Roll Over Protection discussion
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 6444
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Roll Over Protection discussion
odd conclusion to come to- Tony's post might need re reading
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:00 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Roll Over Protection discussion
Zcootz wrote:I'm trying to decide between the BD bar and MX+ bar and something I've noticed with BD bar is that the soft top doesn't seem to sit completely flat when down. Is this the same with the MX+ bar ?
Also anyone sprinting with the twin hoop MX+ bar ? Looking at the footage of the Cobra roll I've go to wonder if the single hoop bar is much safer than the twin hoop designs.
Cheers,
Mark
The single hoop MX5+ bar is higher than the twin hoop if thats a concern.
- Zcootz
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:15 pm
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Phillip Island
Roll Over Protection discussion
Thanks Muzdaman, I was wondering about that as well. I prefer the look of the twin hoop but it seemed a bit low, you've just confirmed it for me. Thanks
With two laps to go then the action will begin, unless this is the action, which it is.
Murray Walker
Murray Walker
- greenMachine
- Forum Guru
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NB SE
- Location: Sports car paradise - Canberra
- Contact:
Re: Roll Over Protection discussion
If CAMS specs/certification is required, forget single hoop and twin hoop designs, it needs to be a single full width bar, with a diagonal and bracing. Check the CAMS tech regs for ROPS.
It probably has something to with letting someone run with a bar that does not meet their requirements, ever heard of liability ?
If anyone has a non-certified bar which meets the specs (again, see the CAMS handbook) they should check out the 'self-certify' route.
BTW badgers, that comment is not only pretty dumb, it's also probably actionable by both CAMS and David Brown. I suggest you edit it.
It probably has something to with letting someone run with a bar that does not meet their requirements, ever heard of liability ?
If anyone has a non-certified bar which meets the specs (again, see the CAMS handbook) they should check out the 'self-certify' route.
BTW badgers, that comment is not only pretty dumb, it's also probably actionable by both CAMS and David Brown. I suggest you edit it.
I never met a horsepower I didn't like (thanks bwob)
Build thread
NB SE - gone to the dark side (and loving it )
Build thread
NB SE - gone to the dark side (and loving it )
-
- Forum Guru
- Posts: 4897
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Moruya, NSW
Re: Roll Over Protection discussion
What GM said. Hoop designs only permitted for single seaters. The good thing CAMS has done now is consolidate all roll cage regs into one schedule.
http://www.camsmanual.com.au/pdf/10_gen ... 2012-1.pdf
http://www.camsmanual.com.au/pdf/10_gen ... 2012-1.pdf
’95 NA8
- Deni.07
- Learner Driver
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:06 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Roll Over Protection discussion
thinking of getting the hard dog one that goes through the boot but have been told it may be illegal to cut the parcel tray in qld? is this true. will
it pass mod plate and all other rules.
http://www.gomiata.com/harcorhar.html
it pass mod plate and all other rules.
http://www.gomiata.com/harcorhar.html
- Zcootz
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:15 pm
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Phillip Island
Re: Roll Over Protection discussion
Unless there's been a recent change CAMS aren't too keen on rear legs through the parcel shelf
With two laps to go then the action will begin, unless this is the action, which it is.
Murray Walker
Murray Walker
- Deni.07
- Learner Driver
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:06 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Roll Over Protection discussion
Zcootz wrote:Unless there's been a recent change CAMS aren't too keen on rear legs through the parcel shelf
not really worried about cams atm just transport department and mod plate for road use..
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:43 pm
- Vehicle: NB SE
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Roll Over Protection discussion
I was looking at the Hard Dog bars before just settling on the MX5 Plus Tall Boy roll bar. Managed to set up a very cheap GB for them.
The HD roll bars don't go through the parcel shelf. The metal piece that is trimmed is actually held in by multiple bolts. So it isn't structural. It provides a barrier between the boot and the cabin. I simply removed mine when I had the MazdaSpeed cage in my SE.
The HD roll bars don't go through the parcel shelf. The metal piece that is trimmed is actually held in by multiple bolts. So it isn't structural. It provides a barrier between the boot and the cabin. I simply removed mine when I had the MazdaSpeed cage in my SE.
Return to “MX5 Body, Paint, Interior & Trim”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 227 guests