timk wrote:MattR why the question on the age, are older rotors better? And how the .... do you steer a Z around Lakeside in 57 seconds, not sure if I should call BS on that!!
Tim are they DBA rotors?
Timk, I was seeing the same speeds at Lakeside as Tim (zoomzoom) down the straights, a calculated off the revs done and tyre size plus gearing, 210-220kph through the kink and 190 odd kph under the bridge, just not the corner speed, so only down to 61's, my best lap a 61.3, on a good day and 62's pretty easy on second hand tyres, down to the canvas at times, any time I took it out. It did have just shy of 200rwhp and weighed 960kg plus me so that helped a bit. Brand new tyres would have seen sub 60s laps easy, but didn't have the wallet to do that at the time at $450 a tyre.
The question regarding the rotors age was more to do with how long they had been on the car as they would have seen a lot of heat cycles and the cracking and discolouration is a sign they have probably given their best in stopping.
Standard OEM type rotors these days are comparatively soft compared to the rotors of old and as I stated in my previous post can be regarded as consumables along with the pads. With the advances in pads in the last few years, Tim can concentrate on getting the pad/rotor combination right and not really need to worry about going bigger in the brakes which has the general disadvantage of extra unsprung weight.
If anything, Tim may benefit from looking at S14 brakes, 4 spot fronts and 2 spot rears with a 280mm diameter rotor up front and 258mm diameter rotor at the rear, if he wants to upgrade, though there maybe something similar in the Mazda stable that could be an easier fit.