Roll Over Protection discussion

Body, Paint, Interior and Trim questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

User avatar
de Bounce
Racing Driver
Posts: 1091
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:19 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Northern Burbs - Melbourne

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby de Bounce » Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:52 pm

snshami wrote:Anyway has anyone installed one themselves. How long would it take someone. Is a few hours realistic? Any traps I should be aware of.

There is a thread with a fair bit of info HERE
Plus a link to the installation instructions HERE

4 - 5 hours at a relaxed pace is good.
Only issues I had was getting a glue to hold the captive nut near the top seat belt mounts and finding a way of drilling the holes in the parcel shelf in the NB, NA should have more clearance as you can zip out the rear window.
2011 NC2 PRHT SE in Dolphin Grey
2001 NB8B in Crystal Blue - Sold :(
Motorkhana Video

User avatar
snshami
Racing Driver
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:21 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Doreen, Victoria

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby snshami » Tue Apr 12, 2011 11:11 pm

manga_blue wrote:
snshami wrote:I wonder if it is because people are pushing them so hard or is it something at the very limit that makes them unstable if not setup properly.
I think that when they're near the limit it just takes a little something extra to throw them over - like a gutter, or a rock, or a bank. These are all incidents more likely on the road than the track. Having said that I was speaking to a guy who had almost rolled at turn 4 at Wakefield. He cut the apex a little tight, clipped that stupid inside ripple strip and it launched up 30 or 40 degrees. The crowd down the bottom all saw his floorpan.



Then there is this dude. No rollbar and no helmet...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0Rpggyt ... r_embedded

Now that's what I call dynamic drifting....:)

I cannot wait to try it but now that I have paid for it will wait till my rollbar is in place
------------------------
1997 NA8 Neo Green - Limited Edition

deviant
Racing Driver
Posts: 1717
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:23 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Rockingham - Western Australia

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby deviant » Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:34 am

snshami wrote:
manga_blue wrote:
snshami wrote:I wonder if it is because people are pushing them so hard or is it something at the very limit that makes them unstable if not setup properly.
I think that when they're near the limit it just takes a little something extra to throw them over - like a gutter, or a rock, or a bank. These are all incidents more likely on the road than the track. Having said that I was speaking to a guy who had almost rolled at turn 4 at Wakefield. He cut the apex a little tight, clipped that stupid inside ripple strip and it launched up 30 or 40 degrees. The crowd down the bottom all saw his floorpan.



Then there is this dude. No rollbar and no helmet...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0Rpggyt ... r_embedded

Now that's what I call dynamic drifting....:)

I cannot wait to try it but now that I have paid for it will wait till my rollbar is in place


Having looked at what passes for 'safety' at club level motorsport over there I would NEVER look to Japan for advice on it!!

User avatar
snshami
Racing Driver
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:21 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Doreen, Victoria

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby snshami » Wed Apr 13, 2011 8:19 pm

deviant wrote:
Having looked at what passes for 'safety' at club level motorsport over there I would NEVER look to Japan for advice on it!!



You are quite correct. It reminds me of when I visited a Mazda manufacturing facility in Hiroshima. We were asked to make sure we always wore our safety caps otherwise we could be asked to leave. I thought the word cap was merely a translation error and we would be given a regular hardhat. Imagine my surprise when they handed out a simple baseball cap made of cloth. It made it easier for people to hit their head because of the visor blocking upwards visibility.
------------------------
1997 NA8 Neo Green - Limited Edition

deviant
Racing Driver
Posts: 1717
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:23 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Rockingham - Western Australia

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby deviant » Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:24 am

I imported a trackday AW11 MR2 from Japan a few years back, the harness was missing when it got here but the mounts were still there. The lap section was using the stock seat belt points which is okay but the mounts for the shoulder belts were mounted on the bulkhead behind the seats but down near the floor so that the shoulder belts would have gone over your shoulders and then imediately gone vertically down; instant spine damage in even a minor bump doing that! Oh and the eye bolts were only mounted through the carpet and its rubber and fibreboard backing!!!! At least they had used a spreader plate to stop the bolt tearing through the wood / carpet :roll:

True story!

User avatar
orx626
Forum sponsor
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 8:26 am
Vehicle: NC - Rotary
Location: Brisbane - Northside
Contact:

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby orx626 » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:13 pm

Well how about that!!!!

As far as Mazda are concerned the steel structure under those plastic covers on the NC is a "Roll Bar"!!!! :P

Image


Here is their US Patent in all its glory!!! I've got no idea what performance standards it was designed to meet (probably their own). However, they clearly describe its intended function in the event of a roll over!!!

Enjoy!!! :mrgreen:

Cheers,
Danny


Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

NMX516
Speed Racer
Posts: 2057
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:05 pm
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Brisbane

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby NMX516 » Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:00 am

Excellent post Danny! :D

Cue Morlock with the but, but, but, but...... :roll:
Pain is temporary, quitting lasts forever.

User avatar
PaulF
Racing Driver
Posts: 1807
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:55 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle, NSW

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby PaulF » Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:26 am

snshami wrote:
manga_blue wrote:
snshami wrote:I wonder if it is because people are pushing them so hard or is it something at the very limit that makes them unstable if not setup properly.
I think that when they're near the limit it just takes a little something extra to throw them over - like a gutter, or a rock, or a bank. These are all incidents more likely on the road than the track. Having said that I was speaking to a guy who had almost rolled at turn 4 at Wakefield. He cut the apex a little tight, clipped that stupid inside ripple strip and it launched up 30 or 40 degrees. The crowd down the bottom all saw his floorpan.



Then there is this dude. No rollbar and no helmet...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0Rpggyt ... r_embedded

Now that's what I call dynamic drifting....:)

I cannot wait to try it but now that I have paid for it will wait till my rollbar is in place

It's alright, because:
A. He's wearing a race suit and gloves :wink: and
B. He's the drift king!

Mr Morlock
Speed Racer
Posts: 6444
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Melbourne

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby Mr Morlock » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:31 pm

always the sceptic. What the US does is not always relevant to other places- this is the land that does not even legislate in all states for seatbelts and they still have not worked out the value of helmets for motorcyclists. I still pose what I think is a valid question and that is if it is an approved and truly useful safety feature then why is not so advertised in Australia as such by Mazda?

For an NC the product is at least part of the vehicle and designed for it. For other MX5's it is designed to fit as best it can ie an afterthought. In view of the 70 odd pages of the new legislation on safety cages and roll bars there is detailed criteria on clearances for drivers and passenger -do the locally made units comply? Presumably when the legislation is enacted then any local manufacturer will either get a tick or have to redesign or withdraw. Those that are in the industry may care to advise us.

User avatar
dave2221
Fast Driver
Posts: 493
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:01 pm
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Sydney

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby dave2221 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:40 pm

a proper affro will protect you in a rollover.


Just saying

User avatar
Guran
Speed Racer
Posts: 3754
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:42 pm
Vehicle: ND - 1.5
Location: Albion Park NSW
Contact:

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby Guran » Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:23 pm

There's a difference between being sceptical and being blatantly obstinate. This is a US patent, but it is based on a couple of Japanese patents (Dec 2003 priority date), and has also been granted in Europe as EP 1547874. Mazda's statement in patents that this device is a rollbar is NOT specific to the USA alone.
Standard 2006 NC - YouTube
WP 1:11.89 | SMP-S 1:05.90 GP 1:54.93 N 1:18.09 L 2:22.49 | PW 1:02.52
PI 2:00.55 | W-S 1:12.44 W-L 1:43.36 | SR 1:33.25

nbse2

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby nbse2 » Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:32 pm

I did not want to start a new thread, however I will be purchasing a roll over bar and am deciding on whether to purchase the BD roll over or the MX5plus single hoop. I am trying to understand the signficance of the torque box of the MX5 plus bar, which the BD does not have. Does this provide a benefit that the BD does. The MX5+ bar I also understand sits a little further back than the BD bar which from the pictures and on reading the forum sits nearer to the drivers head. The + bar is dearer. Any feedback would be appreciated.

User avatar
Old Dude
Racing Driver
Posts: 1166
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 8:06 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby Old Dude » Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:27 pm

You really need to look at both bars and see how they mount and where they mount, and then decide which one you feel happier with. I looked at both bars and decided on the MX5+ twin hoop after a lot of investigation, Im sure there will be plenty who prefer the BD bar, But I felt the bolt placement was superior on the + bar.
Call both manufacturers and get the specs, both will be happy to talk to you, and then you can make an informed decision.
So unfortunately its back to you.

Cheers
Dale 8)
"Everybody dies......, but not everybody lives" ;-)

MX 5 2001 Grace Green
NB8B

User avatar
Mr nanotech
Racing Driver
Posts: 1487
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:35 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Rotting away in the 'Greater' City of Geelong...
Contact:

Re: Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby Mr nanotech » Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:02 pm

I've wondered this for a while now and there seems to be little point making a new thread for this question when we have a perfectly good active one right here :lol:

Why do Australian mx5 roll over bars mount on the rear parcel shelf? After seeing many international half cages, 90% of have the diagonal bars passing through the parcel shelf and onto more structural parts of the car. Seems like that would make more sense too as the parcel shelf is very thin and can be quite easily cut through.
I would surmise in a roll over event, the parcel shelf wouldn't be able to handle the load and would crumple. Especially if the car is put into the air and dropped upside down. Now keep in mind I have no engineering background so I have no idea if the parcel shelf would indeed be strong enough. But based on the thickness and so on, I don't why this is the chosen mounting point for us in Aus.
Factor in that most international cages and half cages for Miata's require modification to the parcel shelf so the diagonals can pass through, why is Australia different?

To me, it looks like the Hard dog bars and so forth would be a safer alternative to a BD or Plus bar. I'm not trying to undercut forum sponsors here and I have the utmost respect for our domestic market and our economy; but after some shipping ressearch, the Hard dog hardcore bars seem to be only $800-900 shipped to your door internationally. There are countless photo's of mx5's destroyed with this half cage in place, which would show that they do indeed work... quite well!!!
Which makes me wonder why our domestic manufacturers haven't copied this design. Could it be that CAMS have restrictions on the possible mounting places for our roll bars? I've read into the CAMS specs for half cages a while back but it's been forever since I've glimpsed so I don't recall specifics other than mounting at the seatbelt bolts, having at least one cross bar and two diagonals and that it must be constructed from steel.

And another question. *flame suit on* I know that this has been covered countless times but I'm still yet to see someone with a logical answer. Why are alloy bars considered unsafe? As I understand, the wall thickness of the alloy bars are greatly thickened so it will theoretically be as strong as a steel bar anyway.
As far as I recall, alloy bars have been used in racing for decades anyway.

Would anyone be able to shed some light on this?
Okibi wrote:Abusing Police because of a few corrupt or power hungry idiots is like calling all car enthusiasts hoons. :roll:

User avatar
bigdog
King of the kennel
Posts: 2233
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:07 pm
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Blue Mountains
Contact:

Roll Over Protection discussion

Postby bigdog » Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:06 pm

As a BD owner I would buy the + twin hoop next time round - preserves access to the soft top and would be easier to live with, and it would attract less attention from the law. I think both + designs are better thought out than BDs.
Image
Marvin - '02 Silver SP - BD, PSS9, Guru, Build #62 Cardomain


Return to “MX5 Body, Paint, Interior & Trim”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 221 guests