Which intake is best for me?

Engines, Transmissions & Final Drive questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy

User avatar
RawSouth
Fast Driver
Posts: 475
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 10:47 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Which intake is best for me?

Postby RawSouth » Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:51 pm

How loud are these Philz?

Im really aiming for 'close to stock'. But they do look good.

Are there any ram air intakes out there?
ロードスター

User avatar
philz
Wheel guru
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:32 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Sydney

Which intake is best for me?

Postby philz » Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:58 pm

SRI- is shown in my previous post, which offer no torque, but a better top end.

Those enclosed intakes will be loud, actually any aftermarket intake will be loud, (but will only be really loud if you punch it at 4k+, under it it's quite livable)

If you just want a subtle/sporty sound, with stock looks.

Swiss cheese air box.

Image

Cost: $0*

*assuming you have a drill and drill bit.

User avatar
StanTheMan
Forum legend
Posts: 6824
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Balgowlah

Which intake is best for me?

Postby StanTheMan » Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:30 pm

sliq wrote:
StanTheMan wrote:I wouln't call that a CAI.

you can get ones with proper cover & they use the air hole behind the passenger side headlight.

IIRC this one above does increase the torque a bit but sends drivability & fuel economy out the window.


nope, i'm onto my second cold side intake.. it actually decreases the torque. driveability and fuel eco is the same.


thanks for clearing that up. :oops:
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6

matt9111
Fast Driver
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:56 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Melbourne

Which intake is best for me?

Postby matt9111 » Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:24 pm

Originally I had a pod attached to the factory piping got it dyno'd and then once I did the 90 degree bend (same as Wazmans) and put the pod on the coldside I got it dyno'd again and came up 7rwkw and 12nm of torque. So i'm not sure if it was the factory intake piping that may have sucked all the performance, but thats what I got, lol.

Cheers
Great looking 02 BLACK NB8B, Tein S Tech Coils, Whiteline Adjustable Sways F&R, Carbing Alloy Rear Strut Brace ;)

User avatar
madboy
Fast Driver
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:24 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Gold Coast

Which intake is best for me?

Postby madboy » Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:33 pm



nice link 16bit

has anyone with a NA used one of these?

http://www.mpsgarage.com.au/shop/product/512/generation-1---90-97-intake--k&n-performance-intake.html

less than $300 and even looks like it would make the pod street legal...would be nice to see a pic of one installed

User avatar
bruce
Speed Racer
Posts: 7708
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Which intake is best for me?

Postby bruce » Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:41 pm

Still not enclosed, so not legal.

User avatar
sliq
Speed Racer
Posts: 3414
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:33 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Which intake is best for me?

Postby sliq » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:55 pm

regie has the ddm works one.
i can't brain today.. i have the dumb..

User avatar
RawSouth
Fast Driver
Posts: 475
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 10:47 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Which intake is best for me?

Postby RawSouth » Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:47 am

It looks like a few companies have made the type of intakes Im looking for in the past.

Such as SMB and IL Motorsport..

Image Image

But I dont think that either are in production today
ロードスター

User avatar
lukey
Fast Driver
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 2:31 pm
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Sydney

Which intake is best for me?

Postby lukey » Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:28 am

I did one similar to that of Wazman.
I feel it is alot more responsive yet torque has dropped a bit and economy and driveability make no real difference. I had one similar to Szemens and to be h0onest it was a louder version of the factory with no real performance difference (I hope that makes sense)
1997 MX5 Montego Blue - Gone
1999 MX5 Brilliant Black - Gone
2004 MX5 SE Titanium - OOOOOHH BABY!!!!
'Jinbai Ittai' - Rider and Horse as one

User avatar
Kain
Fast Driver
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:44 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Which intake is best for me?

Postby Kain » Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:42 pm

Gah, I've just finished my thesis on this business, and now a thread pops up to haunt me :roll:

Just to add in my little bit to whether that 'shorty' intake that Philz posted actually adds or removes torque (sorry if there's too much engineer-speak):

The performance benefits of an intake manifold are not solely dependant on the temperature of the air it feeds to the engine. Every intake has a 'natural frequency'. Every time an intake valve opens, it causes a pressure wave to go though the intake. If the frequency of that pressure wave due to the intake valves matches the natural frequency of the intake, basically what happens is the resonance shoves more air into the cylinder than usual. So you get a performance gain at that certain RPM.

The effect of all this is this -> the shorter the intake 'tract' (from the intake vales to the pod filter/end of stock intake), the higher the natural frequency, so the higher the rpm must be to match it. The opposite holds true for the longer intake tract, it favours low rpm. So when you dyno your short intake and get a power increase, its improved your top end at the compromise of your bottom end.

Of course, this is just one of several factors that dictate the performance gain from your intake.

TL;DR - Short intake for top end power, long intake for low end torque.

dorifta
Fast Driver
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:03 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

Which intake is best for me?

Postby dorifta » Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:50 pm

StanTheMan wrote:
sliq wrote:
StanTheMan wrote:I wouln't call that a CAI.

you can get ones with proper cover & they use the air hole behind the passenger side headlight.

IIRC this one above does increase the torque a bit but sends drivability & fuel economy out the window.


nope, i'm onto my second cold side intake.. it actually decreases the torque. driveability and fuel eco is the same.


thanks for clearing that up. :oops:



i have one, but i made it out of stainless steel, less torque, more top end, i think theres a slight fuel consumption issue, im gonna put the factory crap back on n see if it makes a difference
get busy living or get busy dying

NMX516
Speed Racer
Posts: 2057
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:05 pm
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Brisbane

Which intake is best for me?

Postby NMX516 » Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:24 pm

I had one of the Good Win Racing Monster Flow CAI's on my NB8A, which I then sold to Boags who used it on his NB8B...

http://www.good-win-racing.com/Mazda-Pe ... 001NB.html

Work very well, sound great when you've got the foot flat to the boards, but not an obtrusive or offensive sound when driving "normally". Definitely an improvement in throttle response and torque. Fair chance that power would have improved to some extent also. If you get one of these, make sure you get the optional coolbox too.
Pain is temporary, quitting lasts forever.


Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests