How loud are these Philz?
Im really aiming for 'close to stock'. But they do look good.
Are there any ram air intakes out there?
Which intake is best for me?
Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy
- RawSouth
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 10:47 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Which intake is best for me?
ロードスター
- philz
- Wheel guru
- Posts: 1297
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:32 pm
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: Sydney
Which intake is best for me?
SRI- is shown in my previous post, which offer no torque, but a better top end.
Those enclosed intakes will be loud, actually any aftermarket intake will be loud, (but will only be really loud if you punch it at 4k+, under it it's quite livable)
If you just want a subtle/sporty sound, with stock looks.
Swiss cheese air box.
Cost: $0*
*assuming you have a drill and drill bit.
Those enclosed intakes will be loud, actually any aftermarket intake will be loud, (but will only be really loud if you punch it at 4k+, under it it's quite livable)
If you just want a subtle/sporty sound, with stock looks.
Swiss cheese air box.
Cost: $0*
*assuming you have a drill and drill bit.
- StanTheMan
- Forum legend
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Balgowlah
Which intake is best for me?
sliq wrote:StanTheMan wrote:I wouln't call that a CAI.
you can get ones with proper cover & they use the air hole behind the passenger side headlight.
IIRC this one above does increase the torque a bit but sends drivability & fuel economy out the window.
nope, i'm onto my second cold side intake.. it actually decreases the torque. driveability and fuel eco is the same.
thanks for clearing that up.
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:56 am
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Melbourne
Which intake is best for me?
Originally I had a pod attached to the factory piping got it dyno'd and then once I did the 90 degree bend (same as Wazmans) and put the pod on the coldside I got it dyno'd again and came up 7rwkw and 12nm of torque. So i'm not sure if it was the factory intake piping that may have sucked all the performance, but thats what I got, lol.
Cheers
Cheers
Great looking 02 BLACK NB8B, Tein S Tech Coils, Whiteline Adjustable Sways F&R, Carbing Alloy Rear Strut Brace ;)
- madboy
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:24 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Gold Coast
Which intake is best for me?
nice link 16bit
has anyone with a NA used one of these?
http://www.mpsgarage.com.au/shop/product/512/generation-1---90-97-intake--k&n-performance-intake.html
less than $300 and even looks like it would make the pod street legal...would be nice to see a pic of one installed
- bruce
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 7708
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
- Location: Victoria
- Contact:
- sliq
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:33 am
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
- RawSouth
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 10:47 pm
- Vehicle: NB8B
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Which intake is best for me?
It looks like a few companies have made the type of intakes Im looking for in the past.
Such as SMB and IL Motorsport..
But I dont think that either are in production today
Such as SMB and IL Motorsport..
But I dont think that either are in production today
ロードスター
- lukey
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 2:31 pm
- Vehicle: NB SE
- Location: Sydney
Which intake is best for me?
I did one similar to that of Wazman.
I feel it is alot more responsive yet torque has dropped a bit and economy and driveability make no real difference. I had one similar to Szemens and to be h0onest it was a louder version of the factory with no real performance difference (I hope that makes sense)
I feel it is alot more responsive yet torque has dropped a bit and economy and driveability make no real difference. I had one similar to Szemens and to be h0onest it was a louder version of the factory with no real performance difference (I hope that makes sense)
1997 MX5 Montego Blue - Gone
1999 MX5 Brilliant Black - Gone
2004 MX5 SE Titanium - OOOOOHH BABY!!!!
'Jinbai Ittai' - Rider and Horse as one
1999 MX5 Brilliant Black - Gone
2004 MX5 SE Titanium - OOOOOHH BABY!!!!
'Jinbai Ittai' - Rider and Horse as one
- Kain
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:44 pm
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Brisbane, QLD
Which intake is best for me?
Gah, I've just finished my thesis on this business, and now a thread pops up to haunt me
Just to add in my little bit to whether that 'shorty' intake that Philz posted actually adds or removes torque (sorry if there's too much engineer-speak):
The performance benefits of an intake manifold are not solely dependant on the temperature of the air it feeds to the engine. Every intake has a 'natural frequency'. Every time an intake valve opens, it causes a pressure wave to go though the intake. If the frequency of that pressure wave due to the intake valves matches the natural frequency of the intake, basically what happens is the resonance shoves more air into the cylinder than usual. So you get a performance gain at that certain RPM.
The effect of all this is this -> the shorter the intake 'tract' (from the intake vales to the pod filter/end of stock intake), the higher the natural frequency, so the higher the rpm must be to match it. The opposite holds true for the longer intake tract, it favours low rpm. So when you dyno your short intake and get a power increase, its improved your top end at the compromise of your bottom end.
Of course, this is just one of several factors that dictate the performance gain from your intake.
TL;DR - Short intake for top end power, long intake for low end torque.
Just to add in my little bit to whether that 'shorty' intake that Philz posted actually adds or removes torque (sorry if there's too much engineer-speak):
The performance benefits of an intake manifold are not solely dependant on the temperature of the air it feeds to the engine. Every intake has a 'natural frequency'. Every time an intake valve opens, it causes a pressure wave to go though the intake. If the frequency of that pressure wave due to the intake valves matches the natural frequency of the intake, basically what happens is the resonance shoves more air into the cylinder than usual. So you get a performance gain at that certain RPM.
The effect of all this is this -> the shorter the intake 'tract' (from the intake vales to the pod filter/end of stock intake), the higher the natural frequency, so the higher the rpm must be to match it. The opposite holds true for the longer intake tract, it favours low rpm. So when you dyno your short intake and get a power increase, its improved your top end at the compromise of your bottom end.
Of course, this is just one of several factors that dictate the performance gain from your intake.
TL;DR - Short intake for top end power, long intake for low end torque.
-
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:03 am
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: Melbourne
Which intake is best for me?
StanTheMan wrote:sliq wrote:StanTheMan wrote:I wouln't call that a CAI.
you can get ones with proper cover & they use the air hole behind the passenger side headlight.
IIRC this one above does increase the torque a bit but sends drivability & fuel economy out the window.
nope, i'm onto my second cold side intake.. it actually decreases the torque. driveability and fuel eco is the same.
thanks for clearing that up.
i have one, but i made it out of stainless steel, less torque, more top end, i think theres a slight fuel consumption issue, im gonna put the factory crap back on n see if it makes a difference
get busy living or get busy dying
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 2057
- Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:05 pm
- Vehicle: NB SP
- Location: Brisbane
Which intake is best for me?
I had one of the Good Win Racing Monster Flow CAI's on my NB8A, which I then sold to Boags who used it on his NB8B...
http://www.good-win-racing.com/Mazda-Pe ... 001NB.html
Work very well, sound great when you've got the foot flat to the boards, but not an obtrusive or offensive sound when driving "normally". Definitely an improvement in throttle response and torque. Fair chance that power would have improved to some extent also. If you get one of these, make sure you get the optional coolbox too.
http://www.good-win-racing.com/Mazda-Pe ... 001NB.html
Work very well, sound great when you've got the foot flat to the boards, but not an obtrusive or offensive sound when driving "normally". Definitely an improvement in throttle response and torque. Fair chance that power would have improved to some extent also. If you get one of these, make sure you get the optional coolbox too.
Pain is temporary, quitting lasts forever.
Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests