SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Discussion regarding Turbocharged and supercharged MX-5s

Moderators: timk, Stu, -alex, StanTheMan, greenMachine, ManiacLachy, Daffy, zombie, The American, Lokiel, Sean

User avatar
JBT
Speed Racer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NC
Location: Brisbane

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby JBT » Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:01 pm

hks_kansei wrote:
JBT wrote:An NA wasn't on the OP's list of options.


NA / NB, same thing compared to an NC.

Yep, both are "old technology". :mrgreen:
Image

hb
Driver
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 1:11 am
Vehicle: NB8A
Location: newcastle

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby hb » Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:53 pm

hks_kansei wrote:
JBT wrote:An NA wasn't on the OP's list of options.


NA / NB, same thing compared to an NC.

except the NBs hes listed are both factory turbo
ginger bread man

User avatar
bruce
Speed Racer
Posts: 7782
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby bruce » Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:38 pm

Stop going off topic! OP has narrowed his choice down to an SE or an NC. Stop blathering on about NAs or even stock NBs.

Keith
Fast Driver
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:07 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Hunter region

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Keith » Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:57 pm

Depending on your intended class, an NC offers you the option of upgrading to a 2.3 or 2.5 litre block later on. This swap is becoming relatively common in the USA but I am not sure if anyone has gone down that path locally. The info I have seen suggests you keep the NC head, and the extra CDs come from stroking the Mazda 3 SP 23 or 25 engine. Just a thought....
O6 Marble white NC ;91 Malibu Gold NA 1800 BP4W;1990 BRG LE hardtop, unmolested, original; 1993 Brilliant Black hardtop, unmolested, restored.

Keith
Fast Driver
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:07 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Hunter region

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Keith » Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:58 pm

Bloody autocorrect...CCs, not CDs!!!!
O6 Marble white NC ;91 Malibu Gold NA 1800 BP4W;1990 BRG LE hardtop, unmolested, original; 1993 Brilliant Black hardtop, unmolested, restored.

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby NitroDann » Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:00 pm

Theres a 2.5 locally.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

Hjt
Speed Racer
Posts: 2499
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:46 pm
Vehicle: NB8A

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Hjt » Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:17 pm

Stop going off topic! OP has narrowed his choice down to an SE or an NC. Stop blathering on about NAs or even stock NBs.


The SP model was also mentioned. But your correct enough :)

Madanark
Learner Driver
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:53 pm
Vehicle: ND - 2
Location: Canberra

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Madanark » Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:49 pm

It really depends on what it will be used for and what kind of power delivery you are after...
I'm running a NC with an SC and the power delivery is similar to a stock NC but there is just more grunt. Lots of down low torque but sorta runs out of puff up higher.
$35k might not be enough for the NC as you'll want suspension ($2000-$3000), SC ($7500 installed with clutch) and if you want to do any track work, brakes ($2000) and wheels ($1500) too. (all approx. prices)

Your best first move is to drive both. :)

User avatar
Hammer
Speed Racer
Posts: 2849
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NB SP
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Hammer » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:31 pm

Here's what is supposedly an SP for sale off eBay for $15k with 128k kms.

Though on closer inspection of the photos, the car does not look like an SP:
- It does not have the SP interior bling
- Exhaust tip looks like standard NB
- No SP decal (though this could have been removed)
- Couldn't really tell from the photos if there is an intercooler or not.
- And finally, the add says, this is a 2003 model car. I know the last of the SPs were 2002 model NB8Bs. I got one of the last ones (March 2002 build date / April 2002 Compliance).

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/261058341582 ... 3D1&_rdc=1
H@mmer - 1994 Clubman | 2002 SP
Image
GO TOPLESS!!!

User avatar
NitroDann
Forum sponsor
Posts: 10280
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:10 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Newcastle NSW
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby NitroDann » Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:11 am

The best spend would be a neat engineered turbo or supercharged NB or NA.

Period.

Dann
http://www.NitroDann.com

speed wrote:If I was to do it again, I wouldn't even consider the supercharger.

User avatar
bootz
Racing Driver
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:13 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: The Wild Wild West

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby bootz » Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:18 am

Hammer wrote:Here's what is supposedly an SP for sale off eBay for $15k with 128k kms.

Though on closer inspection of the photos, the car does not look like an SP:
- It does not have the SP interior bling
- Exhaust tip looks like standard NB
- No SP decal (though this could have been removed)
- Couldn't really tell from the photos if there is an intercooler or not.
- And finally, the add says, this is a 2003 model car. I know the last of the SPs were 2002 model NB8Bs. I got one of the last ones (March 2002 build date / April 2002 Compliance).

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/261058341582 ... 3D1&_rdc=1


Dodgey, seeing as one engine shot would seal it. From a dealer too! :roll:
Bootz and Boof - On the road to somewhere.

User avatar
Dan
Racing Driver
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:27 pm
Vehicle: NC
Location: Sydney

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Dan » Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:22 am

Based on your clarification I'd consider buying a stock NC and fitting coil overs, headers, sway bars, end links, tyres, 4.1 R&P & Tune, that should set you back less than 25k including the cars purchase price installed if you are happy to take an older model or <30k if you want a really nice example (this excludes safety mods like seats, roll bar, harness etc...).

That should be able to lap PI in <2m if you can steer it well enough given Charlie Brown ran a 1:58 without the R&P upgrade, if you can't make the time at least you've got something to strive for and you'll be free of the reliability question mark that surrounds all FI cars so you can do more trouble free days :)

If you might supercharge it hold off on the 4.1 though so you don't have to mess around changing back to stock if you do decide you need more and on the bright side you'll have all of the supporting mods done save for the brakes.
2009 NC2 - Ohlins (7kg/5kg), Whiteline Sways, Weds TC105N (17x8), OEM Hardtop & 2009 987.2 Boxster

User avatar
Guran
Speed Racer
Posts: 3754
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:42 pm
Vehicle: ND - 1.5
Location: Albion Park NSW
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Guran » Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:26 am

Sounds like you're in Victoria? I highly recommend you get yourself to the next MX-5 Club round at Winton on 5th August, or head to Phillip Island on 4th/5th August for the 6hr regularity relay. That's this weekend! You will find a vast range of MX-5 drivers in everything from standard NA6s to modified NCs and turbo NBs. All of them are having fun on track, and all are in competitive cars for their class. Everyone there will be perfectly happy to chat about their car and track experience. :D

BTW $35k bought me a standard NA6 and three years worth of trackdays (~15 per year!) with all costs included. I'm having an absolute ball with it! :mrgreen:
Standard 2006 NC - YouTube
WP 1:11.89 | SMP-S 1:05.90 GP 1:54.93 N 1:18.09 L 2:22.49 | PW 1:02.52
PI 2:00.55 | W-S 1:12.44 W-L 1:43.36 | SR 1:33.25

User avatar
Lokiel
Forum legend
Posts: 4126
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 2:39 pm
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Brisbania

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby Lokiel » Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:07 am

denod1958 wrote::
I've dríven SP-good, SE & NC also good but to me need more power as most people have found.
Happy to mod SE/NC as required, just want to go down the best path.
Not sure what NC are good for after external engine mods before charging versus an SE with CAI, cooler,ecu and exhast upgrades. If the overall package ends up being north of $40k then its probaly becomming a poor spend and there are other options out there, eg: Lotus
:


An SE with ~A$5,000 of CAI, exhaust, injector, aftermarket ECU and tuning modz will net you about ~150rwkw which is a LOT of fun.

You'll also end up getting rid of the 17" boat anchors and upgrading to 15" rims and you'll also end up upgrading the stock suspension to coilovers so factor in another A$3000-4000 there too.

With all these SE modz, it's still cheaper than an NC.

Bear in mind that you will replace the suspension on an NC or SP too, and that on an SP, you'll probably want to install a LSD.
Don't worry about dying, worry about not living!
Garage Thread: http://www.mx5cartalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=76716

User avatar
bruce
Speed Racer
Posts: 7782
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:00 am
Vehicle: NA8 - Turbo
Location: Victoria
Contact:

Re: SP vs SE vs Supercharged NC

Postby bruce » Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:51 am

Buy an already modded SE and save a lot more $.
Not a lot of modded NCs around though.

I would lean towards an NC as it is a newer device and a lot more nicer than previous.
Get one with an electric hardtop and you can have the best of both worlds (might be a bit heavier on the track though).


Return to “MX5 Forced induction (Turbo/Supercharger)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest