Is this unusual?

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

Wivvix
Fast Driver
Posts: 226
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:30 pm
Vehicle: ND - RF
Location: Perth, WA

Is this unusual?

Postby Wivvix » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:15 pm

Hi guys,

In anticipating some suspension upgrade purchases I decided it would be a good idea to check how my car is sitting at present.

Parked on level concrete in the garage I got four different distances from the ground to the top of the wheel arches.

Front Left: 625mm
Front Right: 615mm
Rear Left: 660mm
Rear Right: 645mm

Is this normal? Is this where/what I should be measuring? :?

User avatar
Hammer
Speed Racer
Posts: 2849
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Is this unusual?

Postby Hammer » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:34 pm

Which car? As in how old and how many k's?

The varying height could be normal wear and tear on the suspension, or it could be abnormal due to a bent chassis.

But its more likely the former.
H@mmer - 1994 Clubman | 2002 SP
Image
GO TOPLESS!!!

Wivvix
Fast Driver
Posts: 226
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:30 pm
Vehicle: ND - RF
Location: Perth, WA

Is this unusual?

Postby Wivvix » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:55 pm

Hammer wrote:Which car? As in how old and how many k's?

The varying height could be normal wear and tear on the suspension, or it could be abnormal due to a bent chassis.

But its more likely the former.


95 NA, 190,000km's. No idea about the age of current suspension kit, def no history of it being replaced in the last 5 years.

rascal
Racing Driver
Posts: 1770
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:39 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: FarSE Melbourne

Is this unusual?

Postby rascal » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:14 am

Wivvix wrote:Is this normal? Is this where/what I should be measuring? :?

Yep, pretty normal for a 190k car.

As Hammer mentioned, all car's springs will eventually sag over time, and usually the drivers side more than passenger as it carries the weight of the driver always, whereas the passenger side only sometimes..

User avatar
Charlie Brown
Speed Racer
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney, Just out of Dragon Territory over the bridge in the "Shire"
Contact:

Is this unusual?

Postby Charlie Brown » Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:51 am

Wivvix wrote:
Is this normal? Is this where/what I should be measuring? :?


Normal measurements are taken from the centre of the wheel (hub) vertically to the underside of the guard lip.

By measuring this way you eliminate uneven tyre pressure and tread wear effecting the measurement at each corner.
Image

Wakefield 1:09.13 Eastern Creek GP 1:50.198 Ext 2:17.538 Sth 1:02.9003
Phillip Is 1:58.50 Winton Short 1:10.7 Lakeside 1:05.7711 MDTC 45.20

93_Clubman
Speed Racer
Posts: 11857
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Melbourne

Is this unusual?

Postby 93_Clubman » Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:08 pm

Also, a few NAs seem to have less clearance on the driver's side rear as yours does.

User avatar
Szemen
Racing Driver
Posts: 553
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:56 pm

Is this unusual?

Postby Szemen » Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:16 pm

My NA8's driver side is wound up higher than the passenger side. ie, its slouched over to the driver side.

Wivvix
Fast Driver
Posts: 226
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:30 pm
Vehicle: ND - RF
Location: Perth, WA

Is this unusual?

Postby Wivvix » Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:44 pm

I took some more measurements as per Charlie Brown's (the normal) methodology :lol:

Front Left: 340mm
Front Right: 345mm
Rear Left: 380mm
Rear Right: 365mm

This is stock suspension by the way. I'm not sure if this is normal ride height, but isn't it a bit odd that there's such a discrepancy between the front and rear height?

93_Clubman
Speed Racer
Posts: 11857
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Melbourne

Is this unusual?

Postby 93_Clubman » Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:05 am

Wivvix, the following text is cut & pasted from:
viewtopic.php?f=30&t=27611

mx5racing wrote:Suspension heights are are calculated via a vertical measurement from the wheel centre to wheel arch.

These measurements are specified by the vehicle manufacturer at the time Aust Compliance is granted. A new vehicle data sheet (NVD1) is issued to the various State/Territory rego authorities. The NA6 NVD1 is known as MAZDA 26 and states the following -

A NA standard is 350 mm front and 370 mm rear. Minimum allowed is 320 mm front and 335 mm rear.

The 100 mm rule is minimum ground clearance for any item (except wheel/tyre).

A lot of aftermarket suspension kits drop the cars lower than minimum spec. .......

Road Vehicle Descriptor (RVD1) sheets replaced NVD1 sheets in 1999. They gave additional information including measurements at full bump and minimum ground clearance (101mm). The last one issued for the NB8B series was RVD1MC-152 issued 20/11/2003.

OVERDRAWN

Is this unusual?

Postby OVERDRAWN » Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:22 pm

My advice is to buy a set of used Bilsteins,readily available,around $450, add some KINGS springs,FCM bump stops and for a modest amount you have a set up that is superior to most.I run KYB AGX's and a mate uses Bilsteins,his is the alround better handler

User avatar
Benny
Speed Racer
Posts: 2607
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Gorgeous Sydney
Contact:

Is this unusual?

Postby Benny » Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:12 pm

A good suspension place can easily re-set your springs, and I would say this is the cheapest and easist way out, and then your car will still be stock.
Also, they can re-set the springs to give you a lower ride height too.
Image
ALWAYS RUNNING, SP with Bilstein Coil Overs and Doof Doof sound. Member of the Fat Bastards Racing Team


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 347 guests