Are TEIN Flex Actually Illegal on the MX-5?

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

Are TIEN Flex actually illegal for road use on the MX-5 (only answer if you KNOW for sure)

Yes (and I know what I am talking about)
3
7%
No (only some makes/models are on other cars)
3
7%
I don't know, but i would like to find out!
37
86%
 
Total votes: 43

User avatar
orx626
Forum sponsor
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 8:26 am
Vehicle: NC - Rotary
Location: Brisbane - Northside
Contact:

Postby orx626 » Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:42 pm

No

There are no ADR's for shock absorbers or car suspension, only ride height. The car may not meet the ADR's if ride height is lowered excessively.

All states have agreed to implement the NCOP (National Code of Practice) for light vehicle modifications. The following link contains all requirements for the LS Code - Tyres, Rims, Suspension and Steering.

http://www.dotars.gov.au/transport/safety/road/bulletin/pdf/NCOP11_Section_LS_Suspension_and_steering_3Feb2006.pdf - link fixed!

Tein Flex shock absorbers are manufactured for MX5's. MX5 Plus are importing a set for my car.

The car may not meet the LS Code requirements if they are adjusted so that the suspension movement is reduced by more than one third.

I would also like to know where in legislation/code of practice that having an adjustable shock tube length is not compliant/illegal!!! Maybe it's a local marketing ploy to deter people from importing directly from Tein dealers in Japan?

I hope this assists you with your decision making.

Regards,
Danny
Last edited by orx626 on Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Rival

Re:

Postby Rival » Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:44 am

orx626 wrote:No

There are no ADR's for shock absorbers or car suspension, only ride height. The car may not meet the ADR's if ride height is lowered excessively.

All states have agreed to implement the NCOP (National Code of Practice) for light vehicle modifications. The following link contains all requirements for the LS Code - Tyres, Rims, Suspension and Steering.
[url]http://www.dotars.gov.au/transport/safety/road/bulletin/pdf/NCOP11_Section_LS_Suspension_and_steering_3Feb2006.pdf
[/url]

Tein Flex shock absorbers are manufactured for MX5's. MX5 Plus are importing a set for my car.

The car may not meet the LS Code requirements if they are adjusted so that the suspension movement is reduced by more than one third.

I would also like to know where in legislation/code of practice that having an adjustable shock tube length is not compliant/illegal!!! Maybe it's a local marketing ploy to deter people from importing directly from Tein dealers in Japan?

I hope this assists you with your decision making.

Regards,
Danny


Best reply yet!, this is what i am talking about, there nothing concrete i have actualy read that specifically states these are illegal, just the odd forum post with some online expert giving their 2c.

Cheers!

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Postby JBT » Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:35 am

Finally got the answer you wanted.
Image

User avatar
16bit
Speed Racer
Posts: 2346
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:51 pm
Vehicle: NB8A - Supercharged
Location: Brisbane Southside

Postby 16bit » Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:08 am

get super street ones then - would they be legal?

Rival

Re:

Postby Rival » Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:25 am

JBT wrote:Finally got the answer you wanted.


didn't care if the answer was for or against their legality, just something more concrete than something that was heard in conversation that might be true or might not.

realistically the MX is my partners daily driver so Flex is probably too firm for her anyway. i just NEEDED to know... probably because i am an engineer and i hate not being sure about something.

User avatar
AJ
Speed Racer
Posts: 4349
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 8:27 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Gold Coast

Postby AJ » Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:16 pm

aaaaaah......engineers......so anal retentive, they need to know the structure & validity of a sandwich before they eat it :lol: :lol: :lol:



they also send more dirty jokes across the internet than any other group :mrgreen:
Image
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often
XMX5 Rogues

User avatar
Okibi
Speed Racer
Posts: 10901
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

Postby Okibi » Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:59 pm

I have tein flex on our NB8A, it's got W.A. permits so 100% legal (as long as I keep the height it was measured at having then I got the permits which met ADRs).

There's no way i'd lower it anymore than that anyway.
If you had access to a car like this, would you take it back right away? Neither would I.

User avatar
ZenArcher
Fast Driver
Posts: 170
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:40 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Nowra
Contact:

Postby ZenArcher » Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:49 pm

Well, after first hand experience this morning with the wonderful people at Dickson (ACT, Canberra) Motor Registry, the Teins are legal in the ACT.

to relate the story, a while back I converted my NA6 and had Mania install a 1.8 into her. Well, being a law abiding person and finally being in the country for more than a week (being a coach at the AIS has me travelling all over the place) I thought I would do the right thing and have the engine inspected and number changed for registration purposes.

Well, off to the DMT and no problem with the engine, but problem with the ride height, 10mm too low. So, after much phoning and advice from various workshops, I ended up having Mania install a full set of Teins.

To re-interate what everyone else has said... :D :D worth every cent.

Passed the inspection this morning so now have a fully legal MX5. Though I was surprised that they said nothing about my style bars. But that may have had something to do with me wearing a suit this morning. Last time I just wore my usual AIS coaching attire - jeans, AIS Coaches shirt and track shoes. They treated me like some young punk who was trying to pull one over them. Though my problem is that I look much younger than my age. I'm actually 40, but look 25. A friend who is in the AFP and suggested I wear my work suit so I did and I got a totally different reaction. All smiles and politeness from the same people who treated me like crap only 1.5 weeks ago.

Ahh well, at least my MX is now legal again. :D

User avatar
Okibi
Speed Racer
Posts: 10901
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

Postby Okibi » Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:54 pm

congrats, better to keep everything legal if you ever have to make an insurance claim.
If you had access to a car like this, would you take it back right away? Neither would I.

Muzdaman
Fast Driver
Posts: 453
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:00 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle

Postby Muzdaman » Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:33 pm

Bump.

I was looking for this thread and thought others that missed it might be interested.

bark
Fast Driver
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:44 pm
Vehicle: NA6 - Turbo
Location: Adelaide

Are TEIN Flex Actually Illegal on the MX-5?

Postby bark » Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:00 pm

As I'm going through the process of getting all of my bits approved by Regency and then subsequently by NSW Road Authorities I have dug up this old (but great) thread.

Just wondering if anyone else has had their tein flex passed by road authorities since this post was last active??

User avatar
corners
Racing Driver
Posts: 1127
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:33 pm
Vehicle: ND - Supercharged
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Are TEIN Flex Actually Illegal on the MX-5?

Postby corners » Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:57 pm

Bumping an old but useful thread!
Steampunk wrote: Oh you've got Ohlins? You must like drugs too!!!

bretauto
Driver
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:23 pm
Vehicle: NB8A - Turbo
Location: Sydney, Wetherill Park

Are TEIN Flex Actually Illegal on the MX-5?

Postby bretauto » Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:40 pm

Just had my car engineered for the welded in half cage , engineer said there was no issuse with coil overs and a report is is not required as long as they meet the required suspension heights , and the mounting position and load bearing position had not be altered, and of cause it had to be a quailty unit. he wrote them in to the report for me as well as the sparco seats on OEM runners,[no report required as well]. This just makes it easy if I have any problems with any less informed people or if the rules change. It was a minium charge for the report on the cage and no extra cost for the other items to be mentioned.
Brett

User avatar
DanielB
Driver
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:58 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Sydney

Are TEIN Flex Actually Illegal on the MX-5?

Postby DanielB » Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:53 pm

Just slightly off topic, but Brett did the sparcos mount straight up to the standard rails using the standard mounting holes in the base of the seat?


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 365 guests