style bars, roll bars and schedule J compliance...

Anything to do with the MX5 and Motor Sport

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata

bpt4w

Postby bpt4w » Mon Jun 12, 2006 12:21 pm

(written in large for ease of seeing)
oh ct how wrong you are, drift and drag have very high lvls of safety and depending on speed demand you have protection (drag i beleive is 12 sec and you have to have bar and belts and 10 sec you need parashut) with a sliding scale on the safety side and the drifters seem to be regulating em selves very well with a roll cage being one of the first things you want as you get fast (its fashionable as well as making crap cars stiffer) , the new rules have finally hit us in the drift scene though and instantly road registered mx5's are almost banned from driving (there is no club lvl rules for drifting as of yet) . all i can say is that drifting is a relatively safe sort of racing , yeah cars are close together and do get to about 120 kph but most of the corners are gone round at about 60 kph (usually lots of smoke and screaming tyres) and lots of spins do happen but the guys are very good are avoiding hitting anything (not only don't want to hurt there car but have learned to control the cars to a fine point) , all i can say is that i think that the rules are good but should be put to a time/safety rule anyone wanting to run in a certain event does a test gets a sticker and has to comply to that lvl of safety and that lvls manditory safety requirements , then the more dangerous the event the more safety you need.

User avatar
CT
Racing Driver
Posts: 1418
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: By the lake...
Contact:

Postby CT » Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:49 pm

I'll write this in normal text - for those whom english is a second language. If you choose to read my post with your eyes open, you will have noticed that I was referring to the standard at club level. I will repeat, club level road racing is much more highly regulated for safetly conformance than drift or drag cars at the same level. Such a bold statement must surely come from between my legs. Well no, I actually did some drag racing in the 90s and believe me, the sh*t I saw other cars get away with and also got away with myself was bordering on criminally negligent. As for drifting safety at local days......put it this way, if I sold cable ties as battery brackets and put Drift R Spec Type B on the packaging......I'd be re-ordering stock after every event I scrutineered at.

As a sidenote, plenty of roll cages I have seen bolted into sleightys and s14s at some NSW drift says wouldn't pass CAMS strict rules for design (schedule J page 6-22 in the 2006 CAMS Manual as a reference). But again, if it says \"DriftR\" somewhere on it, it must be good huh.

I repeat - club level. bpt4w, your thread mentions there are \"no club lvl (level) rules of drifting as yet\". Tough to comply with something that DOES NOT EXIST I would have thought. (Written in large writing for ease of reading.)
2006 Z06 Corvette - 650hp of wow!

User avatar
rain902
Racing Driver
Posts: 727
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 3:58 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: ventimiglia, italia.
Contact:

criminally negligent

Postby rain902 » Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:35 pm

was talking to alan moffatt a few weeks ago, he believes that it was a fearful crime that the drivers of his day (bathurst winner 1972 i think he was) were allowed to drive on that track with the (lack of) safety gear including a rudimentary hoop if they were lucky and go as fast as they did.
2013 Australian hillclimb champion 2F
2013 qld hillclimb champion 2F
Qld & Aus 2F state record holder-mt cotton
2014 vic hillclimb champion - 2A

bpt4w

Postby bpt4w » Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:48 pm

ct i didnt mean to offend with the large writing , its just that when i write a long set , it all seems to blend into a large blur and there is no middle font on these post areas.

yeah i did drag for a bit but on the bike side there for a while , and packed a few shutes here and there and yes there is always some who get away with murder.
i think you will find that the new rules have hit drifting inspections quite hard and a lot of guys have been told to clean up there act. the roll bars that some of the guys have a international spec but not cams spec but with an inspection from a accredited cams engineer would pass (and some would also fail miserably) , drift is definately a parts car racing lvl but so is a lot of the lower lvl racing ( have a look at motorkhana, khanacross, ect) .
in the end i think it will be up to cams to work out how they will cover there ass and how to keep racing practical and safe , which is definately a big ask , hope they can do it with out going to silly.

when i said club lvl for drifting i mean there is no club lvl for drifting and all evens are run under cams tickets (only runs with no cams involve 2 in the morning on public roads) and with that it restricts kids coming in and learning how to drive instead of doing it all on the road.

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Postby JBT » Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:15 am

The silly thing about all this roll bar approval business is there seems to be little concern about how it is bolted to the car. I really do doubt the integrity of a BD or any roll bar for that matter that is bolted to the paper thin shelf behind the seats. Isn't the fuel tank under there? I reckon there's a better than fair chance that the rear bar supports would punch straight through that shelf in a rollover should the car thump the ground when inverted.
Image

User avatar
Bevan
Speed Racer
Posts: 2599
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 8:18 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: N-West Sydney

Re:

Postby Bevan » Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:41 am

JBT wrote:I reckon there's a better than fair chance that the rear bar supports would punch straight through that shelf in a rollover should the car thump the ground when inverted.
Na, it's not the rear bars that are bolted to the shelf. The rear supports are welded to a thick flat plate that runs along the length of the shelf. This would disperse the weight. The bars are wide enough to well and truely clear the fuel tank anyway. The plate is bolted to the thicker metal at the very back of the shelf, not the thin aluminium. Here's a pic of Andrew's to give you a visual indication:

Image

User avatar
rain902
Racing Driver
Posts: 727
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 3:58 am
Vehicle: NA8
Location: ventimiglia, italia.
Contact:

Re:

Postby rain902 » Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:51 am

JBT wrote:The silly thing about all this roll bar approval business is there seems to be little concern about how it is bolted to the car. I really do doubt the integrity of a BD or any roll bar for that matter that is bolted to the paper thin shelf behind the seats. Isn't the fuel tank under there? I reckon there's a better than fair chance that the rear bar supports would punch straight through that shelf in a rollover should the car thump the ground when inverted.


rather good point JBT - this issue is addressed in the manual, and covers minimum size (thickness and surface area) of backing plate and bolts (diameter, number and grade)

None of these would appear to be adaequately addressed from what ive seen here and on the track. Now keep quiet before people start checking (and rejecting) this as well! :lol:
2013 Australian hillclimb champion 2F
2013 qld hillclimb champion 2F
Qld & Aus 2F state record holder-mt cotton
2014 vic hillclimb champion - 2A

User avatar
Matty
Racing Driver
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re:

Postby Matty » Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:37 am

bpt4w wrote:ct i didnt mean to offend with the large writing , its just that when i write a long set , it all seems to blend into a large blur and there is no middle font on these post areas.


True, but the rules of modern punctuation and grammar have existed for many decades.

bpt4w

Postby bpt4w » Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:23 pm

if i acurlatey pssaed egnslih calss i wulod konw wehre to put tehm :)

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Re:

Postby JBT » Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:41 pm

Bevan wrote:The rear supports are welded to a thick flat plate that runs along the length of the shelf. This would disperse the weight. The bars are wide enough to well and truely clear the fuel tank anyway. The plate is bolted to the thicker metal at the very back of the shelf, not the thin aluminium.

According to a certifier I was speaking to few weeks ago, the BD roll bar would not pass modification engineering because the rear brace mount method (and possibly the bar itself) would not withstand the certification forces.
Image

User avatar
bigdog
King of the kennel
Posts: 2233
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:07 pm
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Blue Mountains
Contact:

Re:

Postby bigdog » Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:14 pm

JBT wrote:According to a certifier I was speaking to few weeks ago, the BD roll bar would not pass modification engineering because the rear brace mount method (and possibly the bar itself) would not withstand the certification forces.


This would depend on what they were testing for JBT. My understanding is that they would be certifying that the addition of the bar has not compromised the structural integrity of the original vehicle (and I am almost positive that this is not the case). They would not be certifying the roll-over worthiness of the bar for RTA type engineering purposes. All add on ROPS are a compromise of some sort, and the BD design is not bad IMHO given the position and type of installation required. I would expect a Jap made bar that required holes to be cut in the parcel shelf would have problems passing certification in Aus - the engineers don't like holes in structural panels or firewalls.
Image
Marvin - '02 Silver SP - BD, PSS9, Guru, Build #62 Cardomain

User avatar
Cal
Racing Driver
Posts: 1625
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: Brisbane.
Contact:

Postby Cal » Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:34 pm

This roll bar fiasco is about to get a lot worse for us. The 2\" above the helmet rule is to be extended to say the bar must also be 2\" laterally from your shoulder. So any chance of running a soft or hardtop on the car at any time is non existent. I was hoping to build my race car so it could run a hardtop from time to time. Can't see that happening. Was looking for a bulletin on the CAMS website with regard to this. It's not up yet, but can't be far away. Brown Davis are going to have to design a different bar for punters with street registered cars.

Cal.
Image
95 NA8 Road Registered 2F Race Car

User avatar
Bevan
Speed Racer
Posts: 2599
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 8:18 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2 GT
Location: N-West Sydney

Re:

Postby Bevan » Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:45 pm

Cal wrote:This roll bar fiasco is about to get a lot worse for us. The 2" above the helmet rule is to be extended to say the bar must also be 2" laterally from your shoulder. So any chance of running a soft or hardtop on the car at any time is non existent. I was hoping to build my race car so it could run a hardtop from time to time. Can't see that happening. Was looking for a bulletin on the CAMS website with regard to this. It's not up yet, but can't be far away. Brown Davis are going to have to design a different bar for punters with street registered cars.

Cal.
That sux! Surely the width of the cars body, with the height of the roll bar, and being strapped in tight by a harness would more than protect your shoulder? :? :evil:

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Re:

Postby JBT » Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:21 pm

bigdog wrote:This would depend on what they were testing for JBT.

Certificate of modification for roadworthiness was how it was explained to me. He indicated it would need to be fixed (welded?) to the structural parts of the body at frame level as opposed to bracing parts like the rear shelf. But then again there was his point about the strength of the bar itself (type/size of material and welding) being doubtful. I agree that the BD looks the goods (even though I think the installation as a bit sus), but this guy is the professional and has no axe to grind............and neither do I.
Image

User avatar
bigdog
King of the kennel
Posts: 2233
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:07 pm
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Blue Mountains
Contact:

Re:

Postby bigdog » Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:22 pm

Cal wrote:This roll bar fiasco is about to get a lot worse for us. The 2" above the helmet rule is to be extended to say the bar must also be 2" laterally from your shoulder. So any chance of running a soft or hardtop on the car at any time is non existent. I was hoping to build my race car so it could run a hardtop from time to time. Can't see that happening. Was looking for a bulletin on the CAMS website with regard to this. It's not up yet, but can't be far away. Brown Davis are going to have to design a different bar for punters with street registered cars.

Cal.


I haven't heard anything to this effect on my CAMS grapevine Cal. Do you have a reliable source on this? It would seem to be a tall order in most road based vehicles (V8 Supercars would come to mind - the bars in these are all around the driver - and most sports sedans I've seen would have trouble with this too).
Image
Marvin - '02 Silver SP - BD, PSS9, Guru, Build #62 Cardomain


Return to “MX5 Motor Sport”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests