Catalytic question

Discussion regarding Turbocharged and supercharged MX-5s

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, The American, Lokiel, -alex, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, Sean

User avatar
bootz
Racing Driver
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:13 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: The Wild Wild West

Catalytic question

Postby bootz » Wed Aug 15, 2012 6:55 pm

I was given a monster cat from a turbo car, a Mitsubishi EVO which had its exhaust upgraded.

In common with most (all?) turbo cars the pipe is significantly caked with thick black soot.
I understand Turbo/Detonation/Run Rich for safety is the scenario that leads to this.

On a technical level, how the hell can the cat still do its job under the circumstances?
If this rich layer of soot renders the cat inoperable that would mean most if not all turbo cars are illegal in an emissions sense. :?:
At the very least the thick soot on the screens would render the air flow less efficient.

Can the cat screens be cleaned?
How do you test the efficiency of an old cat? I would imagine that some sort of exhaust gas analyser is used, not sure how difficult it might be.

In the same path of questioning, how does the NB, SE, SP exhaust sensor (O2?) and ECU interact with the cat?
An exhaust fabricator told me the car would run crap without the cat, not that I am thinking of deleting.

I have searched this forum without luck, so hope some of the engineering/tech genius's can provide answers.
Bootz and Boof - On the road to somewhere.

User avatar
dbr
Fast Driver
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:36 pm
Vehicle: NB8A - Turbo
Location: Victoria, near Geelong

Re: Catalytic question

Postby dbr » Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:05 pm

Vehicle exhaust emissions are measured over a drive cycle that all but the most underpowered vehicles can cover at part throttle.
Most modern vehicles use 3-way catalysts that only achieve the reduction of all 3 regulated toxic gasses when the air-fuel ratio is near Stiok.
At heavy loads, the engines run rich of Stoik and the catalyst gas conversion efficiency is low but this is outside the regulations.
At lower loads, the catalyst will still run hot enough to burn off the soot (if it is not to much) and regain conversion efficiency.

I do not recommend trying to clean the catalyst because you will probably damage the surface coating that gennerates the catalytic reaction.

Swapping catalyst from one type of vehicle to another may result in non-compliance. Vehicle manufacturers try to use the cheepest catalyst thay can to meet the regulations for 80,000km. As a result they will match the washcoat, catalyst possition and engine calibration.
After market catalysts tend to have lower loadings than thsoe used by vehicle manufacturers (ie. even cheeper) and may only comply when new, if at all.

The only way to confirm emisson compliance is to run a proper test on a rolling road dyno with the appropiate analysers.
Portable analysers can show if there is some activity in the catalyst if the catalyst is warm (drive the car first and stick the analyser up the tail pipe immediately you stop). Similiarly, maesuring a temperature rise of the exhaust gas passing through the catalyst will indicate some activity (the chemical reaction is exothermic).

User avatar
bruce
Speed Racer
Posts: 7707
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Re: Catalytic question

Postby bruce » Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:18 pm

I've got a stock Evo 6 cat lying in the garage trying to rust.
Never give it away as they have scrap value due to the platinum in them (never heard a wrecker buy them though). In America people steal cats from parked cars (4wds as they're higher).

User avatar
bootz
Racing Driver
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:13 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: The Wild Wild West

Re: Catalytic question

Postby bootz » Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:35 pm

So even though it has crap on it the cat may still work, but even if it didn't, who would know or care?
This one seems to be massive with 3in outlets. It might be interesting if I ever turboed the car. I don't see a NA car needing anything this big.

What about the car running poorly without a cat? Is that a load of hogwash?
Bootz and Boof - On the road to somewhere.

sailaholic
Speed Racer
Posts: 3511
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:38 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane

Re: Catalytic question

Postby sailaholic » Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:25 pm

My understanding is Some cars have O2 sensors or similar after cats, so if the exhaust gas isn't clean enough it hobbles the car.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

User avatar
bootz
Racing Driver
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:13 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: The Wild Wild West

Re: Catalytic question

Postby bootz » Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:05 pm

sailaholic wrote:My understanding is Some cars have O2 sensors or similar after cats, so if the exhaust gas isn't clean enough it hobbles the car.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2


But not applicable to MX-5's ?
Bootz and Boof - On the road to somewhere.

sailaholic
Speed Racer
Posts: 3511
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:38 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane

Re: Catalytic question

Postby sailaholic » Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:25 pm

Not na, don't think nb. Can't comment on nc.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

User avatar
jerrah
Racing Driver
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:54 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: Catalytic question

Postby jerrah » Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:44 am

Car should run OK without one (see racecars) but it has all the negative effects for the environment. As long as it's not a restriction in your exhaust I can't see a larger one would be bad unless its not coming up to temperature.

I've always just fitted new ones when changing exhaust and not thought more about it.
1991 MX5

vrmmmpshhh
Racing Driver
Posts: 533
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: Catalytic question

Postby vrmmmpshhh » Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:22 am

The NA has what looks to be a temp sensor in the cat. What are people doing for aftermarket setups?

sailaholic
Speed Racer
Posts: 3511
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 3:38 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Brisbane

Re: Catalytic question

Postby sailaholic » Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:15 am

I think that is jdm cars only. My guess is remove it and the light in the dash :-P

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Catalytic question

Postby NitroDann » Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:22 am

I just cut one off a stock cat and rewelded it to a custom mid pipe i made.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

emily_mx5
Racing Driver
Posts: 1720
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 5:57 pm
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Sydney

Re: Catalytic question

Postby emily_mx5 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:17 pm

NitroDann wrote:I just cut one off a stock cat and rewelded it to a custom mid pipe i made.

Dann


Yes this was for me and it works very well!!

Dezza Bot
Driver
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:39 pm
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Central Coast, NSW

Re: Catalytic question

Postby Dezza Bot » Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:32 pm

vrmmmpshhh wrote:The NA has what looks to be a temp sensor in the cat. What are people doing for aftermarket setups?

Leave it unplugged. That'll leave the light off on the dash and shouldn't affect performance. (On a '90 Eunos as least..)
Speed costs money. How fast would you like to spend?

Mr Sexy
Fast Driver
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 7:46 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2
Location: Western Australia

Re: Catalytic question

Postby Mr Sexy » Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:56 pm

Could maybe clean it the way you would a silencer, soak it in fuel, then light it and let it burn

User avatar
hks_kansei
Speed Racer
Posts: 6154
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Victoria

Re: Catalytic question

Postby hks_kansei » Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:23 pm

Mr Sexy wrote:Could maybe clean it the way you would a silencer, soak it in fuel, then light it and let it burn


I'm pretty sure one of the things that causes cats to become clogged/collapsed is running too rich which causes the fuel to burn in the cat, and overheats it.


I can easily see soaking it in fuel and burning it to rather exagerrate the above.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)


Return to “MX5 Forced induction (Turbo/Supercharger)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests