Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Engines, Transmissions & Final Drive questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel

zephyrus17
Fast Driver
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 10:32 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Adelaide

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby zephyrus17 » Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:15 pm

Did you let the engine die after the first spray?

I have to say, though, that cleaner didn't do much to my engine. Only a bit of smoke, and that's it. Does it mean my engine's clean? Highly doubt it at 180,000kms, but it might not have just done much
Momo (aka 1990 white NA6)

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby NitroDann » Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:24 pm

If you run premium, keep good oil in it, and you dont have blow by its unlikely this stuff will help much.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

Sailor
Racing Driver
Posts: 1064
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:49 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Southie...NOT from " the Shire " :/.

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby Sailor » Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:50 pm

NitroDann wrote:If you run premium, keep good oil in it, and you dont have blow by its unlikely this stuff will help much.

Dann


Indeed!
Subarus need it and need it often because they are not a particularly good engine design with lots of oily blowby and subsequent fouling of the inlet tract.
Rob


05 NCLE, Cosworth SC,PF01,Ohlins,Selby,GWR exh
"We're only given a tiny spark of madness.We mustn't lose it"(Robin Williams)

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby NitroDann » Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:56 pm

To be fair, they just have a lot more liquid blowby, as opposed to gas blowby due to the heads being so low compared to the sump.

But yeah.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

marty085
Racing Driver
Posts: 706
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:08 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Blakehurst NSW

Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby marty085 » Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:06 pm

NitroDann wrote:If you.. keep good oil in it

Dann, what do you consider "good oil"? Note: I'm not asking what oils ppl use as has been asked many times. Just wondering how i can tell a good oil from a bad oil... Reputable brand? I am intending to simply use good brand dino oil (eg Castrol magnatec or something) in my newly rebuilt engine along with premium fuel.

zephyrus17
Fast Driver
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 10:32 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Adelaide

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby zephyrus17 » Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:37 pm

NitroDann wrote:If you run premium, keep good oil in it, and you dont have blow by its unlikely this stuff will help much.

Dann

Yeah, I use at least 95RON due to my 14deg timing. Don't think 98RON is going to be any better for me other than the extra lightness in my wallet.
Momo (aka 1990 white NA6)

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby NitroDann » Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:05 pm

Oh so wrong, but busy so ill let someone else explain.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

zephyrus17
Fast Driver
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 10:32 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Adelaide

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby zephyrus17 » Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:35 pm

Well, as far as I know, isn't RON just the resistance to combustion? Running to low will cause pre-ignition, but running too high could also decrease efficiency because some of the fuel isn't ignited
Momo (aka 1990 white NA6)

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby NitroDann » Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:16 am

Premium isnt only called premium because the octane is higher.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

zephyrus17
Fast Driver
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 10:32 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Adelaide

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby zephyrus17 » Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:32 am

Yeah, I know, there's cleaning agents and stuff. But I'm just thinking the difference between 95 and 98, other than the octane, isn't really much. Or at least, I don't think it's much to justify the price increase.
Momo (aka 1990 white NA6)

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby NitroDann » Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:09 am

What about the fuel economy increase?

It costs just a few dollars a tank and can save you from many vehicular ailments that cost 80/h minimum just to have looked at.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
Okibi
Speed Racer
Posts: 10906
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby Okibi » Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:16 am

http://www.miata.net/garage/KnowYourCar/S10_Timing.html

The risk in advancing the timing is that the flame front (the increase in pressure) from the burning air/fuel mix strikes the piston head before, at, or too close to TDC to create the optimum forward rotation of the crank.

If the downward force reaches the top of the piston before the piston is able to react with a downward motion then the force is directly to the crank, rather than to the rotation (a bit like how landing on a stiff leg transmits the jar to the hip).

The ignite and burn time for 98 RON fuel is longer than 92 RON fuel. Lower RON fuels means the flame front hits the piston top sooner than with a high-octane fuel. If the flame front hits the piston too soon the crank angle will not be in the optimum angle range to commence its downward stroke. The result can be pinging cause by premature detonation. That is why higher-octane fuel can be good insurance if the timing is advanced.
If you had access to a car like this, would you take it back right away? Neither would I.

zephyrus17
Fast Driver
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 10:32 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Adelaide

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby zephyrus17 » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:03 am

Thanks for the link, Okibi. I know all that.. But I guess I feel it's a bit hard to justify from my point of view. I'll look more into it :lol:
Momo (aka 1990 white NA6)

User avatar
Zcootz
Fast Driver
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:15 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Phillip Island

Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby Zcootz » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:12 am

I prefer my wallet to be a bit lighter when I refill rather that much lighter due to a rebuild because of stuffed bearings. ;)
With two laps to go then the action will begin, unless this is the action, which it is.
Murray Walker

User avatar
Okibi
Speed Racer
Posts: 10906
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

Re: Subaru Upper Engine Cleaner review...

Postby Okibi » Sun Mar 18, 2012 11:53 am

zephyrus17 what are you using to detect engine knock / pinging?
If you had access to a car like this, would you take it back right away? Neither would I.


Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest