The official slammed thread

RG.net · Postby **RG.net** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:58 pm

There seems to be some confusion within the lowered/slammed thread. So it's a good idea to seperate the two.

This thread isn't for the fient hearted, if you dont know what "slammed" is, then chances are that your car doesnt belong here.

Examples of slammed are as follows.

Let the games begin.

sliq · Postby **sliq** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:58 pm

i think this thread will be cut short... barely any aus spec mx5's are slammed

RG.net · Postby **RG.net** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:10 pm

sliq wrote:i think this thread will be cut short... barely any aus spec mx5's are slammed

So do i, but it avoids the confusion in the lowered thread.

zawrilla · Postby **zawrilla** » Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:00 pm

Really don't see a point to this thread.
No point separating the two. If your car is slammed and you're proud of it put it in the other thread and in your own car diary.
If you want to see really slammed MX5s, then check out the mx5 picture thread on jdmst.

RG.net · Postby **RG.net** » Mon Aug 17, 2009 12:16 am

the point is to avoid everyone in the "lowered/slammed thread" to reject themselves from uploading pictures of their cars, due to the fact that they dont think its slammed.

This is an MX5 forum, members shouldnt need to log into another forum to view and post pictures of mx5's.

and, majority of the cars in the JDMST thread are actually miatas, it would be nice to see some local, Australian MX5's.

funnily enough, if no one got all confused in the lowered thread, this thread wouldnt exist.

rjastra2 · Postby **rjastra2** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:51 am

LOL... look at the little pram wheels on that thing

That looks Oz spec to me.

JBT · Postby **JBT** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:34 am

zawrilla wrote:Really don't see a point to this thread.

bensale · Postby **bensale** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:46 am

The official slammed thread

The anti slam, mx4x4 :mrgreen:

philz · Postby **philz** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:03 pm

rjastra2 wrote:
LOL... look at the little pram wheels on that thing

That looks Oz spec to me.

ƒü¢k that car looks ugly, too high, close that wheel gap son!

Yes this thread is pointless.

RG.net · Postby **RG.net** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:40 pm

not my fault people cant read now is it :roll:

CheyneX5 · Postby **CheyneX5** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:45 pm

How about an mx4x4 thread then ben? :mrgreen:

Most people will look at a slammed mx5 and just say, wow... thats a really low mx5. Hence why it shall fall under the category "lowered"

RG.net · Postby **RG.net** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:12 pm

*sigh*

CoffeeBoss wrote:
sliq wrote:i wanna see some lowered NC's!! where the fudge are they?!

There aren't all that many NC's in OZ on height adjustables atm. And i don't really consider mine low enough to be considered for this thread. Which isn't going to change in the near future. Eventually though...

MXHEVN wrote:No excuses! its the lowered/slammed thread, if it isnt stock height then it belongs in here.

RG.net · Postby **RG.net** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:14 pm

matt9111 wrote:Woah cars look awsome....

So am I posting pics of my car up because its lowered by 25mm in the front and 35mm in the rear?

I wouldn't call it slammed lol...

But one day lol...

MXHEVN wrote:this thread is for the lowered and slammed MX-5's on this forum.

If its not stock height, it belongs in here.

RG.net · Postby **RG.net** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:14 pm

an example of confusion

Wivvix wrote:
matt9111 wrote:Lol, well here it is.....

looks so high compared to everyone else's, lol

Well it is the "slammed" thread.

PS if you think that's high.... you don't want to see mine...

RG.net · Postby **RG.net** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:16 pm

and another.

Charlie Brown wrote:
sliq wrote:i wanna see some lowered NC's!! where the fudge are they?!

Does this count as slammed? Down 40mm front & rear.

now, hopefully you can see why this thread was made, as pointless as it is, it keeps all the confusion out of the other thread.

why do i bother though, its not like i'm a moderator or anything :roll: