SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Discussion regarding Turbocharged and supercharged MX-5s

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, The American, Lokiel, -alex, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, Sean

denod1958

SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby denod1958 » Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:35 pm

Good afternoon, this is my first posting so please be patient.

I'm considering an MX5 for weekends and 3-4 club sprint days per year. Car will be a long term hold. Have had numnerous cars Westfield, V8 MG's etc and curently have very capable daily drivers but want something that is quick on the track but can still be used on the road in reasonable comfort. Budget up to $35k if need be.(any more than this then I'd just get a Lotus Elise)
Whilst there are other car make options in this price range that are quick in standard form (BMW M3 E36, 350Z, Porsche 944T) the MX5 are tempting due to their weight, simplicity and good
handling.

My options are:
1)SP - with good tyres and pads (pros: good standard performance cons: good examples are rare and overpriced)
2)SE - low mileage cars can be had for low $20k's plus $6-8k in performance mods to equal or exceed the SP
3)NC - supercharged

Any constructive comments would be appreciated especially around options 2 & 3.

many thanks

User avatar
Hellmun
Racing Driver
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:15 pm
Vehicle: NB8B - Turbo
Location: Wollongong,NSW

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Hellmun » Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:07 pm

Is there a lap-time you'd like the car to be capable of at a particular track or a particular category to race in (there are MANY different supersprints regs)? Each car has different limits/required mods depending on how fast you really want it to go and how competitive in what category. As much information as possible on what you consider a good comfortable daily would be a good idea too as power can overcome squishy suspension to a degree if that's required etc.

SE will probably be the least work of all 3 though if it has to be lawfully registered and modified. SP's are rare and always command a premium, NC never came with the charger so it's going to require engineering/emissions to lawfully register/insure. They also have the strictest emission requirements...

What else have you had on the track?

User avatar
bruce
Speed Racer
Posts: 7707
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby bruce » Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:10 pm

Looks like you've researched the forum, so you already know the answers! Don't know if there can be much added.
SE is a known and much modified quantity.
NC supercharged is only starting to be done locally, so is still a bit 'new' (as in there are only a few getting around - one or two literally).

raceme81
Learner Driver
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 8:12 pm

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby raceme81 » Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:19 pm

im going the sc nc just waiting on news on the insurance
this has me real worried
NC never came with the charger so it's going to require engineering/emissions to lawfully register/insure. They also have the strictest emission requirements...

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby NitroDann » Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:02 pm

Im here just to say thankyou for such a well written and well thought out first post.

Appreciate the effort and research you have already done.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

OurCognitiveSurplus
Racing Driver
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 2:40 pm
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Canberra

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby OurCognitiveSurplus » Sun Jul 29, 2012 9:03 pm

IMHO the NC feels like a better bolted-together car. The doors close nicely, the soft-top is nicer to use and close etc. Also safety is better on-road.

In terms if laptimes, a stock NC is fairly similar to a stock SE (happy to be corrected on that). But if an NA goes like a FI, you have to be pretty impressed by the NA.

If the budget works for the charged NC, that's what I'd look at. Esp if the car will be used in the real world.
Image
NB8A - Twilight Blue

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby NitroDann » Sun Jul 29, 2012 9:42 pm

Ok here I go lol.

The NC feels better quality because its heavier, and has more modern features that remove the sports car feeling from it.

This is why so many hold the NA so highly.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

Hjt
Speed Racer
Posts: 2499
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:46 pm
Vehicle: NB8A

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Hjt » Sun Jul 29, 2012 9:46 pm

Try all 3, the se and sp perform so different. Stock and modified.

Zohxoco
Fast Driver
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Zohxoco » Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:02 pm

Exactly. Driver, tyres, suspension, alignment, and general track readiness is more important if you are only looking at lap times. Another excellent option is an NA NC with retune and/or rebuilt engine.

I would argue that you would buy an MX-5 because you either want an MX-5 (ie. a roadster- meaning you like the look, the convertible nature, the lifestyle), or as a relatively cheap track only vehicle. If you just want a quick car that is also practical, there are plenty of other options, some of which you have highlighted- but there are many others. Likewise I think a Lotus is also a specialist vehicle, which I don't think is a serious daily driver IMHO.
Last edited by Zohxoco on Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby JBT » Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:05 pm

You may have trouble fitting into an SE if you are tall unless the seats have been modified or changed for aftermarket types. A blown NC would be great but I'm not sure that all the issues (engineering, reliability etc.) concerning this modification have been completely resolved. Even a naturally aspirated NC with an ECU tweak and some suspension mods can be very quick - see Reggie's posts - 1:13s at Wakefield Park on KU31 tyres is excellent.
Image

User avatar
bruce
Speed Racer
Posts: 7707
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby bruce » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:43 pm

Maybe a modded NC (not supercharged) might be the car for you. As said, I think a stock NC is as quick as a stock SE.
What State are you in? This affects the registration question of a supercharged NC.

deviant
Racing Driver
Posts: 1717
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:23 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Rockingham - Western Australia

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby deviant » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:03 pm

Think carefully about what you want when you are on track especially if you want to compete for times. Having a car with forced induction can put you in a class against some very serious bits of kit with even more serious drivers or serious cars with clueless drivers that can still be quicker just through having all the gear....everyone says they are okay chasing their own times but I dont believe a word of it myself, better to be in a more standard car and compete for class wins I say.

Also the less modified a car the less it is going to cost you in fuel, tyres, brakes, servicing.

Zohxoco
Fast Driver
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Zohxoco » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:22 pm

Some excellent advice from bruce and deviant. Specifically, we need to know more from the OP regarding what he is really after. I mean really. As in what is the goal? To have fun on the track, to be in a motorsport scene, to be the quickest no matter what, etc etc. What makes you tick, and why.

As I said before, the MX-5 can be a capable track machine but it's not the quickest. Pushing it to be so is to miss the point. Alternatively, as a road car it is fun and rewarding to drive- but the OP never mentioned that, just said that it should be able to drive on the road in "reasonable comfort". Again, subjective. One man's reasonable is another man's excruciating. I know people who find the MX-5 claustrophobic and extremely uncomfortable. And on the street, what would it be used for, given that he already has "very capable daily drivers". Not being cynical here, we just need more information. Fun was not mentioned by the OP but to me is the main reason to get an MX-5. Outright speed it is not and never will be.

User avatar
hks_kansei
Speed Racer
Posts: 6154
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:43 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: Victoria

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby hks_kansei » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:24 pm

NitroDann wrote:Ok here I go lol.

The NC feels better quality because its heavier, and has more modern features that remove the sports car feeling from it.

This is why so many hold the NA so highly.

Dann


True, but remember that one of the OP's values is that it must be somewhat comfortable.

Depending on what he/she classifies as "somewhat comfortable" could rule out an NA



Although, seeing that they've owned a westfield in the past I would say they can live with some pretty rough comfort.
1999 Mazda MX5 - 1989 Honda CT110 (for sale) - 1994 Mazda 626 wagon (GF's)

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby JBT » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:27 pm

An NA wasn't on the OP's list of options.
Image


Return to “MX5 Forced induction (Turbo/Supercharger)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 246 guests