na6 performance

Engines, Transmissions & Final Drive questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy

lukearama
Driver
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 11:32 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: na6 performance

Postby lukearama » Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:29 pm

take out the flywheel and shave it like a pussy. just the big ugly bits on the outside. Then check your valve timing is as close to spec as possible. massive improvement in torque from 5000 to 7000. good for overtaking???? Cheap mod for real results. But other then that these B6 is just too small to give you the power to weight you get from a Lotus running the 2.0l. sorry, my friend took me for a drive in his Elise and now I hate my MX5... It feels like nothing more then a 323 with the engine facing the right direction.... Turbo would be the best $ spend... As long as you have a long nose. The short nose are prone to letting then front main bearing go. This info came from my engine machinist... Has been fixing a few broken bottom ends that got turbo'ed.
Apart from Mazda............ trust nothing else...

and1
Fast Driver
Posts: 368
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:43 pm
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Perth, WA

Re: na6 performance

Postby and1 » Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:55 pm

Which lotus' are 2.0L? The newer Elise and Exige use the 1.8L 2ZZ-GE Toyota engine.
2005 Velocity Red MX-5 SE
Garage thread
http://mx5cartalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=44487

User avatar
funmx5
Fast Driver
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:04 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Geelong

Re: na6 performance

Postby funmx5 » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:11 pm

i have been doing at bit of research on short nose crank issues ,mazda issued a different part no for crank lt bolt due to the short one being used,my engine is up to 260000km no smoke evident and still wants to rev
how much do you pay for an elise!
red na6
cx7

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: na6 performance

Postby NitroDann » Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:11 pm

lukearama wrote:take out the flywheel and shave it like a pussy. just the big ugly bits on the outside. Then check your valve timing is as close to spec as possible. massive improvement in torque from 5000 to 7000. good for overtaking???? Cheap mod for real results. But other then that these B6 is just too small to give you the power to weight you get from a Lotus running the 2.0l. sorry, my friend took me for a drive in his Elise and now I hate my MX5... It feels like nothing more then a 323 with the engine facing the right direction.... Turbo would be the best $ spend... As long as you have a long nose. The short nose are prone to letting then front main bearing go. This info came from my engine machinist... Has been fixing a few broken bottom ends that got turbo'ed.


Whats wrong with you? are you joking.. i sure hope so. Ive dríven an elise and been dríven in an exige and theres no way an elise or exige handles or goes better than my 5. Is yours completely stock or something? sure the elise manages a better comfort to handling ratio but theres no way a stock elise outhandles an mx5 with proper suspension. Not even close.
And you obviously havent been for a run in a budget turbo 5 putting down 'just' 200-250hp. Complete including car cost for well under ten grand and in a straight line much faster than most v8's.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

lukearama
Driver
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 11:32 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: na6 performance

Postby lukearama » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:40 pm

I think the Lotus V MX5 needs to be started in a different forum. Sorry... And yes the the series 1 elise is only a 1.8 not 2.0... my bad. I might also add then it is unfare to compare naturally aspirated to forced induction when doing comparisions. I think it is also poor to do a price / power to weight comparison.

If you are in the market for an impractical sports cars the lotus and the mx5 should both be considered. We could argue further the handling and drivng techniques required also even the cost of parts and panels. look forward to this discussion in another board index.
Apart from Mazda............ trust nothing else...

User avatar
Ollygt
Driver
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:18 pm

Re: na6 performance

Postby Ollygt » Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:16 pm

I wonder if Toyota engines are a viable alternative drop in.
My Corolla's 1.8L 7AFE isn't bad for low down torque and I can only imagine the newer 1.8's are even better.
In it's current state, my poor Mixy is will only just out handle my corolla and definitely will not beat it in a straight line.
But to be fair my Corolla is in much better condition and state of tune :)
Oh dear, the wick in the engine's gone out.

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: na6 performance

Postby NitroDann » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:32 am

A friend of mine just transplanted the new celica engine into his mr2.

Thats a quick engine, 140kw actually.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.


Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests