Wheel Alignment Figures

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

User avatar
ForceMajeure
Fast Driver
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:46 pm
Vehicle: NB8A

Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby ForceMajeure » Thu Feb 24, 2011 2:52 pm

I know there is plenty of threads on this but i had an alignment done today after recently getting new shocks and springs and asked for a standard Mx5 NB spec alignment as noone specializes in Mx5's around here otherwise id go to spinning wheel.

Im not at all happy with what has been done, seems i got the apprentice guy on my car, this is the print out, feel free to give your thoughts on where this is horribly wrong, The camber looks all wrong to me.

Front

Camber
Left -1.00
Right -1.30

Cross Camber +0.30

Castor
Left +6.03
Right +5.16

Individual Toe
Left +0.5mm
Right +0.5mm

Total Toe +1.0

Rear

Camber
Left -0.11
Right -1.28

Individual Toe
Left -0.1mm
Right +0.2mm

Total Toe +0.1mm

93_Clubman
Speed Racer
Posts: 11857
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Melbourne

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby 93_Clubman » Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:18 pm

This is the original wheel alignment thread:
viewtopic.php?f=76&t=15398

User avatar
ForceMajeure
Fast Driver
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:46 pm
Vehicle: NB8A

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby ForceMajeure » Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:46 pm

Cheers, i didnt find that one through search initially. One thing you wont find is more negative front camber than rear no matter what site you read, ive read a few now.

I have no idea why mine is so far out between left and right sides also.

Ive rung these guys up and am taking it back tommorrow morning, so i will be armed with some figures this time.

The vibe im getting is you want maximum castor, a little more negative camber on the back than the front, same at worst, and some toe in all round.

User avatar
Guran
Speed Racer
Posts: 3754
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:42 pm
Vehicle: ND - 1.5
Location: Albion Park NSW
Contact:

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby Guran » Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:36 pm

Problem is that the specification range for MX-5s is quite broad, and the alignment guys might be inclined to leave it if it's within the range. You end up with weird mismatches from side-to-side, or end-to-end. Consequently, you should really have an idea of what you want before you get the alignment, and ask them to aim for that. I'd expect you will get a better set-up when you go back.

You're on the right track with the alignment trends you've flagged. My set-up is as aggressive as possible with the stock suspension since my main use is on the track. That equates to maximum castor, maximum negative camber (around -1.1 to -1.5 deg front and around -2 deg rear can be achieved stock), and zero toe front & rear. I like this setup for the street too, and don't have any problems with instability. However, a milder street setup would be to add 1mm of toe-in front & rear, and less camber on the rear. The right-left balance should be equal too ... after allowing for the weight of a driver in the seat.
Standard 2006 NC - YouTube
WP 1:11.89 | SMP-S 1:05.90 GP 1:54.93 N 1:18.09 L 2:22.49 | PW 1:02.52
PI 2:00.55 | W-S 1:12.44 W-L 1:43.36 | SR 1:33.25

User avatar
rossint
Fast Driver
Posts: 460
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:56 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: ADELAIDE

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby rossint » Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:49 pm

Here's my last alignment done August last year after I put my coilovers in. I'm really happy with this set up but it is to be noted that my car is set up for track work, specifically for my local track. The printout also has the specifications for a standard alignment on it which I've included. It was done by Tyrepower Blackwood in Adelaide.

Front:
Caster- Spec 3.45 to 5.15
L 4.52deg
R 4.53deg
Camber- Spec -0.21 to 1.09
L -1.43deg
R -1.51deg
Toe- Spec 0 to 3.7
L 0.0mm
R -0.1mm

Rear:
Camber- Spec -1.13 to -0.13
L -2.30deg
R -2.28deg
Toe- Spec 0 to 3.7
L 1.7mm
R 1.4mm

User avatar
ForceMajeure
Fast Driver
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:46 pm
Vehicle: NB8A

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby ForceMajeure » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:19 pm

Guran wrote:Problem is that the specification range for MX-5s is quite broad, and the alignment guys might be inclined to leave it if it's within the range. You end up with weird mismatches from side-to-side, or end-to-end. Consequently, you should really have an idea of what you want before you get the alignment, and ask them to aim for that. I'd expect you will get a better set-up when you go back.


You are spot on, because i asked for a "standard NB" setup the poor guy was left with only the Mazda "Guidelines" to go by, and then all he really had to go off was my current setup, which was WAY WAY out given my suspension had just been done and lowered about 30mm. Of course not having the data off the current setup until after he had finished i couldn't offer any advice to him either.

Davex3 wrote:What the crap man! I'd be seriously pissed off if i took my car into a shop and they got the camber that different between sides. It should be the same all sides.

My current preference for my cars suspension is (SE with FM springs):
Front: -1.3 camber, 5 caster, 0 toe
Rear: -1 camber, 1mm toe in

The shop i get mine done at sees a lot of trailered in track cars. They always get the numbers within 0.05 of what i give them, if they can't hit the numbers i give them they call me.


No doubt he should of made a better effort than just diddling around with the original bad setup i came in with, i think he was stumped as what to do IMHO, he was only a green apprentice, not the Donald Trump type obviously. :lol:

Anyway im going back tomorrow armed with information, they will be MX5 alignment experts when all is said and done. :)

In hindsght i should of done my research before embarking on this fiasco. :idea:

User avatar
rossint
Fast Driver
Posts: 460
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:56 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: ADELAIDE

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby rossint » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:50 pm

As long as they fix it for free which it sounds like they're going to thats the main thing but I don't think it's too much to ask that a place that does alignments can find the standard figures for any mass produced car and figure a workable setting with in the range.

project.r.racing
Speed Racer
Posts: 3722
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:16 pm
Vehicle: Non MX-5
Location: Glasshouse Mountains, QLD

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby project.r.racing » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:38 pm

Looks to me like it has been aligned for a FWD car. (Excluding the mixed camber).

User avatar
ForceMajeure
Fast Driver
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:46 pm
Vehicle: NB8A

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby ForceMajeure » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:59 pm

project.r.racing wrote:Looks to me like it has been aligned for a FWD car. (Excluding the mixed camber).


That did cross my mind, and i fear its true. :idea:

He was not really a "car guy". :roll:

User avatar
jerrah
Racing Driver
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:54 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby jerrah » Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:27 pm

Davex3 wrote:The shop i get mine done at
Which shop is that?
1991 MX5

mazdatenfive

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby mazdatenfive » Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:10 am

Got my NA four wheel alignment done at Ross Forbes, Berkeley Vale NSW.
I have found these settings are great for my car, wheel, tyre & suspension combination and cost $60.

Rear Axle
Camber Left -0.35' Right -0.26'
Cross Camber -0.08'
Individual Toe Left +0.6mm Right +0.5mm
Setback +4.6mm

Front Axle
Castor Left +4.58' Right +4.47'
Camber Left -0.21' Right -0.21'
Cross Camber +0.00'
Individual Toe Left +0.7mm Right +0.7mm
Setback -5.1mm

User avatar
Charlie Brown
Speed Racer
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney, Just out of Dragon Territory over the bridge in the "Shire"
Contact:

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby Charlie Brown » Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:05 am

Davex3 wrote:What the crap man! I'd be seriously pissed off if i took my car into a shop and they got the camber that different between sides. It should be the same all sides.


Only provided that either you are sitting in the car when the alignment is done or that you have ballasted the drivers seat to match your weight.

If you’re not allowed to sit in the seat when the alignment is done or you haven't added ballast, the aligner must make allowance in the camber figures to bring the numbers back to even when you get in. With my weight that means 0.5 degrees more negative camber on the driver’s side.
Image

Wakefield 1:09.13 Eastern Creek GP 1:50.198 Ext 2:17.538 Sth 1:02.9003
Phillip Is 1:58.50 Winton Short 1:10.7 Lakeside 1:05.7711 MDTC 45.20

User avatar
ForceMajeure
Fast Driver
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:46 pm
Vehicle: NB8A

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby ForceMajeure » Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:35 am

Thanks for all the help and info, they re-did the job today and its fantastic IMO, we ended up with a combination of figures taken from this thread, the other alignment thread, my old alignment figures (which i found) and what he got right Yesterday (albeit not much!)

The guy has only been in the job 1 month he tells me, fresh apprentice, so with the bosses oversight we ended up with this which is a mid range between street and track i would think.

Front

Camber
Left -1.01
Right -1.08

Castor
Left +6.14
Right +6.14

Individual Toe
Left +0.5mm
Right +0.5mm

Setback -4.6

Rear

Camber
Left -1.31
Right -1.34

Individual Toe
Left +2.2mm
Right +2.0mm

User avatar
ForceMajeure
Fast Driver
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:46 pm
Vehicle: NB8A

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby ForceMajeure » Fri Feb 25, 2011 1:27 pm

Davex3 wrote:
Charlie Brown wrote:Only provided that either you are sitting in the car when the alignment is done or that you have ballasted the drivers seat to match your weight.

If you’re not allowed to sit in the seat when the alignment is done or you haven't added ballast, the aligner must make allowance in the camber figures to bring the numbers back to even when you get in. With my weight that means 0.5 degrees more negative camber on the driver’s side.


Yep for sure. I've been asked if i want to sit in the car when they do the allignment, but i couldn't be stuffed hanging round or coming down when they do it. Plus i don't think my crappy driving style will benifit from a correctly weighted allignment (maybe when i get better). :mrgreen: :lol:


One thing i've always found strange with the mx-5 community is people seem to prefer more negative camber in the rear than the front, which seems to go against every other rwd allignment. Spec miata and a lot of track guys in the usa run the standard more negative on the front. I've tried two different more negative camber on the rear setups with my car for shits and giggles and found it to be horrible.


I guess it depends on how high your car sits (front and back) and how flat (with sway bars) as to what negative camber may be best for your particular car, the trend (i see) is to lower your car to the max and run big negative camber on the rear, but with sway bars keeping your car flatter im told less negative camber should be used which is why i didn't go overboard, i was thinking of going for the same camber front and back as per some in this thread but in the end i compromised a bit to make the guys job a bit easier, although in hindsight he could have got any figure i threw at him given the boss was helping.

As this outfit is pretty keyed up with MX5 info i can now go back anytime with confidence and dial in another figure, which i will probaby try when i get new tyres which isnt far off. The figures i came up with in the end was my own, but it feels pretty good IMHO.

User avatar
Charlie Brown
Speed Racer
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney, Just out of Dragon Territory over the bridge in the "Shire"
Contact:

Re: Wheel Alignment Figures

Postby Charlie Brown » Fri Feb 25, 2011 4:33 pm

Davex3 wrote:The amount of camber really depends on if your car is tracked or street dríven (and how much on each), what tyres you are running and how you like you car to handle. I do know that street tyres require more negative camber to maintain optimal contact patch around the track than rspecs. Down side of aggressive negative camber on the street is that it wears your tyres quickly. :mrgreen:

:?:

I think you have that the wrong way around. R-spec tyres require more negative camber than street tyres. Depending on the R-spec tyre brand the ideal camber figure generally falls within the range of -3 to -4 degrees. Street tyres tend to be below -2 degrees for spirited driving.

The reason that NA’s & NB’s run half a degree more negative camber on the rear is due to the different front and rear camber curves that occur as the wheel travels up.
The lower the car goes the more negative camber you need. Just make sure if lowering your NA/NB that the front lower wishbone doesn’t go past the horizontal otherwise bump steer will occur. Have a read through Fat Cat Motorsports web pages.

The NC is a different kettle of fish as it has a completely different rear suspension setup. You can and I have run more negative camber on the front than the back.
I’m currently running around 2.5 degrees negative both ends due to the R-specs I use on track days. After 30,000 kilometres the inside wear on my road tyres was only about 1mm more than the outside using this figure. I’m sure it would have been more in a NA/NB because of the difference in suspension.
Image

Wakefield 1:09.13 Eastern Creek GP 1:50.198 Ext 2:17.538 Sth 1:02.9003
Phillip Is 1:58.50 Winton Short 1:10.7 Lakeside 1:05.7711 MDTC 45.20


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests