Rev Limiter Crystal
Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, miata, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, Andrew, The American, Lokiel
- StanTheMan
- Forum legend
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Balgowlah
- Boyracer
- MX-5 Encyclopedia
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NC
- Location: Silverdale.NSW
- Contact:
- Matty
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re:
Boyracer wrote:Don't bother...power drops off at about where the rev. limit is...
It's not about power, it's about being able to hang onto a lower gear without upshifting between corners.
But that said, in the 1-2 shift, the car still makes more power at the OEM redline in 1st than at the same speed in second, so there should be a small benefit. It will also lean out the (too rich OEM) mixture slightly, which should pay some dividends.
The standard xtal is 4MHz (or 8MHz in some cases), so depending on what redline you want, you scale up the clock speed accordingly (for example, a 4.4MHz xtal will give a 10% higher rev limit, 7200x4.4/4.0 = 7920 - that's about as high as you'd want to go before hardware issues start)
Electronics suppliers should have them - Jaycar, Farnell, RG, etc...
- Matty
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re:
Prinju wrote:Thanks for that Matty.![]()
So if my ECU has a 8mhz, i should get a 8.8mhz xtal...right
yeah, but I'd suggest either geting both and returning whichever one isn't right, or pulling the cover on the ECU and checking first...
Of course, the gains will be pretty small. There's some dyno results on miataforum if you search.
Note that everything scales up by the clock speed change: idle speed, ignition timing curve, etc.
Personally I'd stick to about a 5% clock speed change (that's what I'd planned, but the xtal - 4.19MHz - was hard to find and I ended up giving it to Stantheman so ask him about the results)
- StanTheMan
- Forum legend
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Balgowlah
well....its goes something like this.
I mucked around with the AFM a few years back & tightened the spring by 5 clicks from stock.
Then I installed the 4.19 crystal Matty gave me. so I was running extreemly lean. very very peaky. I couln't tell the difference at first because when i first drove it the temp in outside weather had dropped significanly overnight. I hadn't dríven the car for a few days either so it seemed a lot more powerfull. because of the colder conditions mainly.
so I drove it around for a little while & then decided to play with the spring a little more. I released the spring by 2 notches & found it even idled a little smoother. less peaky but much smoother.
I chaged the spring about 5 or 6 times to get to where it felt best.
extreemly scintiffic that is. So overall i'd say its a vry marginal difference. its a bit like the timing bump. But a little less. if I could compare it to anything.
I've hit the rev limiter twice. Thats when testing it.....so see how it worked.
I still change gear around 6500 when going hard. But the 7550 is there if i need it.
not extreemly scintiffic ....no Dyno chats on my behalf.....just gut feeling.
yes it does go a little harder.......but its hardly noticeable.
would love to know what they say on the Dyno testing.
Happy to make my car avail. if anyone wants to compare Standard & polarised ECU.
I mucked around with the AFM a few years back & tightened the spring by 5 clicks from stock.
Then I installed the 4.19 crystal Matty gave me. so I was running extreemly lean. very very peaky. I couln't tell the difference at first because when i first drove it the temp in outside weather had dropped significanly overnight. I hadn't dríven the car for a few days either so it seemed a lot more powerfull. because of the colder conditions mainly.
so I drove it around for a little while & then decided to play with the spring a little more. I released the spring by 2 notches & found it even idled a little smoother. less peaky but much smoother.
I chaged the spring about 5 or 6 times to get to where it felt best.
extreemly scintiffic that is. So overall i'd say its a vry marginal difference. its a bit like the timing bump. But a little less. if I could compare it to anything.
I've hit the rev limiter twice. Thats when testing it.....so see how it worked.
I still change gear around 6500 when going hard. But the 7550 is there if i need it.
not extreemly scintiffic ....no Dyno chats on my behalf.....just gut feeling.
yes it does go a little harder.......but its hardly noticeable.
would love to know what they say on the Dyno testing.
Happy to make my car avail. if anyone wants to compare Standard & polarised ECU.
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6
- zoomzoom
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 891
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:59 pm
- Vehicle: NA6 - Turbo
- Location: Brisbane
All the dyno charts I have seen the power drops right off after a peak at 5800rpm and goes down quick. The oem redline is 7000rpm but by 6500 when you change gear you drop back into about the same power before the peak at 5800 so I just don't see the point of raising the rev limiter from 7200 when you really shoudn't need to use it IMO.
As for the car being rich as I have heard numerous times, my afr reads 14.7 most of the time, the richest I have seen it go is 13.8 under heavy load over 6000rpm, which is rich but again IMO not worth leaning out the rest of the rev range for, epecially when you are running the 14degree timing advance an the car has no knock sensor! Sounds like a recipe for a holed piston to me?
Just my opion, I am sure there is someone out there who actually knows there is advantages not just going by feel, (no disrespect meant) and can correct me.
Tim
As for the car being rich as I have heard numerous times, my afr reads 14.7 most of the time, the richest I have seen it go is 13.8 under heavy load over 6000rpm, which is rich but again IMO not worth leaning out the rest of the rev range for, epecially when you are running the 14degree timing advance an the car has no knock sensor! Sounds like a recipe for a holed piston to me?
Just my opion, I am sure there is someone out there who actually knows there is advantages not just going by feel, (no disrespect meant) and can correct me.
Tim
- StanTheMan
- Forum legend
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Balgowlah
no offence taken zoom zoom......lets face it. bum in seat sort of feeling is always doddgy.
but here is a little ineteresting reading.
http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.ph ... 2A+crystal
when he talks about bipes.......Personally I'm not sure what he's saying. could that be some kind of knock sensor?
but here is a little ineteresting reading.
http://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.ph ... 2A+crystal
when he talks about bipes.......Personally I'm not sure what he's saying. could that be some kind of knock sensor?
Satans Ride called F33nix the resurrected NA6
- Boags
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3533
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:25 pm
- Vehicle: NB SP
- Location: Brisvegas
- Contact:
STM - Bipes is a piggyback which retards timing based on RPM (and I think you can retard for boost too if you have turbo/supercharger).
Zoomzoom, your assumption of A/F being not too rich is based on a narrowband sensor, and I'm not convinced that the Jaycar kit is very accurate anywhere outside of 14.0:1 - 15.5:1. My autotune is set to hit 12.5:1 under boost, and generally, my af guage sits on 13.2/13.3 and stays there under boost. Occasionally, in the right circumstance and when the car is warmer, the af will drop to 12something:1 on my gauge, but not often.
There have been dyno printouts from stock NAs with the bum sniffer wideband which show 11.x:1... AFTER THE CAT.
Add another 1/1.5 to that for the actual engine afr.
The other thing is, I believe that the drop off of power at 5800rpm is because of this richness. Pulling that fuel frees horsies up high, but actually, I'm with you, other than turn 6 at QR (coming back onto the main straight), I wouldn't use a redline higher than stock.
Boags
Zoomzoom, your assumption of A/F being not too rich is based on a narrowband sensor, and I'm not convinced that the Jaycar kit is very accurate anywhere outside of 14.0:1 - 15.5:1. My autotune is set to hit 12.5:1 under boost, and generally, my af guage sits on 13.2/13.3 and stays there under boost. Occasionally, in the right circumstance and when the car is warmer, the af will drop to 12something:1 on my gauge, but not often.
There have been dyno printouts from stock NAs with the bum sniffer wideband which show 11.x:1... AFTER THE CAT.

The other thing is, I believe that the drop off of power at 5800rpm is because of this richness. Pulling that fuel frees horsies up high, but actually, I'm with you, other than turn 6 at QR (coming back onto the main straight), I wouldn't use a redline higher than stock.
Boags
Spartan Motor Sport : http://www.SpartanMS.com.au
- Matty
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
- Grumpy
- Fast Driver
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:17 pm
- Vehicle: NC
- Location: Melbourne
At what RPM is the stock cutout set at ??
Down the main straight at Phillip Island, it is not worth using 5th, so I am flat out in 4th, 7300rpm @ around 185-190k, and no revlimiter in sight. Since this, a powerchip has been fitted so this will be tested early June at another sprint on the island. Motor is standard apart from the chip and extractors.
Down the main straight at Phillip Island, it is not worth using 5th, so I am flat out in 4th, 7300rpm @ around 185-190k, and no revlimiter in sight. Since this, a powerchip has been fitted so this will be tested early June at another sprint on the island. Motor is standard apart from the chip and extractors.
Sadly MX5 less for a while.
Rebuilding an 89 Honda CRX
Rebuilding an 89 Honda CRX
- Boags
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3533
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:25 pm
- Vehicle: NB SP
- Location: Brisvegas
- Contact:
Re:
Grumpy wrote:flat out in 4th, 7300rpm @ around 185-190k, and no revlimiter in sight.

Spartan Motor Sport : http://www.SpartanMS.com.au
- Alex
- Racing Driver
- Posts: 1654
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:54 am
- Vehicle: NB8A
- Location: Sydney
Re:
Boags'MX5 wrote:Grumpy wrote:flat out in 4th, 7300rpm @ around 185-190k, and no revlimiter in sight.
The stock revlimiter is at 7200RPM...
well in the NB8A it is don't ask how I know


Red NB8A - BD rollbar - Hardtop
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:39 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Melbourne
Re:
Boags'MX5 wrote:Grumpy wrote:flat out in 4th, 7300rpm @ around 185-190k, and no revlimiter in sight.
The stock revlimiter is at 7200RPM...
yeah but our tachos' read high apparently. so grumpy was really probably only doing about 7000 to 7200rpm even tho his tacho said 7300rpm.
i was bouncing off the rev limiter all day yesterday. bloody annoying

- Boags
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3533
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:25 pm
- Vehicle: NB SP
- Location: Brisvegas
- Contact:
Re:
Fatty wrote:Boags'MX5 wrote:Grumpy wrote:flat out in 4th, 7300rpm @ around 185-190k, and no revlimiter in sight.
The stock revlimiter is at 7200RPM...
yeah but our tachos' read high apparently. so grumpy was really probably only doing about 7000 to 7200rpm even tho his tacho said 7300rpm.
i was bouncing off the rev limiter all day yesterday. bloody annoyingthat red line approaches a hell of a lot faster these days, that plus being on the drag strip, i just kept hitting it and ruining my times.

When, where and who with? And why are you just telling us now? What did you end up with?
Boags
Spartan Motor Sport : http://www.SpartanMS.com.au
-
- Speed Racer
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:39 am
- Vehicle: NA6
- Location: Melbourne
vic club had a day at the heathcote drags yesterday mate. it's been in the motorsport forum for weeks now .
started well with a 14.8.. but mainly i was around 15.3, had a 15.1 and a 15 but could not get back down to 14.8 again!
had a couple of bad runs as well at high 15's low 16's (where i kept hitting the limiter and missing gears, and wheelspinning too much off the line).
started well with a 14.8.. but mainly i was around 15.3, had a 15.1 and a 15 but could not get back down to 14.8 again!

had a couple of bad runs as well at high 15's low 16's (where i kept hitting the limiter and missing gears, and wheelspinning too much off the line).
Return to “MX5 Engines, Transmission & Final Drive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests