saboteur wrote:Did it get trashed while you were trying to do an update or did it just randomly happen? If the latter, that sounds concerning.
It got trashed while doing an update. Although I do get a miss match type error from time to time between megatune and the ecu. - Any idea what that is about.
Any way, I have had a very very frustrating day of tuning, but mainly because of my own ignorance
I thought moving from MAP to Alpha-N would be pretty straight forward, but it really is not. I thought I could just replace my MAP values with the corresponding TPS values. I got the car running and then found that the engine would die as soon as I touched the throttle. I found that I really need to have max resolution at the small throttle openings. My MAP VE table had more resolution at the oposite end, so that is how I set out with TPS.
After figuring out the resolution issue for myself, I did a bit more reading and found a couple of supporting articles on the web. It is interesting, because with Alpha-N at low rpm a 10% throttle opening right up to 100% all need the same fuel because at 10% (at low rpm) the engine my be pulling no vacum, hence whether the TPS is 10% or 100% the engine will still pull in the same amount of air. I still have my MAP hooked up so I can log MAP and figure out what TP is WOT at what rpm if you get what I mean
So the fuel and spark tables are going to be very different using Alpha-N. I am thinking that I might just go back to MAP, drive it to the dyno and then switch to TPS for the tuning. I was hoping to get this pretty close to save dyno time ($$$), but i think it is too risky, because of the spark setting. I might end up with a load of detonation.
FYI - I am going to alpha-n because I have ITBs and MAP signal is not stable enough.
Si