NA wheel alignments, Lanny's & or Manga_Blue's?

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

User avatar
SuperMazdaKart
Racing Driver
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:10 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Adelaide

NA wheel alignments, Lanny's & or Manga_Blue's?

Postby SuperMazdaKart » Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:29 pm

http://www.hummingbirds.net/alignment.html Lanny's
http://www.aus-cartalk.com/tech/mbsuspension.htm manga_blue's


Have many used either settings? does the Lanny work well on Australian roads? I'll be going for one of these alignments next time round, just dunno which one first.

The car is of course the NA6 MarioKart. Has been lowered a little with WhiteLine springs, has KYB AGXs, 14\" StarCorp wheels & Bridgestone Turanza tyres in 185/60R14 size (usually 33psi but sometimes I use 32psi, tried the Mazda recommended 28psi & it just seems like too much drag on the engine).

So far I've been getting standard alignments at Bob Jane but think I'll goto TyrePower next, though just which one in Adelaide. Might have to look up a few threads, I think AdamNAclubman had a particular aligner he always goes to.

Does a ballasted/custom settings alignment usually cost more then a regular factory spec alignment??

The car won't be taken onto the track so just roads for me, & I don't want to lose too much tyre life either.
Image

User avatar
SuperMazdaKart
Racing Driver
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:10 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Adelaide

Postby SuperMazdaKart » Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:30 pm

bump.

what we all use standard factory set alignments do we??
Image

User avatar
Steampunk
Speed Racer
Posts: 4670
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:16 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Southside of Breeze-bane

Postby Steampunk » Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:28 pm

Now now, no need to get nasty. I would have replied had I seen this thread earlier.

My current alignment was using Lanny's one but with less camber f&r; I asked for -1.5 rear, and -1.1 front as I don't push it as hard as Lanny says he does.

It was done in early July, and I've done one track day with it.

Some say the toe in is too much and completely unnecessary, and it would have an adverse affect on turn-in responsiveness, but I can't really imagine my car would turn in alot better than what it has.

Next time I'll use the exact same settings and just change the toe to \"0\" and find out.

Oh and my suspension is dead stock, except 26mm solid front sway bar, but I did the alignment before I got the sway bar in. (94 NA with 133,000km)
Image

User avatar
StanTheMan
Forum legend
Posts: 6824
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Balgowlah

Postby StanTheMan » Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:27 pm

I found lannys allignment extreemly lethargic & boring. great for freeways
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6

manga_blue
Forum Guru
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Moruya, NSW

Re:

Postby manga_blue » Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:32 pm

1red5 wrote:Oh and my suspension is dead stock, except 26mm solid front sway bar, but I did the alignment before I got the sway bar in. (94 NA with 133,000km)

I reckon it would handle like a pig with a heavy front bar and those settings.

Try some more aggressive settings, you won't go back.
’95 NA8

User avatar
Steampunk
Speed Racer
Posts: 4670
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:16 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Southside of Breeze-bane

Postby Steampunk » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:12 am

Will do.
Image

User avatar
zoomzoom
Racing Driver
Posts: 891
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:59 pm
Vehicle: NA6 - Turbo
Location: Brisbane

Postby zoomzoom » Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:27 pm

I've had a few different alignment setups, and what I have got at the moment is very similar to mb's. I was running 2.5* neg all round for a while before that 1.5* all reound and now I have gone back to 2.0* all round. running this little bit less is still much better than the 1.5* and not noticably different to 2.5* but should have better tyre life. the other added benifit of a little less neg is that I have been able to get about 5.5* castor on it now which improves turn in. I had the front toed out about 6mm for a day when I changed my rack and before I got the last alignment and it is absolutely amazing the imrovement in turn in from 1.0mm toe in each side(2.0 total). I have now got the front toe at 0.0mm(straight) which works really well without the expense of huge tyre wear.

Hope that helps a bit, this is my current alignment summed up, which I am very happy with atm:

Front:
Camber- -2.0*
Castor- +5.5*
Toe- 0.0mm

Rear:
Camber- -2.0*
Toe- -1.0mm each side(toe in, 2.0mm total)

Cheers,
Tim


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 352 guests