Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

User avatar
green_comet
Car Detailing Guru
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 1:41 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Melbourne

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby green_comet » Tue Feb 03, 2009 5:33 pm

wun911 wrote:Please note "squeal like a pig" is a saying when used in this context it refers to a loud shrill, cry or the sound a pig makes.
It does not refer to the noise a person makes while being sodomized by a backwoods redneck pig farmer.
Please do not confuse with other slang definitions; to turn informer; betray an accomplice; reveal a secret; or as someone acting as an informer or decoy for a pig.

Example to the seccond reference here: http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=yj4LnfkdJDM


:lol:

I made sure when I got my RE001's that they were made in Japan. They have plenty of grip, and perform very well. Ill see in the coming months if they start to fall apart like the ones in the pics. I think you guys should complain about the Australian made ones..

User avatar
hks_kansei
Speed Racer
Posts: 6154
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Victoria

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby hks_kansei » Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:25 pm

I spoke with Tien the other night regarding the RE001.

I have a set of Japanese made RE001 in 195/50/15 and have not had any issues.

I've done one trackday on them and one motorkhana, and the guy I bought the tyres off had done a few trackdays with them too, no chunks missing, no warped tread, not any damage, And I would expect my fat car (1300kg) to be much harder on tyres than an MX5 would!

here's what my RE001 look like
Image Image Image

track pressures were 36psi hot all round
motorkhana was 36psi cold front, 45psi cold rear.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)

User avatar
TieNN89
Speed Racer
Posts: 2012
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:27 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby TieNN89 » Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:24 pm

ono its HKS

User avatar
cshaks
Fast Driver
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:44 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2
Location: melbourne

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby cshaks » Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:38 pm

Charlie, I just swapped two of my PP2 (15 inch) for the Jap spec adrenaline. I am stil running 2 x PP2 on the back until they wear down, (shouldn't be long) but I have to say I am converted.
The Adrenalines seem like they have a greater grip level, and also feel like they are a more comfortable ride, perhaps as I don't have to use quite as high a pressure in them due to the stiffer sidewall.
I haven't tracked the car since I swapped tyres, but on a couple of spirited runs they feel liek they are a whole generation better than the PP2.
I got mine for about $140 a tyre fitted and balanced.
Tyres were fitted about 2 weeks before I got a chance to get a custom wheel alignment done, so the only change in the car was the tyres.


(BTW thanks for the great info you posted on wheel alignments!)

Cheers
Chris
SOLD: '95 NA8 White with custom tan leather. BD bar, King Springs, 15" NB alloys.
Now driving a Mazda6 luxury sports.

User avatar
Charlie Brown
Speed Racer
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney, Just out of Dragon Territory over the bridge in the "Shire"
Contact:

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby Charlie Brown » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:31 am

Just had some prices.

PP2 215x45x17 $305 :twisted:

RE001 215x45x17 $183 8)
RE001 225x45x17 $227

and

RE001 205x45x17 (std NC size) $337 :shock:
Image

Wakefield 1:09.13 Eastern Creek GP 1:50.198 Ext 2:17.538 Sth 1:02.9003
Phillip Is 1:58.50 Winton Short 1:10.7 Lakeside 1:05.7711 MDTC 45.20

User avatar
cshaks
Fast Driver
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:44 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2
Location: melbourne

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby cshaks » Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:46 pm

I just remembered that I had a good chat with the manager down at my local bridgestone before I bought the tyres. He firmly recommended that I go with the Jap spec tyre over the Aus spec for a few reasons.
1 : Slightly softer compund rubber
2 : Jap spec apparently has another 1 or 2 mm of tread depth when compared to the Aus spec.
3: Although he did not say it outright he intimated that the Jap tyre was of a better build quality.

Cheers
SOLD: '95 NA8 White with custom tan leather. BD bar, King Springs, 15" NB alloys.
Now driving a Mazda6 luxury sports.

User avatar
marcusus
Speed Racer
Posts: 2919
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:07 am
Vehicle: NB8A

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby marcusus » Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:05 pm

cshaks wrote:I just remembered that I had a good chat with the manager down at my local bridgestone before I bought the tyres. He firmly recommended that I go with the Jap spec tyre over the Aus spec for a few reasons.

I'm surprised he gave you the option. I'm talking good surprise though.

NMX516 wrote:For those interested... :| This is the most flattering photo I've taken of them.
Image

I've noticed this happening on my Aus spec adrenalins now. I swapped them off after the last track meet and noticed the same chunking.

As a refresher, I pretty much use these tyres only for the track at the moment (with maybe 1-2 weeks road driving afterwards) whilst I try and wear out my rubber on my spare rims before I get some sort of semi.

I still haven't noticed the grip problem, but I'm comparing my bridgestones to my old Kuhmo Ecsta's, so perhaps it's not as good a gauge as comparing Aus spec to Jap spec. Either way, I'm still convinced the Aus specs work well enough.

User avatar
marcusus
Speed Racer
Posts: 2919
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:07 am
Vehicle: NB8A

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby marcusus » Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:05 pm

cshaks wrote:I just remembered that I had a good chat with the manager down at my local bridgestone before I bought the tyres. He firmly recommended that I go with the Jap spec tyre over the Aus spec for a few reasons.

I'm surprised he gave you the option. I'm talking good surprise though.

NMX516 wrote:For those interested... :| This is the most flattering photo I've taken of them.
Image

I've noticed this happening on my Aus spec adrenalins now. I swapped them off after the last track meet and noticed the same chunking.

As a refresher, I pretty much use these tyres only for the track at the moment (with maybe 1-2 weeks road driving afterwards) whilst I try and wear out my rubber on my spare rims before I get some sort of semi.

I still haven't noticed the grip problem, but I'm comparing my bridgestones to my old Kuhmo Ecsta's, so perhaps it's not as good a gauge as comparing Aus spec to Jap spec. Either way, I'm still convinced the Aus specs work well enough.

User avatar
hot rod
Fast Driver
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:47 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby hot rod » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:26 am

cshaks wrote:I just remembered that I had a good chat with the manager down at my local bridgestone before I bought the tyres. He firmly recommended that I go with the Jap spec tyre over the Aus spec for a few reasons.
1 : Slightly softer compund rubber
2 : Jap spec apparently has another 1 or 2 mm of tread depth when compared to the Aus spec.
3: Although he did not say it outright he intimated that the Jap tyre was of a better build quality.

Cheers


That's interesting.

I have 2 sets of 16in RE001's at home, I didn't realise they may be different until now. One set is Aussie spec and one set made in Japan. The only difference being the Aussie tyres have colouring chalk lines on the thread. I measured the tread and they are similar as far as I can see (JDM ones look to be 0.5mm more in in the middle). No idea regarding compounds though.

Nark

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby Nark » Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:35 pm

Charlie Brown wrote:Bridgestone RE001 - $252 - mixed information from other forums on this tyre. Some say it's the antz pantz, others say its noisy but most would buy it again. It's locally made and some think that's a negative.

Bridgestone RE050A - $333 - a bit to exxxy for me.
I know you only want to hear about MX-5 experiences but I thought I'd throw this out there anyway.

Most of the Libertys come with RE050As in 215/45R17 so I'm pretty well versed on this tyre. The guys that have gone to the RE001s state that they're softer riding and almost as grippy. The main difference is the sidewall though. The RE050As have fantasticly firm sidewalls which put them high above the RE001s in terms of feedback and turn in.

Whether they're worth the extra spend depends on what you like in your tyre.

SPy vs. SPy
Racing Driver
Posts: 902
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 7:40 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2
Location: In a fast car, so not an NC.

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby SPy vs. SPy » Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:37 pm

As NMX516/8 has finally used "The Force" and come over to Team SP, I have had NMX518 in my hands for two days. (that sounds wrong in a 99MXV kind of way) That being said I doubt I'll ever get the keys to NMX516 :mrgreen:

Anyway, whilst returning from the land of BrisVegas last night, I happened upon a very (very very) wet stretch of road. Apart from the fact MX516/8 had made it quite clear not to bend NMX518, especially on a bit of road I have dríven 7 trazillion miles on, I was left far from impressed with the RE001's, quite clearly they were letting it be well known they wanted to kill me.

I had also checked the RE001's before leaving BrisVegas, and had a very good idea of how much tread depth there was. I have recently replaced my dead PP2's with a brand new set, and after last night I feel extremely vindicated with my decision.

Today I drove NMX518 back into BrisVegas and, although nowhere near as noisy as a set of Dunlop FM-901's (sniff, yep they're an historic tyre now, but flowering awesome), not a pinch on how quiet a set of PP2's are.

PP2's FTW

Oh, and I got 40K out of the PP2's too
Went for a drive and there were slow cars everywhere, why are NC's so common . . . must be NC = Normally Cardiganed.

User avatar
Garry
Speed Racer
Posts: 3481
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: God's Country
Contact:

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby Garry » Fri Feb 13, 2009 8:49 am

Oh, and I got 40K out of the PP2's too


How the hell did you manage that???? I'll be lucky to get 30k km out of this set, thats going to be about 5K km better than the last set. I'm seem to average about 25K out of a set of tyres. The poxy stock Turanzas only lasted 20k km though. :shock:
Shiney black one with added red bits. Member of the fart club. Now with extra doof and Sunlong. - deceased and gone to heaven

User avatar
Caffeine
Racing Driver
Posts: 1806
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Sydney

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby Caffeine » Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:01 am

Garry wrote:
Oh, and I got 40K out of the PP2's too


How the hell did you manage that???? I'll be lucky to get 30k km out of this set, thats going to be about 5K km better than the last set. I'm seem to average about 25K out of a set of tyres. The poxy stock Turanzas only lasted 20k km though. :shock:


Wow, I managed 25k out of both sets of turanzas, plus a dozen or so track days. The A539's lasted 65K and the two sets of CDrives lasted nearly 50k each.

In comparison I expect the RE001's to last less than 30k (they're on 20ish now)
Image
Supreme Blue NB8B, 1:16.98 at Wakefield when stock, but it's not stock any more...

User avatar
AJ
Speed Racer
Posts: 4349
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 8:27 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Gold Coast

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby AJ » Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:03 pm

Garry wrote:
Oh, and I got 40K out of the PP2's too


How the hell did you manage that???? I'll be lucky to get 30k km out of this set, thats going to be about 5K km better than the last set. I'm seem to average about 25K out of a set of tyres. The poxy stock Turanzas only lasted 20k km though. :shock:


currently sitting on 33k on my PP1's..........the outside edges are looking a bit daggy after 3 trackdays, but there's plenty of life left in them yet :wink: :mrgreen:
Image
Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often
XMX5 Rogues

User avatar
ASE05
Racing Driver
Posts: 741
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 11:35 pm
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Not from 'round these parts...
Contact:

Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001 vs PP2 vs rest?

Postby ASE05 » Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:28 pm

We had the PP2s fitted @ 36000km, now got 41000km on the clock and there's at least another two track days in 'em! I should be able to beat my previous best of 13000km with the PP2s and have 'em dead with under 10000km :oops: Great tyres though! A fair bit better than the OEM Toyos were and way better than the RT615s!

TheMissus had Re001s fitted to the NA the other day and I gotta say, I like 'em! (185/60/14 - Aussie, no Jap ones apparently)
Sing that song, puff all night long.......


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests