Hey all. This forum is not used a great deal but here goes ....
I bought a G-Tech Pro Competition (same as current version except different colours). Long story short .... got power figures between 92-99 HP@wheels.
Now ... Gtech claims that these are \"truer\" figures cause rolling road resistance is greater than rollers on dyno, plus wind-drag is a factor, therefore the figures should read lower than what you will get on a chassis dyno, and truer cause it takes out all possible drivetrain losses.
My car is a 94 NA. Mods: Ram-pod, straighter/larger steel induction pipe, Apexi 4-1 extractors, straight-through muffler.
No changes to internals or timing or fuel.
Does 90+hp/70+kW @ wheels sound too high, too low, just right?
Cheers
Andrew
G-tech & dyno power figures
- Steampunk
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:16 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Southside of Breeze-bane
G-tech & dyno power figures
Last edited by Steampunk on Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Steampunk
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:16 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Southside of Breeze-bane
- Steampunk
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:16 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Southside of Breeze-bane
UPDATE:
Just did a couple of runs at Redcliffe Dyno & Performance: 64.3kW@wheels.
I'm satisfied with that.
There are issues after 5,000RPM that I will need to research and address.
Inlet temp was 41 deg celcius. Not happy with that.
I'll post a photo of the graph on Monday and you can see that the top of the power curve is pretty crappy.
Just did a couple of runs at Redcliffe Dyno & Performance: 64.3kW@wheels.
I'm satisfied with that.
There are issues after 5,000RPM that I will need to research and address.
Inlet temp was 41 deg celcius. Not happy with that.
I'll post a photo of the graph on Monday and you can see that the top of the power curve is pretty crappy.
- Okibi
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 10898
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NB SE
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
Re:
1red5 wrote:90+hp/70+kW @ wheels
1red5 wrote:..64.3kW@wheels...Inlet temp was 41 deg celcius.....
64.3 kilowatts = 86.2277204 HP
http://www.musclecarclub.com/library/tech/intake.shtml
A common rule of thumb is that decreasing the air intake temperature by 10 degrees F will increase horsepower and torque by 1%
19"c is 66.2"f
So increase in power by 6.6%
6.6% of 86.2Hp = 5.6892Hp
so about 92HP
1red5 wrote:90+hp/70+kW @ wheels
Sounds pretty close then
If you had access to a car like this, would you take it back right away? Neither would I.
- Steampunk
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:16 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Southside of Breeze-bane
Thanks Dave
I love my G-tech
How can such a little device bring so much joy?! .... girls ... don't answer that
I'll try and post a photo of the dyno graph now so you can see why I said I was \"satisfied\" with the result.
Check out the top of the power-curve. Yuck.
Air Fuel Ratio (scale on right) is also rather underisable for first half.
So boffins ... what do you reckon can be the cause of such a crappy power curve peak and crappy first-half air-fuel ratio?
My car is: NA8 133,000km, larger intake piping & air-pod, 4-1 extractors, spark plugs and leads replaced 4years/25,000km ago, Caltex Vortex 98, standard timing, everything else stock, runs fine.
I love my G-tech
How can such a little device bring so much joy?! .... girls ... don't answer that
I'll try and post a photo of the dyno graph now so you can see why I said I was \"satisfied\" with the result.
Check out the top of the power-curve. Yuck.
Air Fuel Ratio (scale on right) is also rather underisable for first half.
So boffins ... what do you reckon can be the cause of such a crappy power curve peak and crappy first-half air-fuel ratio?
My car is: NA8 133,000km, larger intake piping & air-pod, 4-1 extractors, spark plugs and leads replaced 4years/25,000km ago, Caltex Vortex 98, standard timing, everything else stock, runs fine.
- JBT
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 7946
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NC
- Location: Brisbane
- blackster
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:11 am
- Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
- Location: Sydney
As mentioned above if you have lost power and upset the AFR then the cheap fix is to return the car back to stock.
On the other hand breathing mods may need to be utilised via some sought of aftermarket ECU intervention ie piggyback or standalone. The ECU intervention should fix the power and AFR curve. I wouldnt expect to much of power gain though with the ECU if the car is to remain naturally aspirated with no other mods.
On the other hand breathing mods may need to be utilised via some sought of aftermarket ECU intervention ie piggyback or standalone. The ECU intervention should fix the power and AFR curve. I wouldnt expect to much of power gain though with the ECU if the car is to remain naturally aspirated with no other mods.
Previous
04' MX5 SE.
02' MX5 Classic ed.
04' MX5 SE.
02' MX5 Classic ed.
- Russellb
- RIP Nov 2014
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:22 pm
- Vehicle: Clubman
- Location: Harden NSW
- Contact:
Not the best from a 1.8
You can see on my graph the green line is with similer mods and it made it to 79 KW at tha stage it had 180000 Kms on the clock
the red line is with the turbo
Your AFR are about right for a STD computer.
You can see on my graph the green line is with similer mods and it made it to 79 KW at tha stage it had 180000 Kms on the clock
the red line is with the turbo
Your AFR are about right for a STD computer.
My ClubmanRebuild
MX5 Solution Canberra ( aka carco )http://www.carco.com.au
Russell's Race and Rally Service
MX5 SE Rally car is HERE
MX5 Solution Canberra ( aka carco )http://www.carco.com.au
Russell's Race and Rally Service
MX5 SE Rally car is HERE
- Steampunk
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:16 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Southside of Breeze-bane
Thanks for posting Pete's graph Okibi. I don't think I'm even close as his is nice and smooth throughout the entire rev range.
79kW is pretty damn good Russ, is that with ignition timing advanced?
Novice1 got 85kW with alot more things done to his, including cams, but I think his is a 1.6 ... ?
Thanks for the advice JBT & blackster.
I think, from all your advice, I know what the problems are, and fortunately, they are relatively minor and easily fixed.
By the way, nice power from your turbo too Russ. There was an SP there and it made 128kW@wheels which is pretty good anyways.
79kW is pretty damn good Russ, is that with ignition timing advanced?
Novice1 got 85kW with alot more things done to his, including cams, but I think his is a 1.6 ... ?
Thanks for the advice JBT & blackster.
I think, from all your advice, I know what the problems are, and fortunately, they are relatively minor and easily fixed.
By the way, nice power from your turbo too Russ. There was an SP there and it made 128kW@wheels which is pretty good anyways.
Return to “Laptimes and Dyno Results”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests