Go clear or not?

Audio, Electronics and Lighting questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

User avatar
madboy
Fast Driver
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:24 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Gold Coast

Go clear or not?

Postby madboy » Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:21 pm

SDC10241.1.jpg


As you can see, I have my front indicators apart because I finally got my arse into gear to shave the lettering off. When I had the lenses clean, I wasn't happy because I could see a layer of crap coating the inside as well, so they got cooked in the oven and pryed apart, cleaned and now...

The question now is, should I leave them apart tonight and source some orange chrome bulbs tomorrow?

cheers
MB
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Uncle Arthur
Dodgy Award Benefactor
Posts: 1802
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Doesn't matter where I'm from-it's that your daughter is with me that's the biggest concern :D
Contact:

Go clear or not?

Postby Uncle Arthur » Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:58 pm

Go clear.
Founder of the QLD Chapter of the Honourable Brothers of Dodgy.

Benefactor of the Perpetual Dodgy award - Inaugural year 2007.

User avatar
Jeo
Speed Racer
Posts: 3648
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:33 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Canberra

Go clear or not?

Postby Jeo » Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:19 pm

Clear

Mr Morlock
Speed Racer
Posts: 6444
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Melbourne

Go clear or not?

Postby Mr Morlock » Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:44 pm

I never get this exercise- you take a perfectly good front turn signal lamp and quite possibly affect its function. The amber bulb has a different base ( by design- 150 deg compared to 180) to the clear bulb so the function ie what it was designed to do is compromised. Removing the certfication numbers achieves nothing at all- aesthetically inconsequential. I reckon a mod has to improve function , or aesthetics and arguably the original appearance is more appropriate. The lense was hotmelted into the housing and leak tested on manufacture and removing it may easily cause a future leaker. The OE hot melt is not procurable so if it does leak you end up with moisture in the lamp or having to use some other sealant which may look unsightly or ineffective. I would put the sub lense back in and hope on reassembly is does not leak. Whilst lamps can generally be taken apart ( except when plastic is welded) they were not intended to be serviced apart from bulb replacement.

User avatar
Craig
Speed Racer
Posts: 6611
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: Non MX-5
Location: Sydney

Go clear or not?

Postby Craig » Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:57 pm

Clear! :wink:
*** Audi Q5 55 Sportback - HYBRID! Zero -100 in 5.3 seconds! 8) ***

User avatar
madboy
Fast Driver
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:24 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Gold Coast

Go clear or not?

Postby madboy » Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:30 pm

Mr Morlock wrote:I never get this exercise- you take a perfectly good front turn signal lamp and quite possibly affect its function. The amber bulb has a different base ( by design- 150 deg compared to 180) to the clear bulb so the function ie what it was designed to do is compromised. Removing the certfication numbers achieves nothing at all- aesthetically inconsequential. I reckon a mod has to improve function , or aesthetics and arguably the original appearance is more appropriate. The lense was hotmelted into the housing and leak tested on manufacture and removing it may easily cause a future leaker. The OE hot melt is not procurable so if it does leak you end up with moisture in the lamp or having to use some other sealant which may look unsightly or ineffective. I would put the sub lense back in and hope on reassembly is does not leak. Whilst lamps can generally be taken apart ( except when plastic is welded) they were not intended to be serviced apart from bulb replacement.



I never get the exercise you put yourself through every time you put an answer in a thread, a big f**king wall of text that I get bored of reading before the end of the 1st line. Did they forget to teach you how to make paragraphs in the 50's? Why? please! why do you put us all through it?

Do you seriously just like insulting peoples intelligence? or is your ignorance blind to you? Did I think about the lense not sealing properly upon reassembly? why yes I do believe if did and decided to do it anyway! Do I believe removing the lettering from a common replacement part which was capturing old polish and dust, also revitalising the entire lense at the same to be aesthetically pleasing, why yes I do! Thats why I did it! I like the way clean and clear lenses sparkle after I have cleaned the car. If you like cloudy lenses and caked up polish, good for you! at least its original!

I am pretty sure the gist of the original question was Clear or Stock, not WHY, how about sticking to that or f**k off.

MB

User avatar
CheyneX5
Racing Driver
Posts: 1776
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:38 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Go clear or not?

Postby CheyneX5 » Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:38 am

Clear!
madboy wrote:
Mr Morlock wrote:I never get this exercise- you take a perfectly good front turn signal lamp and quite possibly affect its function. The amber bulb has a different base ( by design- 150 deg compared to 180) to the clear bulb so the function ie what it was designed to do is compromised. Removing the certfication numbers achieves nothing at all- aesthetically inconsequential. I reckon a mod has to improve function , or aesthetics and arguably the original appearance is more appropriate. The lense was hotmelted into the housing and leak tested on manufacture and removing it may easily cause a future leaker. The OE hot melt is not procurable so if it does leak you end up with moisture in the lamp or having to use some other sealant which may look unsightly or ineffective. I would put the sub lense back in and hope on reassembly is does not leak. Whilst lamps can generally be taken apart ( except when plastic is welded) they were not intended to be serviced apart from bulb replacement.



I never get the exercise you put yourself through every time you put an answer in a thread, a big f**king wall of text that I get bored of reading before the end of the 1st line. Did they forget to teach you how to make paragraphs in the 50's? Why? please! why do you put us all through it?

Do you seriously just like insulting peoples intelligence? or is your ignorance blind to you? Did I think about the lense not sealing properly upon reassembly? why yes I do believe if did and decided to do it anyway! Do I believe removing the lettering from a common replacement part which was capturing old polish and dust, also revitalising the entire lense at the same to be aesthetically pleasing, why yes I do! Thats why I did it! I like the way clean and clear lenses sparkle after I have cleaned the car. If you like cloudy lenses and caked up polish, good for you! at least its original!

I am pretty sure the gist of the original question was Clear or Stock, not WHY, how about sticking to that or f**k off.

MB


A round of applause for MB, Bravo.
90' NA6 - Classic Red
09' Skoda Octavia vRS TSi Wagon - Race Blue

wun911
Speed Racer
Posts: 2114
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:13 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

Go clear or not?

Postby wun911 » Sat Dec 12, 2009 2:14 am

I use clear but I believe the orange pigment weighs more....
every ounce counts

Mr Morlock
Speed Racer
Posts: 6444
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Melbourne

Go clear or not?

Postby Mr Morlock » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:01 am

you ask a question and sometimes the answer does not suit. I imagine that some expect applause for everything they do. If my answers are too long then best not re quote them.

User avatar
madboy
Fast Driver
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:24 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Gold Coast

Go clear or not?

Postby madboy » Sat Dec 12, 2009 11:19 am

Mr Morlock wrote:you ask a question and sometimes the answer does not suit. I imagine that some expect applause for everything they do. If my answers are too long then best not re quote them.


*yawn*

Mr Morlock
Speed Racer
Posts: 6444
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:40 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Melbourne

Go clear or not?

Postby Mr Morlock » Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:01 pm

I do agree with Madboy about para's and he did say that before- I am happy to take that on board. I also confess to having a fault of being to blunt at times and giving offence when that was not the purpose. :oops:

Adam_NAclubman
Racing Driver
Posts: 1418
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:39 pm
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Go clear or not?

Postby Adam_NAclubman » Sun Dec 13, 2009 2:50 am

Mr Morlock wrote:I never get this exercise- you take a perfectly good front turn signal lamp and quite possibly affect its function. The amber bulb has a different base ( by design- 150 deg compared to 180) to the clear bulb so the function ie what it was designed to do is compromised. Removing the certfication numbers achieves nothing at all- aesthetically inconsequential. I reckon a mod has to improve function , or aesthetics and arguably the original appearance is more appropriate. The lense was hotmelted into the housing and leak tested on manufacture and removing it may easily cause a future leaker. The OE hot melt is not procurable so if it does leak you end up with moisture in the lamp or having to use some other sealant which may look unsightly or ineffective. I would put the sub lense back in and hope on reassembly is does not leak. Whilst lamps can generally be taken apart ( except when plastic is welded) they were not intended to be serviced apart from bulb replacement.



I don't know if the OP has a NB or a NA, but when I pulled the amber lenses out of the indicators on my NA8 I didn't have to change the globes, it already had the silver looking globes that flash orange... I don't know if they were original or if a previous owner put them in, but I imagine it would be a waste of time and money to put orange globes in when it still had the lenses. It flashes a very bright orange, so no compromise there, and no leaks either

der baron

Go clear or not?

Postby der baron » Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:06 pm

I would go clear.

however untill i can justify replacing existing ones, i niteshaded mine (black tint)

GP
Racing Driver
Posts: 1025
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:42 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane

Go clear or not?

Postby GP » Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:08 pm

Stock is better :D
Graham

User avatar
Kain
Fast Driver
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:44 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Go clear or not?

Postby Kain » Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:33 pm

Go clear, you know you want to :wink:

On a related note, where are you getting the bulbs? I'm keen to do this too, but I have no idea where to pick up the right bulbs from.


Return to “MX5 Audio, Electronics & Lighting”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 226 guests