: 2330
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Re: light load misfire

Postby gslender » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:56 pm

Further diagnosis....

When free revving, can you determine which cylinder is causing the miss?

In which case, you can track it by swapping either spark plug, lead, or fuel injector to see if it follows the move.

G
MX5 91 NA6 LE completely stock and loving it!
MX5 92 NA8/ITBs Silver "aka Track Beeotch"


Return to “MX5 Forced induction (Turbo/Supercharger)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests