BUILDING CAI materials.

Engines, Transmissions & Final Drive questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel

User avatar
Okibi
Speed Racer
Posts: 10906
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby Okibi » Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:29 pm

grump wrote:A pod filter is illegal..


In W.A. you can get a permit to mount a pod filter. They just check and make sure it's all attached securely.
If you had access to a car like this, would you take it back right away? Neither would I.

stevesports
Racing Driver
Posts: 740
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:02 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby stevesports » Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:03 pm

grump wrote:A pod filter is illegal, I'm not sure but I think that if your air intake is outside the engine bay it is alright. the reason a pod filter is illegal is because if your car should backfire through the filter it could cause an fire in the engine bay. I think the modern filter boxes probably have some sort of baffle system built into them to stop any such occurence. I think this baffle system could be the restriction that makes a pod filter more effective. just a thought.


not quite. A pod filter is illegal if it not enclosed in a airbox.

in addition, how would a car backfire through the intake tract? the ignition occurs when the valves on the intake side of the engine is closed so i don't understand how this would occur. In addition, if this would occur, the paper filter would catch fire anyway.

User avatar
crzymx
Fast Driver
Posts: 414
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:43 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby crzymx » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:53 am

What constitues as an airbox? Enclosed casing, i.e enclosed pod filter in a mani CAI system?
DIY is the new black!

grump
Fast Driver
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:33 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane bayside

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby grump » Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:09 am

the mania pod filter is enclosed in an airbox with a tube off the intake side which goes through the firewall. My old ski boat motor, 350 chev, used to backfire through the carb all the time.
You had to hit the starter to suck the flames back into the carb to put the fire out. scarry to the uninitiated, but you got used to it.
Bond, James Bond. growing old is not an option, growing up is

stevesports
Racing Driver
Posts: 740
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:02 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby stevesports » Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:02 am

grump wrote:the mania pod filter is enclosed in an airbox with a tube off the intake side which goes through the firewall. My old ski boat motor, 350 chev, used to backfire through the carb all the time.
You had to hit the starter to suck the flames back into the carb to put the fire out. scarry to the uninitiated, but you got used to it.


that is hardcore. What do you think causes that?

User avatar
Matty
Racing Driver
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby Matty » Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:17 am


GP
Racing Driver
Posts: 1025
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:42 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby GP » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:21 pm

I didn't bother with the hole thru the firewall, Not very much advantage in doing that. I did it remove the airbox restriction which Improved performance/fuel economy.
Graham

User avatar
Jeo
Speed Racer
Posts: 3655
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:33 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Canberra

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby Jeo » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:59 pm

grump wrote:A pod filter is illegal.


Legal in the ACT

grump
Fast Driver
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:33 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane bayside

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby grump » Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:39 pm

stevesports, the 350 chev was built by Billy Man here in Brisbane, was putting out 500 plus horsepower. It didn't like to idle due to cams etc. 0 to 60mph in under 4 seconds. I guess the timing wasn't set to the optimum for idle. so with no gearbox and a dog clutch when you dropped the revs to put it in drive the extra load would cause it to backfire and stall. If you kept the revs up a bit and forced it in and then put your foot down it wasn't a problem. I must add that I didn't have any air filter or air cleaner on the engine
Bond, James Bond. growing old is not an option, growing up is

User avatar
crzymx
Fast Driver
Posts: 414
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:43 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby crzymx » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:30 pm

GP wrote:I didn't bother with the hole thru the firewall, Not very much advantage in doing that. I did it remove the airbox restriction which Improved performance/fuel economy.


Are you suggesting that the CAI is not neccessary?
DIY is the new black!

User avatar
crzymx
Fast Driver
Posts: 414
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:43 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Melbourne

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby crzymx » Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:46 pm

Whats your opinion on making one as apposed to buying one?
DIY is the new black!

GP
Racing Driver
Posts: 1025
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:42 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby GP » Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:06 pm

Are you suggesting that the CAI is not neccessary?

I'm just saying that drawing air from in front of the windscreen gives little to no Improvement over just drawing air from under the bonnet.
I am planning on ducting air from the front of the car one day.
The abreviation CAI I find optimistic, I prefer AAI (Ambient Air Intake) :D
Graham

User avatar
Matty
Racing Driver
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby Matty » Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:25 pm

GP wrote:
Are you suggesting that the CAI is not neccessary?

I'm just saying that drawing air from in front of the windscreen gives little to no Improvement over just drawing air from under the bonnet.
I am planning on ducting air from the front of the car one day.
The abreviation CAI I find optimistic, I prefer AAI (Ambient Air Intake) :D

Have you actually measured the intake temperatures? I have, there's a big difference using a cowl intake.

grump
Fast Driver
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:33 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane bayside

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby grump » Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:12 pm

GP i'm sure if you go back through the posts you will find evidence that proves that a cowel intake makes a noticible difference. It won't make any difference where you pick up your air from under the bonnet, it will be hotter than the air outside your bonnet. the gap between the bonnet and screen is a high pressure area , so it is a good place to pick up your air from.
My mx5 mania cai makes a noticable difference. It replaces a standard K+N pod filter picking up from under the bonnet.
Bond, James Bond. growing old is not an option, growing up is

GP
Racing Driver
Posts: 1025
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:42 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane

BUILDING CAI materials.

Postby GP » Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:49 am

GP i'm sure if you go back through the posts you will find evidence that proves that a cowel intake makes a noticible difference. It won't make any difference where you pick up your air from under the bonnet, it will be hotter than the air outside your bonnet. the gap between the bonnet and screen is a high pressure area , so it is a good place to pick up your air from.

Let's just agree to disagree :D
Graham


Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests