Are you having overheating issues James?, or you want to do things a little different than everyone else?, or just pre-empting possible problems with more boost?
or all the above?
I'm guessing you are simply wanting to get the charged air as cold as possible.
We haven't kept in touch for ages so I forgot what other stuff is on your car (and I'm too lazy to flick through your garage thread), but did you have an oil cooler and/or coolant re-route?
Smaller Radiator
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy
- Steampunk
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:16 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Southside of Breeze-bane
- plohl
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:13 am
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Smaller Radiator
FSAE Rule of thumb: Cooling system should be able remove 1/3 of max engine power as heat.
Civics with aftermarket smaller cross-section, thicker radiators generally run type r engines (from my observations)- stock these produce more power than most mod'd mx5s. Comparing a BP’s to any k series or b series honda type r engine is a joke. Not only are they making more power, but they are making more power at a higher RPM (if you can’t see why this is significant, stop reading now).
So what is to stop a radiator that is suitable for these high powered Honda engines? What are the other key components/ factors of a system?
Fluid flow rates play an important role in the efficiency of a cooling system = water pump and fan/air flow (car speed)/air temperature (can't control the air temp)
So, what is the flow rate of a standard 5 water pump at X RPM? How does this compare to that of k or b series type r engine at X RPM?
What is the pressure drop through each radiator?
What is the pressure drop across the face (front to rear) of the radiator? Thicker core will have a higher pressure drop due to skin friction between the fins and the air. On radiator core – there are stupid amounts of differences between the fins alone. Not all radiator cores are created equal!
What is the recommended operating temperature for each engine?
There are 2 main methods to calculate the efficiency of a heat exchanger – both require much more detail than what I have listed above (for those playing at home – LMTD and eNTU).
I suggest doing some research to find out how much power the Honda engines are running with similar sized radiators and how their water pump differs in performance to that of the 5. You might find that due to the higher rev’s the Honda water pumps have a greater flow rate.
Cheers,
plohl
plohl
- 7Hazi
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:49 am
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Smaller Radiator
NitroDann wrote:Over 200kw... Nope. Doubt it.
Dann
Apparently it's bored/stroked to 2.1L (if I remember correctly). Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGGmstUr ... r_embedded
- NitroDann
- Forum sponsor
- Posts: 10280
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Newcastle NSW
- Contact:
Re: Smaller Radiator
The honda argument isnt fair, the cumbustion chamber in a B/K series is much more efficient, as for the rpm of the water pump, a new pulley would fix that EASY.
Dann
Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com
speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.
- plohl
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:13 am
- Vehicle: NA8
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Smaller Radiator
It is more efficient because if makes more power per cc? Is it more efficient because it uses less fuel to make that power?
Not disagreeing with you, the heat has to go somewhere though.
Not disagreeing with you, the heat has to go somewhere though.
Cheers,
plohl
plohl
- NitroDann
- Forum sponsor
- Posts: 10280
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Newcastle NSW
- Contact:
Re: Smaller Radiator
In every way.
They make more power per gram of fuel used, therefore more heat energy is used to make power, less goes into the water jackets.
Dann
They make more power per gram of fuel used, therefore more heat energy is used to make power, less goes into the water jackets.
Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com
speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.
- Aussie Stig
- Stig
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:14 pm
Re: Smaller Radiator
NitroDann wrote:In every way.
They make more power per gram of fuel used, therefore more heat energy is used to make power, less goes into the water jackets.
Dann
Dann it sounds like you made that one up on the spot.
It is a known fact that 50% of people are of less than average intelligence
- NitroDann
- Forum sponsor
- Posts: 10280
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Newcastle NSW
- Contact:
Re: Smaller Radiator
Over 12:1 compression, improved swirl due to one intake valve opening before another, looks at the ports, and yet they make more torque through the midrange than a BP.
Research it yourself.
Dann
Research it yourself.
Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com
speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.
- 16bit
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 2346
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:51 pm
- Vehicle: NB8A - Supercharged
- Location: Brisbane Southside
Re: Smaller Radiator
this is not thread about why a honda engine is more efficient than a mazda engine people.
I had an idea, I had concerns about it. I asked for opinions which every has so kindly offered various points of view and evidence, which i appreciated.
however please stay on topic or take it to the OT Lounge. it is a very interesting topic though...
I had an idea, I had concerns about it. I asked for opinions which every has so kindly offered various points of view and evidence, which i appreciated.
however please stay on topic or take it to the OT Lounge. it is a very interesting topic though...
98 evo gold - rotrexed and loving it.
This post has been printed using recycled pixels
This post has been printed using recycled pixels
Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests