I think it's good to dispel myths when we can, based on experiences. Save people money. My experiences are pretty different to the suggestions on the internet – I think majority due to driving style and the 1.6 motor.
Datalogs- megasquirt, sensors; OEM. I’ll upload after my next track day, unless it melts.
5 years supercharged. 6 months turbo - allegedly ~180bhp supercharged (i say that because i've had different dyno results). let's say 170bhp. 10.5psi, regularly revlimiting on the track. I’ve wound the tubby up to 12.5psi, no idea of bhp but was shocked to feel the 1.8 oem clutch hold the torque. I only went upto the torsen because of the internet.. the 1.6 open wasn't exhibiting any issues.
Let’s deal with each item separately; the purpose is testing the null hypothesis that all these mods are required
Clutch – actually ‘used’ 1.8 clutch (!!) bought off a guy in wales (UK). I think 20k miles. Well established knowledge that torque kills… correlated to driving style (a la, slip that thing and it dies). If I continue to ‘delay’ power until revs are match and no slip possible, I’ll extend it’s life.
Likely upgrade needed for the slipper and more aggressive gear changing.
COPS – legit, I don’t see the need on the 1.6. no spark blowout and no reliability issues. 1.8, different story.
Injectors – depends on duty cycle. But I seem to be ok on 315cc. nice idle for the smaller size. Next dyno I’ll let you know
Rad and coolant re-route. For street, in my experience auto (two cores?) is fine. Track, fine supercharged.. but will have to report back now turbo. Re-route? Turn on the heater. Turbo I can feel a sh*t load more heat, so yes.. this one may be needed.
Oil cooler- no idea why needed for my use. But I don’t monitor oil temps, relying on coolant temp being the symptom. Competitive track, more likely.
The point is… don’t spend $$$ if you don’t have to. Monitor your temps and decide yourself.
rascal wrote:Your particular usage plays a massive part in whether the above is needed or not..
Run the car for any decent time on the track and you'll almost definitely need all the above or it wont stay together long.
Just daily driving with the occasional squirt through the gears and you prob wont need any of the above.
Its the sustained high revs that usually causes heat issues, and requires the above solutions.
Dead right.
Magpie wrote:but never seen >90 centigrade coolant, if this is on the track then your cooling system must be awesome!
What are you using for data logs? Where are your sensors located and have they been calibrated?
I may revise that to 95 degrees!! haha. no calibration, just listening for boiling water and comparing sensor reading.
I'll verify/prove myself wrong next track day
NitroDann wrote:To the OP,
As someone who has built, tuned, dríven and maintained dozens of turbo mx5's, Id say you drive very conservatively.
In your head this may not seem right, but im absolutely certain you drive very conservatively compared to a lot of people.
As was said right away, its about the use and horsepower not the boost pressure. While you may find your car adequate all of the time I guarantee Sebastian Loeb (Or even Mark Hellmun) can fry your clutch, brakes, coolant, oil, and almost definitely your wheel bearings in 3 or 4 laps of a fast circuit.
As a quick example, I routinely fit inconel stud and nut kits to cars, which is 4 studs and 4 special nuts costing >$150 alone to hold the turbo to the manifold. We also machine the flanges and run no gaskets to eliminate the gaskets from failing, on top of this the manifolds and turbos are machined and tapped to fit studs with 55% more cross sectional area which are held in with a special ceramic locking compound which costs $200/bottle, because even the near 50 dollar each stud and nut combo in 8mm diameter sometimes isnt enough.
Dann
Good points, maybe i need to push the car more.. or maybe i shouldn't. No inconel here, just bunnings.
This is just a street car with track usage once every 2 months. Suggest we calibrate our advice to suit usage.