1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Engines, Transmissions & Final Drive questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel

User avatar
philz
Wheel guru
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:32 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Sydney

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby philz » Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:09 pm

budget?

93_Clubman
Speed Racer
Posts: 11983
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Melbourne

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby 93_Clubman » Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:47 pm

LMW, not sure if you've seen the following, but if not it might assist:
http://www.miata.net/products/intex/

User avatar
Jeo
Speed Racer
Posts: 3655
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:33 am
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Canberra

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby Jeo » Sat Nov 15, 2008 11:29 pm

Have a look at this if you're interested in the DIY approach

grump
Fast Driver
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:33 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane bayside

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby grump » Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:24 am

mx5 mania cold air intake, I have one arriving next week. For $250 you can't go wrong. In QLD it is against the law to have a pod filter that is open to the engine bay, because of the unheard of chance of backfire and the resulting inferno. It is also against the law to have a gear stick knob without the H pattern on it . ahh its a wonderfull world we live in.
Bond, James Bond. growing old is not an option, growing up is

Spranga
Racing Driver
Posts: 670
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 9:44 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Inner West Sydney

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby Spranga » Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:53 pm

If you do decide to cut the firewall check my youtube vids. My car was stock in almost everyway (including the exhaust) except for the mania CAI. It is very loud under large throttle openings.

PS they also have a no drill kit.

User avatar
Steampunk
Speed Racer
Posts: 4670
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:16 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Southside of Breeze-bane

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby Steampunk » Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:52 pm

The biggest restriction lies with the stock airbox and inlet tubing. In a fairly recent Hot4's they tested a stock NB in simple stages:
1) no changes to intake
2) remove OEM panel filter only
3) stick a foam "sock" filter onto inlet leaving the top of the airbox open

Removing the OEM filter only, made no difference on the Dyno, whilst removing the top of the airbox and installing a sock-type foam filter made significant improvement in all rev-ranges, especially in the mid-range.

Here is an article from Autospeed as authored by Matty: http://www.autospeed.com/A_110680/cms/article.html
Image

User avatar
Russellb
RIP Nov 2014
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:22 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Harden NSW
Contact:

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby Russellb » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:10 pm

With my 94 clubman I made 72 KW ATRW stock
with the filter removed made 84KW ATRW
so on the NA8 the biggest prob is the filter
replace with a pod and heat sheild/cold air divider (like Image)
My ClubmanRebuild
MX5 Solution Canberra ( aka carco )http://www.carco.com.au
Russell's Race and Rally Service
MX5 SE Rally car is HERE :)

93_Clubman
Speed Racer
Posts: 11983
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:35 pm
Vehicle: Clubman
Location: Melbourne

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby 93_Clubman » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:41 pm

LMW wrote:Anyone heard about this one:
http://www.knfilters.com/search/product ... od=57-0348

It looks just what I am looking for and the guys at the local Autopro are going to see if they can get it in.


saw this when I was looking around - from memory quite expensive for what's contained in the kit, i.e. around $300, however the principle behind it seemed reasonable. If you can't get it locally, try Rocket Industries in Sydney <www.rocketindustries.com.au> they're some sort of K&N importer/distributor.

User avatar
Matty
Racing Driver
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby Matty » Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:38 pm

li21 wrote:
1red5 wrote:The biggest restriction lies with the stock airbox and inlet tubing. In a fairly recent Hot4's they tested a stock NB in simple stages:
1) no changes to intake
2) remove OEM panel filter only
3) stick a foam "sock" filter onto inlet leaving the top of the airbox open

Removing the OEM filter only, made no difference on the Dyno, whilst removing the top of the airbox and installing a sock-type foam filter made significant improvement in all rev-ranges, especially in the mid-range.

Isnt running without a filter a bad thing?

Also what exactly is this sock type filter?

Yup, no filter is pretty stupid. It's OK for a brief dyno test where you're confident nothing will be sucked in (there's still the mesh on the MAF to prevent large debris getting in).

But the point of the test was (presumably) to demonstrate that filters are rarely restrictive.

User avatar
TieNN89
Speed Racer
Posts: 2012
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:27 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

1994 1.8 litre NA and CAI

Postby TieNN89 » Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:54 am

grump wrote:In QLD it is against the law to have a pod filter that is open to the engine bay, because of the unheard of chance of backfire and the resulting inferno.


i was told that is in NSW and in QLD it only need to be mounted solid


Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests