195's or 205's???

Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres questions and answers

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

User avatar
Jimmy
Fast Driver
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Canberra

195's or 205's???

Postby Jimmy » Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:19 pm

Ive ordered some Yokohama S-Drives to go on rims 15x6.5. I ordered 205/50R15 but havent paid so i can change size if i wish. Ive got this weird feeling that i should be going 195's but i dont know why. Im looking for advice whether 195's or 205's would be the way to go. What are peoples experiences with them? Handling comparisons? Any compromises?
Image

User avatar
StanTheMan
Forum legend
Posts: 6824
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Balgowlah

Postby StanTheMan » Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:25 pm

I have 205......but thats because The tyre i have is not avail in 195.

Handling wise......I can't recall. It must be at least 3.5 years since i've had 195's

But i'd stick to 195. If i could. Just because its lighter & closer to original size.

If you want to look tough......get the 205's
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6

Adam_NAclubman
Racing Driver
Posts: 1418
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:39 pm
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Postby Adam_NAclubman » Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:51 pm

You should have 195's if you're going for a 50 profile

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Postby JBT » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:08 am

195/50 15\" will be the same rolling diameter as your original 185/60 14\".
Image

manga_blue
Forum Guru
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Moruya, NSW

Postby manga_blue » Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:47 pm

I've got 205s. I don't think the extra width gives any benefits. 195s would be better.
’95 NA8

User avatar
sabretooth
Speed Racer
Posts: 2119
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo

Postby sabretooth » Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:46 pm

I have 7\" wide rims, so I'm going 205/50/R15.

kula
Racing Driver
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:08 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Postby kula » Mon Jul 30, 2007 7:28 pm

double trouble
Last edited by kula on Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kula
Racing Driver
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:08 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Postby kula » Mon Jul 30, 2007 7:29 pm

i run 195s on 8inch wide wheels.
probly wider than 205s on 6inchers.

User avatar
deez
Fast Driver
Posts: 341
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:20 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Postby deez » Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:47 pm

I'd go 195's too....and stretch them like Kula on 7 or 8 inchers (wider rims)

Right now I've got 205's on 7 inchers, but after I made that purchase I received feedback from various people that wider tyres are inferior in the wet and tend to aquaplane more too. Can someone confirm that?
89 Eunos Roadster
Image

User avatar
sabretooth
Speed Racer
Posts: 2119
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo

Postby sabretooth » Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:02 pm

How is a larger contact patch (regardless of how minor) inferior, short of poor tyre design being unable to properly disperse water? That question asked though, I went with 205s because of the rolling diameter and looks, as I personally felt that 195s looked too skinny on my rims. If not for that, I'd have gone for the cheaper 195s.

manga_blue
Forum Guru
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Moruya, NSW

Postby manga_blue » Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:48 pm

I don't think you actually get a larger contact patch with a 205/50 over a 195/50. There's not enough weight in an MX5 to do that. You just get a different shaped patch instead, plus a little bit of additional tyre weight, plus some additional sidewall height and flex.
’95 NA8

User avatar
Jimmy
Fast Driver
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Canberra

Postby Jimmy » Tue Jul 31, 2007 2:50 pm

Interesting point: The S-Drive is cheaper in the 205 compared to the 195. $10-$15 difference. How come?
Image

Adam_NAclubman
Racing Driver
Posts: 1418
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:39 pm
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Postby Adam_NAclubman » Tue Jul 31, 2007 6:25 pm

195's look phat on 7 inch rims

User avatar
deez
Fast Driver
Posts: 341
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:20 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re:

Postby deez » Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:33 am

Adam_NAclubman wrote:195's look phat on 7 inch rims


Wish I went 195....always next tyre change :)
89 Eunos Roadster
Image

User avatar
Gazbo
Fast Driver
Posts: 244
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:16 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Sydney-ish

Re:

Postby Gazbo » Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:15 am

manga_blue wrote:I don't think you actually get a larger contact patch with a 205/50 over a 195/50. There's not enough weight in an MX5 to do that. You just get a different shaped patch instead, plus a little bit of additional tyre weight, plus some additional sidewall height and flex.


This is true. Have a look at this site for a good explanation:
http://www.carbibles.com/tyre_bible.html

(Actually page 2 http://www.carbibles.com/tyre_bible_pg2.html deals with tyre width)
Daily: 2006 "C" Mazda3 SP23
Fun: 1993 NA6
Image


Return to “MX5 Wheels, Suspension, Brakes & Tyres”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 146 guests